The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using 2 3 pentanedione

1

Differentiated NHBE Cells Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normal Human Bronchial Epithelial (NHBE) cells were gifted from Marsico Lung Institute/Cystic Fibrosis Center at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Chapel Hill, NC) and were cultured as previously described75 (link). Cells at passage 2 were transferred to microporous polyester inserts (0.4 mm pore size, Transwell-Clear; Corning Costar, Corning, NY) and fed with a 1:1 mixture of BEBM and Dulbecco’s Modification of Eagle’s Media (DMEM; Mediatech,Herndon, VA) supplemented with the same components detailed above and as previously described. Media was applied apically and basally until the cells were confluent and then basally after an air–liquid interface (ALI) was established. Cells were cultured at ALI for 14 days to promote relatively stable expression of goblet and ciliated cells before exposure to e-cig chemicals or mixture. Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione were diluted into culture medium, then mature, well-differentiated monolayers of cells were then exposed to control (medium), Diacetyl (Sigma), or 2,3-pentanedione (Sigma) on the apical side for 24 h (n = 3 subjects, each treatment was performed in duplicate). Total RNA samples for RNA-Seq were isolated using miRNeasy kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents of analytical grade were used as received from their commercial sources. Benzyl chloride was obtained from ACROS Organics (Morris Plains, NJ, USA), potassium hydroxide from Riendemann Schmidt (Kajang, Malaysia), carbon disulfide from Fisher Scientific (Chino, CA, USA) and copper (II) acetate from R&M Chemicals (Essex, UK). Hydrazine hydrate, iodomethane, glyoxal, 2,3-hexanedione, 2,3-heptanedione, 2,3-pentanedione, 2,3-butanedione and copper (II) chloride were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Absolute ethanol, 95% ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide, acetone and dimethylformamide were obtained from RCI Labscan (Bangkok, Thailand). Elemental analysis was conducted via a Vario MACRO CUBE CHNS analyser (Germany), while IR spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer FTIR spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA). Melting points were measured using an Electrothermal IA9100 melting point apparatus (Essex, UK).
1H NMR spectra were obtained via a Bruker FT-NMR 300 MHz (Germany). TLC was performed via 60F aluminium silica gel aluminium plates with a 254 nm fluorescent indicator from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). UV-Vis spectroscopy was performed via a Biochrom UltroSpec 8000 spectrophotometer (Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals for synthesis of the complexes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) (copper(II) chloride dihydrate (≥99.99% trace metals basis), zinc(II) chloride, 2,3-pentanedione (97%), 1-phenyl-1,3-butanedione (99%) and 3-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole (96%)) and Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) (dibenzo-18-crown-6-ether, potassium superoxide) as reagent grade and were used as received, without further purification. The 5-methyl-7-phenyl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine (mptp) was obtained by [1 + 1] condensation of 3-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole and 1-phenyl-1,3-butanedione while 5,7-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine (dmtp) was synthesized by [1 + 1] condensation of 3-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole and 2,3-pentanedione, as was reported in the literature [49 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis of Copper(II) Complexes with Heterocyclic Ligands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals for the synthesis of the complexes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) (copper(II) perchlorate hexahydrate (≥99.99% trace metals basis), 2,2′-biyridine (bpy, 99%), 1,10-phenantroline (phen, 99%), 2,3-pentanedione (97%) and 3-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole (96%)) and Merck (Darmstadt, Germany; dibenzo-18-crown-6-ether, potassium superoxide) at reagent grade and were used as received, without further purification. The 5,7-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine (dmtp) was synthesized by [1+1} condensation of 3-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole and 2,3-pentanedione.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNPH-based Carbonyl Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI, Portland, OR); d3-labeled DNPH (>98% isotopic purity) and malondialdehyde (MDA) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX); Ketones Mix (Propanone, 2-Butanone, 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone, 2-Hexanone, Cyclohexanone) and TO11/IP-6A Aldehyde/Ketone-DNPH Mix (Acetaldehyde-DNPH, Propanone-DNPH, Propanal-DNPH, Acrolein-DNPH, Benzaldehyde-DNPH, Butanal-DNPH, Crotonaldehyde-DNPH, 2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde-DNPH, Formaldehyde-DNPH, Hexanal-DNPH, Pentanal-DNPH, Isopentanal-DNPH, o-Tolualdehyde-DNPH, m-Tolualdehyde-DNPH, p-Tolualdehyde-DNPH), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (Vanillin), Indole-3-carboxaldehyde, Hexanophenone, Heptanophenone, 2,3-Butanedione, 2,3-Pentanedione, trans-2-methyl-2-butenal, 3-methyl-2-butenal (methylcrotonaldehyde), sodium acetate, and concentrated HCl were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI); 13C2-Acetaldehyde was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Tewksbury, MA); Methylglyoxal (MG) was obtained from Thermo Fisher (Morris Plains, NJ); Strata-X polymeric reverse-phase cartridge was purchased from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA). All acids and organic solvents were HPLC grade or better.