The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statview

Manufactured by Abacus
Sourced in United States, Japan

StatView is a data analysis software designed for scientific and statistical applications. It provides tools for data visualization, statistical analysis, and reporting. StatView's core function is to enable users to import, manage, and analyze data efficiently.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

236 protocols using statview

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Replicates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses of data from three or four replicates for comparison were carried out by either Student's t‐test or one‐way ANOVA followed by Student's t‐test (Statview; Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA). In Figure 3 and Figure 4, the data obtained from three different cultures were carried out by a two‐way ANOVA (Statview; Abacus Concepts, Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparing Surgical Outcomes and Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences between two normally distributed parameters were compared using the χ2 test and Fisher's exact probability test. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used to assess the correlation between the two numerical parameters (preoperative and postoperative PNI). The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare differences between two parameters with non-normal distributions. Long-term overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the prognostic difference between the two groups was compared using the log-rank test. All data were analyzed by StatView software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA). A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Oxygen Saturation and Morphological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical measurements were performed using Stat-View (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). For oxygen saturation, two-factorial (way) analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with group and time as the main factors. Student’s t-test was used for comparison of diameters, distance from the pial surface to MHs, and CC thickness. Changes were identified as significant for values of p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Replicates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from three replicates were compared using either Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (Statview; Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA). All values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between treatments were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Non-Parametric Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non‐parametric analyses (Mann‐Whitney U test and log‐rank test) were performed using StatView (Abacus Concepts, Berkley, CA, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mortality risk factors in diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Given that the duration of diabetes and urinary albumin showed markedly skewed distributions, these were expressed as a median (interquartile rage), and logarithmic transformation (log) was carried out before performing correlation analysis. Statistical evaluations for differences between two groups were carried out using Student’s t test for parametric variables, or Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric variables. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the risk of mortality, in a model adjusted for confounding factors. Statistical analyses were performed using a statistical computer program StatView (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Developmental and Growth Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of data for developmental rates, body weight, and feed consumption was performed using one‐way analysis of variance and Student's t test using Statview software (Abacus Concepts, Inc, Berkeley, CA). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data was analyzed using variance analysis (ANOVA), followed by Tukey-Kramer
tests. For all data, p<0.05 was considered significant. All
analyses were conducted using StatView (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA,
USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data is all presented as mean ± SEM in the text and figures (Igor Pro, WaveMetrics, Inc., Lake Oswego, OR). Student t-tests, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (K-S) tests were used to examine the difference between means and distributions using Statview (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA). Fisher’s protected least significant difference (Fisher’s PLSD) tests were used for pairwise comparison of groups following an ANOVA test. Chi-squared tests were performed using equations coded in Excel (Microsoft Crop., Redmond, WA, USA). The level of statistical significance was set at 5%. In all figures, * indicates P<0.05; ** indicates P<0.01; and *** indicates P<0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Findings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as means±SD. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA (StatView; Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, California, USA). All experiments were performed in at least triplicate on separate days. Differences were considered significant at P-values <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!