The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using omics explorer 2

1

Differential lncRNA Expression in HHT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analyses were performed using the Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 software (Qlucore). Differentially expressed lncRNAs comparing telangiectasial and non-telangiectasial tissue were ranked according to statistical significance determined by two-group comparison (paired t-test). This was done for the groups HHT1 and HHT2 seperately and subsequently for the total group of HHT. Multiple testing was adjusted for by the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Differentially expressed lncRNAs were chosen for further evaluation (q<0.15). Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering were performed in Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 to examine whether telangiectasial and non-telangiectasial samples could be separated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gene Expression Profiling of GHD Severity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to explore possible mechanisms related to the GHRd3-GHD severity association, GE profiling was performed at baseline on whole blood RNA extracted centrally by qLAB using the PAXgene 96 blood RNA kit (Qiagen). Reduction of globin messenger RNA was undertaken using the Ambion GLOBIN Clear Human kit (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). Complementary RNA was generated using the Two-Cycle Eukaryotic Target Labelling kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) before hybridization to Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays.
Processing and normalization of GE data from each patient were performed using a Robust Multi-array Average background correction modified for probe sequence with quantile normalization and median polish (Partek Genomics Suite, version 6.3, St Louis, MO, USA). Confounding effects due to variations in cell populations and outliers were examined by cross validation using principal component analysis and iso-map multidimensional scaling (Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.2, Qlucore, Lund, Sweden).
The relationships between basal GE and GHD severity and basal GE and carriage of the GHRd3 polymorphism were assessed using rank regression and ANOVA as appropriate, adjusting for gender, ethnicity, age and baseline BMI as potential confounding factors (Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimal lncRNA Profile Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The above-mentioned classification resulted in the same number of different models and lncRNA gene sets as the number of pairs unsuitable for validation in independent datasets. To obtain optimal gene profiles for validation purposes, we used the entire dataset for feature selection as described above. We evaluated the performance of the optimal classifier using LOPOCV by adding one feature at a time in a top-down selection starting with the top two features of the ranked genes, thereby, optimizing the number of genes for obtaining 90% sensitivity, together with the highest specificity with a specified gene list.
Heatmaps of the optimal lncRNA profiles were used to visualize the patterns of expression in the different samples. The normalized log ratios from the lncRNA list were mean-centered within each lncRNA. We produced all heatmaps in Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 (Qlucore, Lund, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptomic Analysis of Aggressor Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normalized data were filtered on flags to exclude probes, which have missing values in more than one sample, and these were tissue-wise quantile normalized using the Limma Package of R program (www.r-project.org). Normalized data were analyzed using Agilent’s Genespring GX v12.0, the Limma package of R, and Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 (Qlucore AB, Lund, Sweden). Each brain region at each time point (T5R1, T5R10, T10R1, and T10R42) was compared for aggressor exposure effects: Aggressor-Exposed (Agg-E) vs. Control (C-ctrl). DEGs in each tissue and time point were identified using a Moderated T-test at p < 0.05 of the Limma Package of R.
Time effects were also compared using TimeClust [64 (link)] across different combinations of aggressor exposure sessions and rest periods (T5R1, T5R10, T10R1, and T10R42).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptomic Profiling of Growth Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcriptomic profiling was carried out on whole blood RNA as described previously [7 (link)] using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 Arrays. For background correction, the Robust Multichip Average was applied with quantile normalisation and a mean probe set summarisation using Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 ([QOE] Qlucore, Lund, Sweden). The data set generated was subject to quality control to investigate the presence of outliers and further confounding effects.
