The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nucleospin 96 plant 2 kit

Manufactured by Macherey-Nagel
Sourced in Germany

The NucleoSpin 96 Plant II kit is a laboratory equipment designed for the efficient extraction of high-quality genomic DNA from a variety of plant species. It utilizes a silica-based membrane technology to capture and purify DNA, suitable for downstream applications such as PCR, sequencing, and further analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using nucleospin 96 plant 2 kit

1

Genotyping of Eucalyptus grandis using EUChip60K

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated from 416 E. grandis leaf samples using the Machery-Nagel NucleoSpin 96 Plant II kit (Machery-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). The integrity of all DNA preparations was validated by 1% agarose TBE gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). All samples were genotyped using the EUChip60K SNP chip by GeneSeek (Neogene, Lincoln, NE, USA). Intensity data were first assessed using GenomeStudio V2011.1 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to recluster genotypic classes as described by Silva-Junior et al. (2015) (link). Briefly, SNPs that passed the following criteria were retained, ≥80% samples with GenCall > 0.15, genotype clusters separation > 0.3, mean normalized intensity (R) value of the heterozygote cluster > 0.2, and mean normalized theta of the heterozygote cluster between 0.2 and 0.8. SNPs that did not pass these cutoff criteria were removed from further analyses. SNP genotypes were assessed to retain markers ascertained in at least 80% of samples with minor allele frequency (MAF) more than 0.01. Two alternative SNP datasets were also generated by retaining only SNPs with MAF ≥ 0.01 and MAF ≥ 0.05, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Leaf DNA Extraction for Fruit Accessions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Young leaf material was collected from accessions in the National Fruit Collection, Brogdale Farm, UK. Leaf material was stored at -20°C prior to DNA extraction. DNA extracts were carried out using Macherey Nagel Nucleospin® 96 Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG) according to the kit instructions. Samples of purified DNA were supplied to DArT Pty Ltd. for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted Sequencing of Conifer DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were freeze-dried prior to DNA extraction except for megagametophytes, which were excised from pine seeds and ground fresh. Samples were ground using a MiniG® tissue homogenizer (SPEX Sample Prep, Metuchen, NJ) and 5/32-inch stainless steel balls. DNA was extracted from all samples using the NucleoSpin®96 Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel).
DNA was submitted to RAPiD Genomics (Gainesville, FL, USA), for library construction, target enrichment, and sequencing, following protocols previously described for loblolly pine (Neves et al. 2013 (link)). Briefly, an average of 500 ng of DNA was sheared to an average fragment length of 300–500 bp, end-repaired and ligated to Illumina TruSeq compatible adapters containing unique indexes to identify the samples upon sequencing. Properly ligated libraries were enriched by PCR and hybridized to the probes following Agilent’s SureSelect protocol. A total of 334 target-enriched libraries were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 machine using a paired-end 150 bp cycle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genotyping of Hemp and Marijuana Germplasm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The marijuana strains genotyped in this study were provided by author DH (grown by Health Canada authorized producers) and represent germplasm grown and used for breeding in the medical and recreational marijuana industries (S2 Table). Hemp strains were provided by author JV (Health Canada hemp cultivation licensee), and represent modern seed and fibre cultivars grown in Canada as well as diverse European and Asian germplasm (S3 Table). DNA was extracted from hemp leaf tissue using a Qiagen DNeasy plant mini kit, and from marijuana leaves using a Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin 96 Plant II kit with vacuum manifold processing. Library preparation and sequencing were performed using the GBS protocol published by Sonah et al [15 (link)]. The raw sequence has been deposited in the NIH Sequence Read Archive (SRA), under BioProject PRJNA285813. SNPs with a read depth of 10 or more were called using the GBS pipeline developed by Gardner et al. [16 (link)], aligning to the canSat3 C. sativa reference genome assembly [3 (link)]. Quality filtering of genetic markers was performed in PLINK 1.07 [17 (link)] by removing SNPs with (i) greater than 20% missingness by locus (ii) a minor allele frequency less than 1% and (iii) excess heterozygosity (a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-value less than 0.0001). After filtering, 14,031 SNPs remained for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Extraction and Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from lyophilized plant tissues using NucleoSpin 96 Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany), following the manufacturer's instructions. Quality of genomic DNA was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantity was estimated using Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA).
