The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using anti cd40 pe

1

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The population of each phenotype of immune cells in different groups was evaluated by using flow cytometric analysis as described previously [30 (link)]. In brief, splenocytes were stained with fluorescent antibodies, including anti-CD4-FITC, anti-CD25-PE, anti-Foxp3-PerCP, anti-CD11c-APC, anti-MHCII-FITC, anti-CD86-PE, anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD4-PE (eBiosciences, San Diego, USA), anti-IL-4-APC, anti-CD68-FITC, and anti-CD206-PE (BioLegend, San Diego, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The FlowJo software was used to analyze the percentages of various phenotypes of immune cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Immune Cell Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant mouse GM-CSF and human TGF-β were purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Flow cytometry (FCM) antibodies (Abs) including anti-mouse (anti-m) CD11b-FITC, anti-mGr1-PE, anti-mLy6C-FITC, anti-mLy6G-PE, anti-mF4/80-PE-Cy5, anti-mCD11c-PE, anti-mCD80-FITC, anti-mCD86-FITC, anti-mI-Ab-FITC, anti-mCD31-PE, anti-CD40-PE, anti-mCD62L-PE, anti-mCD115-PE, anti-mCD124-PE, anti-mCD274-PE, and anti-mFoxp3-PE were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-mIgG1-FITC, anti-mIgG2a-FITC, anti-mIgG2b-FITC, anti-mCD4-PE, anti-mCD8-PE-Cy5, and anti-mCD25-PE-Cy5 were purchased from BD Biosciences Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-mIFN-γ-PE, anti-mTNF-α-PE, anti-miNOS-PE, anti-mArg-1-PE, anti-mTGF-β-PE, and anti-mIL-2-PE were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-milliliter blood samples were taken out the plasma and red blood cells were lysed by NH4Cl lysis solution. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on 106 cells per tube using the following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies:anti-CD3–phycoerythrin (PE)–cyanine (CY) 7,anti-CD40L–PE, anti-CD19–phycoerythrin (PE)–cyanine (CY) 7, anti-CD40–PE, (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD4–fluoresceinisothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CXCR5–allophycocyanin (APC), anti-ICOS–PE, anti-PD1-PE, anti-IL-21R-PE, anti-CD27–fluoresceinisothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CD38–allophycocyanin (APC), anti-ICOSL–PE, anti-PDL1-PE (BD Company, San Jose, CA, USA). Isotype-matched control antibodies (BecktonDickinson, San Jose, USA) were used to correct nonspecific binding.Then the stained cells were analysed using a FACS Canto II cytometer and FACSDiva software (version4.1; Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Analyses of Dendritic Cell Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each assay, cell viability was tested with efluor 506 staining. Expression of activation and maturation markers in DCs was determined by staining with anti-HLA-DR FITC, anti-CD11c efluor 450, anti-CD80 PE-cyanine5, anti-CD86 PE-cyanine7, anti-CD40 PE, and anti-CD83 APC (all from eBioscience). Also, the expression of DC-SIGN and SIGLEC-1 in DCs was determined using anti-CD209 PerCP-cyanine5.5 and anti-CD169 super bright 600 (eBioscience). The frequency of infected CD4+ T cells was evaluated by detecting intracellular p24 (anti-p24 PE, Beckman-coulter, Brea, CA) (S2 Fig). Fluorescence minus one (FMO) or isotype controls were performed for all markers used. The acquisition was performed on an LSR Fortessa (BD) flow cytometer, and analysis was performed using the FlowJo v.7.6 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Immune Cell Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent conjugated rat anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies including anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD80-PE, anti-CD86-PE, anti-MHC-II-PE, and anti-CD11c-FITC were purchased from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA, USA). Three non-infected mice from each group were sacrificed on day 1 and another three on day 3 following intraperitoneal administration, and single-cell suspensions were isolated from their spleens. Stimulated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich) for complete intracellular staining. Cells were then double-stained with antibodies for 30 min at 4°C. The fluorescence intensities were measured with the FACSVerse system and analyzed with FlowJo software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis for the determination of surface antigen expression on DC and T cell were performed using conjugated rat anti-mouse antibodies (mAbs) against the following surface markers: isotype control antibodies (Abs) (IgG1 or IgG2b), anti-CD3-PE, anti-CD4-FITC, anti-CD8-PECy5, anti-CD11c-FITC, anti-MHC I-PE, anti-MHC II-PECy5, anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD86-PECy5, anti-TLR2-PE and anti-TLR4-PEcy5, which were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless stated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunophenotyping