The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

607 protocols using qx200 droplet reader

1

Quantitative Analysis of miRNA-mRNA Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from immunoprecipitates and cultures using the RNeasy Micro isolation kit (QIAGEN). Fluorimetry with Ribogreen (Invitrogen) was used to determine RNA quantities. For analyses of total RNA levels and inputs for miR-mRNA co-precipitation analyses, RNA yields were normalized across samples before reverse transcription using Sensifast (Bioline). For quantitating mRNAs co-precipitating with biotinylated miRs (see below), equal proportions of each precipitation were used for reverse transcription with Sensifast. RT products were processed for ddPCR using Evagreen (Bio-Rad) with transcript specific primers (Integrated DNA Tech; sequences available on request). ddPCR reactions were read on a QX200 droplet reader (Bio-Rad).
For miR quantification, tissues and cultures were lysed and total RNA was isolated using the miRVana miRNA Isolation kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Ribogreen assay was performed to determine the RNA quantity in each sample. Equal amounts of total RNA were reverse transcribed using the miRCURY LNA miRNA RT kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s protocol. After RT, the miRNAs were detected using miR-specific primers (Exiqon) by ddPCR with Evagreen detection reagent (Bio-Rad) and QX200 droplet reader.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Gene Expression via ddPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was carried out using the ddPCRTM Supermix for Probes (No dUTP), the QX200TM Droplet Generator, the QX200 Droplet Reader, the C1000 TouchTM Thermal Cycler and the PX1TM PCR Plate Sealer (BIO-RAD, Hercules, California, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions were performed in triplicate in a 96 well plate using 10 μL/reaction of 2 × ddPCR Supermix for Probes (No dUTP), 1 μL/reaction of 20 × target primers/probe (FAM or HEX, BIO-RAD), 1 μL/reaction 20x reference primers/probe (FAM or HEX, BIO-RAD), 3 μL cDNA and 5 μL H2O. Detection of Ctgf and Gapdh by ddPCR was performed using the following PrimePCR™ ddPCR™ Expression Probe Assay designed by BIO-RAD: CTGF-FAM (ID: qMmuCEP0053713) and GAPDH-HEX (ID: dMmuCPE5195283, BIO-RAD). All steps used a ramp rate of 2˚C/s. Results were analyzed in the QX200 Droplet Reader, the RNA targets were quantified using the QuantaSoftTM Software (BIO-RAD), and results were normalized to the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of CXCL12 and GAPDH by ddPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was carried out using the ddPCRTM Supermix for Probes (No dUTP), the QX200TM Droplet Generator, the QX200 Droplet Reader, the C1000 TouchTM Thermal Cycler, and the PX1TM PCR Plate Sealer (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following manufacturer's instructions. Reactions were performed in triplicate in a 96‐well plate using 10 μl/reaction of 2× ddPCR Supermix for Probes (No dUTP), 1 μl/reaction of 20× target primers/probe (FAM or HEX, Bio‐Rad), 1 μl/reaction of 20× reference primers/probe (FAM or HEX, Bio‐Rad), 3 μl cDNA and 5 μl H2O. Detection of CXCL12 and GAPDH by ddPCR was performed using the following PrimePCR™ ddPCR™ Expression Probe Assay designed by Bio‐Rad: CXCL12‐FAM (ID: dMmuCPE511627, Bio‐Rad) and GAPDH‐HEX (ID: dMmuCPE5195283, Bio‐Rad). All steps used a ramp rate of 2°C/s. Results were analyzed in the QX200 Droplet Reader, the RNA targets were quantified using the QuantaSoftTM Software (Bio‐Rad), and results were expressed as fractional abundance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Droplet Digital PCR for Cochlear SCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS-purified adult cochlear SCs were collected from P60 LfngEGFP mice as detailed previously. RNA was isolated from 30,000 GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells with each assay standardized to 2,000 cells per sample collected in triplicates to use for the quantification experiment. The ddPCR Droplets were generated using the QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital. PCR was performed as described in the QX200TM ddPCRTM EvaGreen® Supermix instructions2. Droplets were read with a QX200TM Droplet Reader (BioRad) and analyzed with QuantaSoft software (BioRad). Primer sequences utilized for ddPCR are provided in the Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Ncl mRNA Levels in DRG Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RT–qPCR RNA was extracted from DRG neurons cultured in Boyden chambers as previously described (Willis & Twiss, 2011 (link)). cDNA was prepared from 500 ng of RNA, using SuperScript™ III First‐Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Scientific, 18080051). Quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) was performed using the PerfeCTa SYBR green FastMix (Quanta Biosciences) and gene‐specific primers for Inpp5f and Gapdh, on the ViiA‐7 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For RT‐ddPCR, RNA was isolated from DRG neurons, using RNeasy Microisolation Kit (QIAGEN). Fluorimetry with Ribogreen (Life Technologies) was used for RNA quantification; 20 ng of RNA was used for reverse transcription (RT) with SensiFAST cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. ddPCR was performed using custom Ncl mRNA‐specific primer sets (IDT; forward primer: 5′CGGAAGAGGCGGATTTGG3′; reverse primer: 5′GGAAAGAATGGGATGGAAGGA3′) and detected with Evagreen using a QX200TM droplet reader (Bio‐Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Digital Droplet PCR Quantification of EBV Load

