The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

105 protocols using d max 2400

1

Photocatalytic Activity of Cu2O-TiO2 Heterojunction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7000F, JEOL Inc., Japan) with energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used for the observation of the morphology and structure. The samples were characterized by a D/max-2400 X-ray diffraction spectrometer (Rigaku, D/max-2400, Japan) and a UV-vis spectrometry (Ultrospec 2100 pro) was also used. To evaluate the photocatalytic activity of the as-synthesized Cu2O-TiO2 NTA heterojunction, we took methyl orange (MO), a typical organic indicator, as the degraded object. The Cu2O-TiO2 NTA films (3.0 × 1.5 cm2) were immersed in 5 × 10−5 mol/L of MO aqueous solution and irradiated with seven 4 W visible bulbs (Toshiba, Cool white, FL4W, Japan). Then, the solution was magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min to ensure adsorption-desorption equilibrium prior to photocatalytic degradation. Photodegradation experiments lasted 180 min with 1.5 mL samples withdrawn periodically. The concentration of the residual MO was measured by a spectrophotometer at about 460 nm on the basis of the Beer-Lambert law. The degradation efficiency of the MO could be defined as follows: Ct/C0=At/A0×100%
And the varying of At/A0 referred to the changing in Ct, which represented the photocatalytic activity of the tested samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morphological and Structural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6701) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, TECNAI TF20). The crystal structures and compositions of the as-prepared samples were characterized by using X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max-2400, Rigaku, Cu Kα, 0.154056 nm). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer PHI ESCA system. Specific surface areas were measured by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) nitrogen adsorption–desorption (Micromeritics ASAP 2020 Instrument, USA) and pore-size distributions were calculated by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method using the desorption branch of the isotherm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Nanomaterial Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images and EDX spectroscopy elemental mapping analyses were obtained with a FEI model Quanta microscope at accelerating voltages of 15–30 kV. TEM images were obtained with a FEI Tecnai G2 microscope. XRD patterns were obtained with a Rigaku D/MAX 2400 instrument with a Cu source. XPS analyses were conducted with an Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV) and a hemispherical concentric analyzer (CLAM2–VG Microtech). Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) (Brook Vertex 70) was used to identify the related functional groups in the catalyst.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Microstructure Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure and morphology were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL, JEM-2010, Japan), field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL, JSM-6700F, Japan), and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a Rigaku D/MAX 2400 diffractometer (Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) operating at 40 kV and 60 mA. Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out in air, and in nitrogen at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 on a NETZSCH STA 449F3, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Composite Materials by XRD, SEM, and Particle Size Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specificities of the crystal structure and phase compositions were studied by XRD using Cu-Kα radiation (Rigaku D/MAX-2400, Japan). The chemical compositions and microstructures were investigated by SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Japan) with EDX. The particle size distribution of the composites was examined by the analysis of the images obtained using SEM. The proportion of the particle area Pi was determined for each fraction using the following equation: where ai is the size of a certain particle (or diameter of a disk that has size equal to the size of particles), S is the total analyzed area, and n is number of particles with a specified size.
The specific surface area (SSA) of one gram of composite [m2 g−1] was calculated as follows: where pi is the content of each fraction [%] and Si is the surface area of the particles of a certain fraction, which was obtained as where ρ is the radiographic or XRD density of composites [g cm−3] that was calculated using the following equation: where N0 is the Avogadro constant (6.02214 × 1023 mol−1), A is the atomic weight of each component in the composite, and Z is the number of atoms in a unit cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Synthesized Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The composition and phase purity of the as-synthesized samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with monochromatized Cu-Kα incident radiation by a Rigaku D/Max-2400 instrument operating at 12 kV voltage. The size and morphology of the samples were characterized by a Hitachi Su3500 scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (XFlash 5030, Bruker, Germany), along with a field–emission transmission electron microscope (TEM, Tecnai F30, USA). AFM analysis was conducted on a PicoScanTM 2500(USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded on an ESCALAB 250 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) to characterize the surface composition. The complex permittivity and permeability were measured using the waveguide technique at the frequency range of 1−18 GHz with an Agilent 8720ET network analyzer. These products were uniformly blended with paraffin matrix with a mass ratio of 1:2, and the mixture was cast into a ring mold with thickness of 2.0 mm, inner diameter of 3 mm, and outer diameter of 7 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sanded discs were used for XRD analysis. The phase compositions of the samples were analyzed with a Rigaku DMAX 2400 X-ray diffractometer with a Cu source (λ = 1.5406 Å). The scanning range was set to 10 °–90° and the scanning speed was 4°/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural and Elemental Analysis of Sulfur-Enriched Porous Wood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structures of OMPW were obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL 6300F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The porous structure and elemental analyses of OMPW and sulfer/OMPW (S/OMPW) was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum was recorded with a Bruker Tensor 27 Spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns were carried out on a Rigaku D/Max-2400 (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, STA 409 PC Luxx, Netzsch, Selb, Germany) was performed under Ar atmosphere to determine the S content of the S/OMPW composite. Nitrogen (77 K) adsorption-desorption isotherms were conducted using a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020 analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) investigation was carried out by using a PHI model 5700 spectrometer (Physical Electronics, Chanhassen, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Characterization of COFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD (DMAX-2400, Rigaku, Japan), XPS (Axis Ultra, Kratos, UK), SEM (JSM-F100, JEOL, Japan), TEM (Tecnai F30, USA), 13C NMR (Bruker-400 AVANCE III, Bruker, Switzerland), FTIR (Nicolet is50, Thermo Fisher, USA) were employed to reveal the chemical and structural information of COFs. In-situ FTIR spectra measurement (Bruker Tensor, Bruker, Switzerland), UV-vis DRS (UV-2400, Shimadzu, Japan), steady state PL spectra, time-resolved PL decay curve, temperature-dependent PL spectra (FLS980, Edinburgh, UK), TA spectrometer (Helios, Ultrafast System, USA), ESR analysis (Bruker EMX, Bruker, Switzerland), water adsorption analysis (3Flex, Micromeritics, USA), RRDE (PINE E6, USA), 18O isotopic experiment and EIS (CHI760E, Chenhua, China) were performed to investigate the mechanisms of H2O2 photosynthesis by prepared COFs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multi-Technique Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential scanning calorimetry thermogravimetric (DSC/TG) curves were obtained in air at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 using a NETZSCH STA 449C thermal analyzer. The crystal phase composition of the product was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max-2400) with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) using CuKα radiation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F), and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM, FEI, Tecnai G2 F20). And the atomic information in the crystal was collected to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo VG ESCALAB 250), Raman microscope (voltage: 100–240 V, power: 150 W; RENISHAW Invia, UK), BET surface-area and pore-size analyzer (Quantachrome Autosorb-6B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!