Two genomic libraries (96 + 9 including one negative control each), were prepared using the Pst1 restriction enzyme according to the procedures published in [27 (link)], with the modification that adapters were designed with a PstI overhang (S1 Table). Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2000, version 3 chemistry. Each library was sequenced on two flowcell lanes to achieve the equivalent of 48-plex pooling. All these steps were performed at the Cornell University Biotechnology Resource Center (BRC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Isolation and SSR Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue of 16 randomly selected individuals from each population. A set of 720 DNA samples (45 populations × 16 individuals) were isolated along with the control sample Tift 23D2B1 using NucleoSpin® 96 Plant II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Electrophoresis (0.8% agarose gel) was performed to test the quality of the DNA and quantified based on lambda DNA (MBI Fermentas, USA). The final working DNA samples were normalized uniformly at a concentration of 10 ng/µl.
Twenty-nine SSR markers (Supplementary Table 2), identified as highly polymorphic and distributed over all the seven linkage groups based on earlier studies66 (link),67 (link) were used. The detailed methodology followed for DNA extraction, SSR genotyping protocol and allele calling using Genemapper 4.0 (Applied Biosysterms) is explained in Patil et al.46 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf tissue was collected using a hole punch from each accession in each cross once, and collected in duplicate from both sets of parents. Punched tissue was dried using a freeze dryer before being shipped to the AAFC Kentville Research and Development Centre in Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada for DNA extraction. Tissue was lyophilized and then ground using a 2010 Geno/Grinder (SPEX SamplePrep, Metuchen, NJ, USA). Whole-genome DNA was extracted using a NucleoSpin 96 Plant II kit (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany) with the following modifications to the kit protocol: samples were incubated in lysis buffer for 60 min, and were processed using a vacuum manifold with an additional step of filtering lysate through receiver plates before proceeding to the binding step. DNA samples were quantified using the QuantiFluor dsDNA System and the GloMax-Multi+Microplate Multimode Reader with Instinct (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
Library preparation and DNA sequencing were performed at L’Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS) at Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 and the GBS approach,26 (link) with the restriction enzyme ApeKI.34 (link) Each F1 progeny was sequenced once, while each parent in each cross was sequenced in duplicate as recommended by Gardner et al.35
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction from Tomato Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the extraction of genomic DNA approximately 25 mg of dried root material of each tomato accession was weighed and inserted in a 96 deep well plate. Samples were freeze dried for 1 week using a freeze dryer (Christ Alpha 1-4 LD plus, Germany). For the extraction of DNA a Nucleospin 96 Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) was used and the manufacturer's protocol was followed. The quality of the gDNA was checked on a 1.5% agarose gel. The concentration of the gDNA was calculated using the Quanti-iTTM PicoGREEN dsDNA assay kit (Invitrogen). gDNA was diluted in TE buffer pH 8.0 (10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA) and stored at 4°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Leaf DNA Extraction Using NucleoSpin 96 Kit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA extraction from the pooled leaf samples of each plot was carried out using the Macherey‐Nagel NucleoSpin 96 Plant II kit (robot extraction) following the manufacturer's protocol. We used both provided lysis buffers separately (cetrimonium bromide [CTAB] lysis buffer PL1 and a sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]‐based lysis buffer PL2) to enhance the amount of extracted DNA. Five microliters of product was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies) and the broad‐range assay kit following the manufacturer's protocol before equally pooling the extracts from the same plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chickpea Breeding for Fe and Zn Biofortification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mapping population consisting of 188 F2 plants was developed from a cross between MNK-1 and Annigeri 1. MNK-1 is a kabuli type, extra-large-seeded chickpea variety having Fe and Zn concentrations of 72.88 and 30.98 mg kg−1, respectively. Annigeri 1 is a desi-type, medium seed size variety having Fe and Zn concentrations of 98.67 and 37.07 mg kg−1, respectively. Fresh, young leaves were collected from parental lines, and each F2 individual and high-quality genomic DNA was extracted using high throughput NucleoSpin® 96 Plant II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. The DNA was quantified using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV160A, Japan) and used to prepare the GBS library for SNP discovery. Individual F2 plants were selfed, and seeds harvested were advanced to develop an F2:3 population for phenotyping seed Fe and Zn contents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!