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each patient, 500 μl of blood was collected in an EDTA microtainer tube. After 5 min of centrifugation, 200 μl of plasma was separated from the blood cell pellet and replaced by an equivalent amount of 1X PBS, pH 7.4. Using the whole blood DNA extraction kit from Qiagen, DNA was isolated from the PBS resuspended blood cell pellet and total DNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We used digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) to determine EBV load in each sample by amplifying EBV BALF5 and human β-actin gene, using primers and probes shown in Table 1. The duplex ddPCR reactions were prepared in a total volume of 20 μl which contained 10 μl of ddPCR Supermix for probes (No UTP) (Bio-Rad Laboratories), and 2 sets of each primer and probe combination (0.9 μM of primers and 0.25 μM of probes). The BioRad Automated Droplet Generator (AutoDG) (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used to ensure consistent droplet generation. After the ddPCR reaction, the number of positive and negative droplets were counted by the Bio-Rad QX200TM Droplet reader and EBV viral loads quantified as copies/ng human DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Droplet Digital PCR Protocol for Blood DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from frozen blood samples with MasterPure DNA Purification Kit for Blood Version II (Epicenter). The DNA quality was tested using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen). Primers and assays for droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) of the fragments were designed by the tool on the BioRad website and by the Primer3PLus program. The finished primers and assays were obtained from BioRad or the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences. A T100TM thermal cycler, a QX200TM droplet generator, a PX1TM PCR plate sealer, and a QX200TM droplet reader were obtained from BioRad. The reaction PCR was prepared using ddPCR Supermix for Probes (BioRad). The restriction enzymes (HaeIII, EcoRI, MspI, XbaI) were added to the reaction mix to improve the distribution of DNA across the droplets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Immunoprecipitation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from immunoprecipitates and cultures using the RNeasy Microisolation kit (Qiagen). Fluorimetry with Ribogreen (Invitrogen) was used for RNA quantification. For analyses of total RNA levels and inputs for RIP analyses, RNA yields were normalized across samples prior to reverse transcription using Sensifast (Bioline). For RIP assays, an equal proportion of each RIP was used for reverse transcription with Sensifast. ddPCR products were detected using Evagreen or Taqman primer and probe sets (Biorad or Integrated DNA Tech; sequences available on request) and QX200TM droplet reader (Biorad). In GFP RIP experiment, B domain-BFP expression consistently increased G3BP1-GFP levels in the DRG neurons. So the level of mRNA precipitating with G3BP1-GFP was normalized to the G3BP1-GFP signals from immunoblotting across each sample in each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Droplet Digital PCR Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was run in duplicate during the ddPCR detection process. The ddPCR data are shown as copies/20 μL and were reported by the QX200TM Droplet Reader control software QuantaSoftTM 1.7.4 (Bio-Rad Inc.), and the data were analyzed using Excel 2013 (Microsoft Inc., Office 2013).
The samples with more than 10 000 droplets could be defined as effective data; otherwise, the sample could be reanalyzed. Each analysis batch contained one LQC (n = 4), and at least 2/3 of the QC samples must satisfy the acceptance criteria; the %CV was lower than 30%.
The threshold line was defined according to the positive and negative droplet response values of the NTC and blank per analytical batch.
The cutoff value of the positive droplet per analysis batch was calculated using the Excel determination of the LOD (Fig. 1a). The cutoff value of each analytical batch must be lower than 12. A calculated cutoff value of 12 indicates the potential presence of sample contamination, which indicates unacceptance of the analytical batch.

Data explanation of ddPCR. a Cutoff value of the positive droplet per analytical batch. b ddPCR data report process

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detecting BRAF and NRAS Mutations via ddPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from five 10-µm-thick tissue sections using the Maxwell® RSC (Promega, Madison, WI 53711-5399, USA) device according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were stored at 4 °C until use. BRAF and NRAS mutations were detected by digital droplet PCR (Biorad, Hercules, CA 94547, USA; Cat. No. 12001037, Cat. No. 12001006). Primers and probes for wild-type and mutated BRAF and NRAS genes were purchased by Biorad (Biorad, Hercules, CA 94547, USA; Cat. No. 12001037, Cat. No. 12001006). The reaction was carried out in a solution containing 10 μL of ddPCRTM Supermix for probes (no dUTP) (Biorad, Hercules, CA 94547, USA; Cat. No. 1863024), 1 μL of mutations Screening Assay, and 25 ng of DNA. The droplets were generated using a QX200TM Droplet Generator (BioRad, Hercules, CA 94547, USA). Subsequently, emulsions were transferred onto a 96-well PCR plate (Biorad, Hercules, CA 94547, USA) and submitted to PCR amplification as follows: denaturation for 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing/extension for 1 min at 55 °C, and one cycle at 98 °C for 10 min. After amplification, droplets were read in the QX200TM Droplet Reader (BioRad, Hercules, CA 94547, USA). Data analysis was performed using QuantaSoftTM software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!