Baseline gene expression associations with height velocity in each year of growth response were determined using rank regression with microarray batch, age, body mass index (BMI) at baseline as covariates (eliminated factor function in QOE) for both GHD and TS patients along with gender and peak GH test response (average of two provocative tests) for the GHD patients. Over the study, a number of children either entered puberty spontaneously or received exogenous sex steroids for pubertal induction. We therefore introduced a further normalisation for Tanner stage to the analysis to account for the proportion of children entering puberty in each year of the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gene Expression Data Standardization for PCA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Principal component analysis (PCA) plots were generated using data where the expression level of each gene had been standardized to zero mean and unit variance by Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 (Qlucore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Associating Functional Gene Sets to lncRNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to associate functional gene sets to each lncRNA in the top of the profiles, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). We used the highest ranked lncRNA of the profiles, and computed the Pearson correlation coefficient for each lncRNA-mRNA combination. mRNAs were then ranked according to the Pearson correlation coefficient to generate ranked gene lists for GSEA. GSEA was performed by the JAVA program [30 ] using the MSigDB C2 CP: REACTOME gene set collection (674 gene sets). Gene sets with a false discovery rate (FDR) value <0.05 after performing 1,000 permutations were considered significant [31 (link)].
Relative expression levels of the top lncRNAs, in different subtypes, both in our dataset and in the Affymetrix validation datasets were visualized by box plots and tested for significant associations with the molecular subtypes using the t-test. All plots and tests were performed in Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 (Qlucore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Supervised Classification of Proteomic Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Log2 standardized abundances were used and duplicate injections were merged. Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed using Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.3 software (Qlucore AB, Lund, Sweden). Multi-group comparison was done using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and complete linkage was used for hierarchal clustering. Supervised classification was performed with a support vector machine. Leave one out cross-validation was employed and only binary classifiers were used with no seed. Every sample was left out once, and the remaining samples were used as the training set. The sample left out was tested on the resulting classifier and a decision value was obtained. Large positive and negative decision values correspond to predictions in the two classes respectively. Varying the threshold decision value between the two classes produces a set of classifiers. Corresponding values of sensitivity and selectivity are plotted as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The library e1071 (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071/index.html) was used for the support vector machine. Default parameters and a linear kernel were used for the classifier. Only peptides without missing values were used for the classifier and values were logarithmically transformed and normalized. All statistics was performed in R. ROC curves are provided in Additional file 6: Figure S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microarray Analysis of Sorted IL-17+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sorted IL-17+ cell samples were lysed in 500 μl of TRIzol (Invitrogen). Chloroform (0.2 ml) was added to 1 ml TRIzol cell homogenate and whirl mixed for 15 sec. Homogenates were incubated 2-3 min at RT and centrifuged 15 min at 10,000g (4°C). The water phase containing the RNA was further purified using RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). RNA integrity was confirmed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using total RNA nano chips (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). An amount of 100 ng of total RNA was used to prepare targets by 3′ IVT Express kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Hybridization cocktails were hybridized onto Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Gene Chips® (Affymetrix) at 45°C for 17 h (60 rpm) in a Hybridization Oven 640 (Affymetrix). GeneChips® were washed and stained in a GeneChip® fluidics station 450 using the fluidics protocol “EukGE-WS2v5_450” (Affymetrix). Chips were scanned in a GeneChip® scanner 3000 (Affymetrix). Microarray data were normalized and gene expression measures derived using the RMA algorithm and the Bioconductor package “Affy” (http://www.bioconductor.org). Custom CDF (chip definition file) from brainarray.mbni.med.umich.edu was used. Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.2 (Qlucore AB, Sweden) was used for the statistical analysis of the normalized data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical testing was performed with GraphPad 5.03 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Datasets were tested for normality using the D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test, followed by statistical significance testing using the appropriate statistical tests as indicated in the legends. Datasets with n-values less than 8 were always tested non-parametrically. For analysis of the microarray data, for each gene, a paired t-test was performed to compare the expression levels between the conditions (Adalimumab and control), using Qlucore Omics Explorer 2.2 (Qlucore AB, Sweden). Adjusted p-values (or q-values) were computed using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. P-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Evolutionarily conserved regions (70% similarity over 100 bp) were identified with ECR Browser57 (link) aligned by Mulan and searched for conserved Aiolos motifs by multiTF58 (link), 59 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!