The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gif xp260

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The GIF-XP260 is a high-performance microscope camera from Olympus, designed for scientific imaging applications. It features a 26-megapixel CMOS sensor and delivers excellent image quality with fast data transfer capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using gif xp260

1

Comprehensive GI Tract Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All children underwent both esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy with biopsies following presentation with chronic or recurrent GI symptoms. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed using a GIF-Q260 or GIF-XP260 (Olympus), and colonoscopy was performed using a PCF-Q260AL, GIF-Q260, or GIF-XP260 scope (Olympus).
Tissue samples were collected by endoscopic biopsy from each segment of the GI tract, including the esophagus, gastric antrum, gastric body, duodenum, terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. These biopsy specimens were immediately formalin fixed and processed by embedding in paraffin wax. Thin cross sections measuring 3 µm in thickness were cut from the paraffin block and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The eosinophil count was determined by examining five randomly selected high-power fields, with quantification of eosinophils performed at ×400 magnification using an Axioskope40 microscope (Mirax-Carl Zeiss) [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Endoscopic Evaluation of H. pylori Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-three endoscopists performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at Tada Tomohiro Institute of Gastroenterology and Proctology (Saitama, Japan). The indications for EGD were referral from a primary care physician for evaluation of epigastric symptoms, positive results from gastric disease screening by barium meal, abnormal serum pepsinogen levels, a previous history of gastroduodenal disease, or as a part of routine screening for gastric cancer. Patients who received H. pylori eradication therapy were excluded from the current study. We performed standard EGD (EVIS GIF-XP290N, GIF-XP260, GIF-XP260NS, GIF-N260; Olympus Medical Systems, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and captured esophagogastroduodenal mucosal images. Fig. 1 shows the typical images obtained by us. We did not use magnified images in this study.

Representative endoscopic images of Helicobacter pylori-positive, and –negative stomach. Atrophy and diffuse redness are seen in the presence of infection. A regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) is seen in the uninfected stomach.