of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunophenotyping, activated DCs or tolerogenic DCs were incubated with monoclonal antibody (mAb)- fluorochrome or biotin conjugates: anti-CCR7-PerCP, anti-CD11c-FITC, anti-CD11b-PE, anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD80-PE, anti-CD86-PE, anti-MHC-II-biotin, and anti-PD-L1-biotin (eBioscience Inc.; San Jose, CA) or with the corresponding isotype controls for 20 min at 4°C in the dark and washed twice with saline solution with 1% FBS. PE-avidin was added to the cell suspensions previously incubated with biotin-mAb conjugates, for 20 min at 4°C in the dark, followed by washing once with 1% FBS saline solution. For each sample, data from 100,000 cells was acquired by three-color flow cytometry, using a BD LSRFortessa SORP cytometer and a BD FacsDiva v.6.2 software (Becton Dickinson; Heidelberg, Germany). Cell-free supernatants of mDCs or tDCs were collected 24 h after stimulation and stocked at −20°C until used for cytokine measurements. The concentrations of IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 cytokines were measured by ELISA, using specific antibody kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), according to manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenotypic Analysis of LPS-Stimulated cDCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 10, LPS-stimulated cDCs and unstimulated cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in PBS. An average of 5 × 105 cells per stain was subjected to subsequent analyses. Prior to staining, Fc receptors on cDCs were blocked by preincubation with anti-CD16/CD32 antibodies (Biolegend) for 5-10 min on ice. Surface staining was performed by incubating the cells with fluorochrome-conjugated specific antibodies, or the corresponding isotype controls, for at least 20 min in dark on ice. The following antibodies and isotype controls (unless stated otherwise, all purchased from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) were employed: anti-CD11c-FITC/-APC (#130-102-466/-493), anti-MHC-II-APC (#130-102-139), anti-CD40-PE (#130-102-599), anti-CD80-PE (#130-102-613), anti-CD83-PE (#130-104-474), anti-CD86-APC (#130-102-558), anti-hamster IgG-FITC/-PE/-APC (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-rat IgG2a-PE (eBiosciences), anti-rat IgG2b-APC (Immunotools), and REA Control. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). A total of 20,000 events per sample were acquired, and data were evaluated using the CellQuestPro software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Activated cDCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 10, LPS-stimulated cDCs and unstimulated cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in PBS. An average of 5 x 10 5 cells per stain was subjected to subsequent analyses. Prior to staining, Fc receptors on cDCs were blocked by preincubation with anti-CD16/ CD32 antibodies (Biolegend) for 5-10 min on ice. Surface staining was performed by incubating the cells with fluorochrome-conjugated specific antibodies, or the corresponding isotype controls, for at least 20 min in dark on ice. The following antibodies and isotype controls (unless stated otherwise, all purchased from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) were employed: anti-CD11c-FITC/-APC (#130-102-466/-493), anti-MHC-II-APC (#130-102-139), anti-CD40-PE (#130-102-599), anti-CD80-PE (#130-102-613), anti-CD83-PE (#130-104-474), anti-CD86-APC (#130-102-558), anti-hamster IgG-FITC/-PE/-APC (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-rat IgG2a-PE (eBiosciences), anti-rat IgG2b-APC (Immunotools), and REA Control. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). A total of 20,000 events per sample were acquired, and data were evaluated using the CellQuestPro software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Maturation and Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For measuring maturation of BMDCs, we stained the BMDCs with anti-CD11c-PerCP/Cy5, anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD80-PE, anti-CD86PE and anti-MHCII-PE (eBioscience, California, USA) and analyzed these by flow cytometer. For measuring differentiation of Tregs and Th17 cells, the flow cytometer was utilized. Tregs were analyzed by flow cytometry using FITClabeled antibodies against CD4, APC-labeled antibodies against CD25 and PE-labeled antibodies against Foxp3 (Biolegend, San Diego, USA). Th17 cells were stained with anti-CD4 APC, anti-CD3 Alexa Fluor 488-A and anti-IL17 PE (Biolegend, San Diego, USA). Staining was performed in PBS supplemented with 0.1% BSA and 0.02% sodium azide for 30 min at 4°C.
Intracellular and nuclear transcription factor staining was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Biolegend, San Diego, USA). The cells were examined on the FACS Canto flow cytometer and analyzed by Flow Jo v10.0.7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!