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Olfactory Chemotaxis and Avoidance Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol for olfactory assays was adopted from Bargmann et al. (1993) (link). The volatile odorants were diluted in ethanol, which was used as the neutral control. Chemotaxis assays were conducted with indicated concentrations of butanone, benzaldehyde, IAA, 2,3-pentanedione, TMT, diacetyl, pyrazine or 1-octanol (Sigma-Aldrich). One microliter of 1 m sodium azide (Sigma-Aldrich) was dropped in advance to both odorant and control spots to paralyze animals reaching them. Assay plates with 150–200 animals were incubated for 120 min at 20°C, after which plates were moved to 4°C to stop animal movements. Chemotaxis indices (CI = O − C/O + C) were calculated as the number of animals that moved toward the attractive odorant (O) minus the number of animals toward the control (C), divided by the total number of animals. Avoidance indices were calculated similarly, but taken into account the number of animals that moved away from the repellent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chemotaxis Assay for C. elegans Attraction and Repulsion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B. subtilis 168- or B. subtilis DG101-fed N2 (10 days-old adults) worms were collected, washed three times with M9 buffer (Cogliati et al., 2020 (link)), and seeded in 10 cm Petri dishes prepared with NGMA without food for 1 h. Then, approximately 75 worms were placed in the center of 6 cm plates prepared with NGMA. After all the animals were transferred to the center of the assay plates, 2 μL of attractant or repellent were seeded 2 cm from the center of the plate, and 2 μL of solvent (control) in which the attractant or repellent was diluted were seeded equidistantly. Both the attractant, repellent, and solvent (control) were added with a 1-μL drop of 1 M azide. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 25°C. Then, worms found at each end of the plates were counted, and the chemotaxis index (CI) was calculated (Bargmann et al., 1993 (link)). The attractant compounds used for the assays were 0.5% diacetyl (DA, Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in ethanol and 1 mM isoamyl alcohol (IAA; Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in water, 1 mM 2,3-pentanedione and 1 mM 2-butanone (Sigma-Aldrich). The repellent compounds used for the assays were 0.3% octanol and 15% 2-nonanone (Sigma-Aldrich). The CI was defined as the number of worms at the attractant or repellent location—the number of worms at the control location divided by the total number of worms on the plate (Bargmann et al., 1993 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Volatile Compounds Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standards of most volatile compounds were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China): 1-octen-3-ol (98%), (E)-2-octen-1-ol (97%), 1-heptanol (98%), propanal (97%), pentanal (98%), hexanal (98%), heptanal (97%), octanal (99%), (E)-2-octenal (97%), nonanal (99.5%), (E)-2-nonenal (97%), benzaldehyde (99.5%), 2-pentylfuran (98%), and 2,3-pentanedione (97%). The 3-methylbutanal (98%) was supplied by Aladdin (Shanghai, China). The n-alkanes (C7-C40, ≥97%, external standard) was obtained from o2si Smart Solutions (Shanghai, China). The 2-methyl-3-heptanone (99%) was supplied by Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Beijing, China) as an internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flavoring Low-Salt Cheese with Aroma Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The commercial cheeses used in this study were a regular salt cheese (RSC) and a low-salt cheese (LSC, –33% salt) from Orval Abbey (Villers-devant-Orval, Belgium). These are semihard cheeses, pertaining to the “Trappist” cheese category. For RSC as for LSC, dry matter was 54%, fat in dry matter: 58%, moisture on fat-free cheese: 61%, fat content: 32%, pH: 5.24. Salt content was 1.78% for RSC and 1.19% for LSC. RSC and LSC were made with pasteurized cow milk, rennet, lactic ferment, and salts. Salts were incorporated in the cheese curd by brining during different times. LSC and RSC came each one from the same brining batch. In addition, after grating, the pieces of cheese were mixed to obtain portions whose homogeneity in salt content was controlled.
A salt-congruent complex aroma, reminiscent of the odor of smoked sardine (Givaudan, Argenteuil, France) and further called the “sardine aroma,” and a fat-congruent aroma compound, 2,3-pentanedione (Sigma–Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France), reminiscent of the odor of butter and further called the “butter aroma,” were used to flavor the low-salt cheeses. These aromas were dissolved in propylene glycol (Sigma–Aldrich). All materials were food-grade quality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Flavor Compound Procurement for Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diethyl ether, dansyl chloride, and saturated
alkane standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, Dorset,
UK). O-(2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorobenzyl)-hydroxylamine
hydrochloride (PFBHA) was purchased from Fluka (Loughborough, UK).
The following food-grade aroma compounds were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(purity in parenthesis): acetaldehyde (≥99%), acetic acid (≥99.5%),
2,3-butanedione (97%), butanoic acid (≥99%), (E)-β-damascenone (≥98%), dimethyl sulfide (≥99%),
5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2(5H)-furanone (97%),
5(or 2)-ethyl-4-hydroxy-2(or 5)-methyl-3(2H)-furanone
(96%), (Z)-4-heptenal (≥98%), 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone (10% in propylene glycol), 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (≥98%), methional (≥97%), 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol
(≥98%), 2-methoxyphenol (≥99%), 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol
(≥98%), 2-methylbutanal (≥95%), 3-methylbutanal (≥97%),
3-methylbutanoic acid (99%), 3-methyl-1-butanol (≥98%), methylpropanal
(≥98%), 2,3-pentanedione (≥96%), phenylacetaldehyde
(10% in ethanol), 2-phenylacetic acid (≥99%), 2-phenylethanol
(≥99%), vanillin (≥97%), and 4-vinylphenol (10% in propylene
glycol). Encapsulated 3-methyl-2-butene-1-thiol flavor standard (0.02–4
ng/g) was purchased from FlavorActiV (Aston Rowant, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!