Fig. 1
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating H. pylori Eradication Strategies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We enrolled consecutive patients with endoscopically proven iDU or NUD who were infected with H. pylori, which is defined as a positive rapid urease test (CLOtest; Kimbery-Clark, Roswell, GA 30076 USA) from the gastroenterology clinic in one medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. All patients were >18 years of age and had never received treatment for H. pylori. Additional exclusion criteria included: (i) consumption of antibiotics, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists, or bismuth salt during the previous four weeks; (ii) allergy or contraindications to antibiotics or PPI; (iii) previous gastric surgery; (iv) severe concomitant cardiopulmonary disease or serious hepatic/renal dysfunction or malignancy; and (v) pregnancy or lactation.
Patients received esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD; Olympus, GIF-XP 260) before enrolment to determine iDU or NUD. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathy General Hospital. The trial registration number is CGH-P104077, and the registration date is September 30,2015. Informed consent was obtatined from all patients before EGD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Esophageal Tumor Implantation in Rabbits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 h of fasting with free access to water, the rabbits were anesthetized (as noted above) and then were placed in the left lateral decubitus position. The implantation site was approximately 5 cm away from the cardia, where was the equivalent of 15 cm away from the incisors of the rabbit. A slim endoscope (Olympus GIFXP260, Japan) was inserted into the thoracic esophagus. Using a fine needle (the inner core of an endoscopic needle, Olympus, MAJ-68, 23-gauge, Fig. 1A), 0.5 ml of saline was injected into the esophageal submucosal layer to elevate the mucosa layer. After that, a puncture was made across the mucosa into the submucosal layer using a large needle (a revised endoscopic needle, Olympus, MAJ-68, with an oblique cut in the front, Fig. 1B) and the success of the puncture was confirmed by further elevation of the mucosa when saline was injected. Approximately 0.3 ml of saline containing four VX2 pieces was then injected into the submucosal layer of the rabbits (Video S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Endoscopic Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 33 endoscopists performed EGD at Tada Tomohiro Institute of Gastroenterology and Proctology, Saitama, Japan, from January 2014 to March 2017. Indications for EGD were referral from a primary care physician concerning current epigastric symptoms, positive results from gastric disease screening by barium contrast examination or abnormal serum pepsinogen levels, a previous history of gastro-duodenal disease, or simple screening.
GIE images were taken using standard endoscopy (GIF-XP290N, GIF-XP260, GIF-XP260NS, GIF-N260; Olympus Medical Systems, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and a standard endoscopic system (EVIS LUCERA ELITE; Olympus Medical Systems, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). All endoscopists were instructed to take whole pictures of the larynx, esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, even if there were no abnormalities. The typical number of images taken for a patient without gastrointestinal disease was 34 (larynx 1, esophagus 6, stomach 25, duodenum 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pediatric Hiatal Hernia Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EGD was performed by pediatric gastroenterologists using a GIF-Q260 or GIF-XP260 scope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, the EGD images and reports were reviewed retrospectively by a pediatric gastroenterologist. The distance between the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the diaphragmatic indentation was measured at the end of the EGD after deflating the stomach. The gastroesophageal flap valve grades 1–4 based on Hill classification were evaluated on the retroflexed views of EGD. HH was defined when the proximal displacement of the GEJ was definitely ≥ 2 cm and/or gastroesophageal flap valve grade 4 by Hill classification observed on a retroflexed view of EGD.[24 (link),25 (link)] Among children who did not fulfill the criteria for HH, ≥ 0.5 cm proximal displacement of the GEJ identified on EGD was defined as a short segment hiatal hernia (SSHH).
UGIS was performed in all study subjects, and the results of the UGIS were evaluated by pediatric radiologists. A predetermined quantity of barium was administered using a cup or straw, and if not possible, a feeding bottle or an enteric tube was used for testing. The esophagus and GEJ were observed during swallowing, and HH was diagnosed if the B ring or the upper part of the gastric folds reached ≥ 2 cm above the diaphragmatic indentation during quiet respiration.[24 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histopathologic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed using a GIF-Q260 or GIF-XP260 scope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), while colonoscopy was performed using a PCF-Q260AL, GIF-Q260, or GIF-XP260 scope (Olympus).
Endoscopic mucosal biopsies were obtained from the esophagus, gastric antrum and body, duodenum, terminal ileum, cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and rectum, respectively. Biopsy tissues were immediately fixed in formalin and processed in paraffin wax. Sections were cut at 3 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histopathologic examination.
Eosinophils were counted in five randomly selected high power fields (HPF). Quantification of eosinophils was performed using an Axioskop40 microscope (Mirax-Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 400× magnification. Cell counting was performed by two pathologists who were blinded to the patients' statuses, and the average value over the five HPFs was calculated for each subject.
The histopathologic diagnosis of EoGID was made when the total number of infiltrating eosinophils per HPF exceeded 15 in the esophagus, 20 in the stomach and duodenum, and 25 in the colon and rectum. Terminal ileum and cecum were excluded, considering that tissue eosinophils may be present in normal children.20 (link)21 (link)22 (link)23 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Endoscopic Evaluation of Peptic Ulcers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with mucosal biopsies was performed in all 255 study participants using a GIF-XP260 or GIF-Q260 scope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Diagnosis of peptic ulcers was made based on endoscopic findings, which included the location, size, and number of ulcers and ulcer recurrence.
Colonoscopy with mucosal biopsies was performed additionally in 23 patients, to rule out gastric or duodenal ulcers due to systemic diseases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Esophageal Tumor Implantation in Rabbits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rabbits were first anesthetized after 24 h of fasting with free access to water and then placed in the left lateral decubitus position. An endoscope (Olympus GIFXP260, Japan) was inserted into the thoracic esophagus. Using a fine endoscopic needle (the inner core of an endoscopic needle, Olympus, MAJ-68, 23-gauge), 0.5 ml saline was injected into the submucosal layer to elevate the mucosa layer. Next, a puncture was made using a modified endoscopic needle (Olympus, MAJ-68, with an oblique cut in the front, approximately 20-gauge) across the mucosa into the submucosal layer and the success of the puncture was confirmed by further elevation of the mucosa when saline was injected. About 0.3 ml saline containing 4 tumor pieces was then injected into the submucosal layer of rabbits esophagus (an additional movie file shows this in more detail, see Additional file 1). A second 0.3 ml saline was injected to rinse the needles and to collect the remaining pieces. After implantation, the rabbits were given an auricular vein infusion and fasted for 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Endoscopic Findings in H. pylori-Infected Youth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We reviewed the endoscopic findings of H. pylori‐infected children and young adults in this retrospective study. Subjects were selected from patients who visited the department of gastroenterology or pediatrics at Juntendo University Hospital. Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGI endoscopy) from 1 April 2009 to 15 February 2017, who were under 40 years old, and who were infected with H. pylori were included in this study. Patients were considered to be infected with H. pylori when at least one of the urea breath test with cutoff value of 2.5 per 1000 (Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan), serum H. pylori antibody test with cutoff value of 10 U/mL (E‐plate; Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), and stool H. pylori antigen test (SRL, Tokyo, Japan) was positive. Patients in whom no endoscopic photographs had been taken were excluded. UGI endoscopy was performed using a video endoscopy system (Olympus GIF‐XQ260, GIF‐XP260, Q260, H260Z, or H290, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!