The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mobio powerlyzer power soil dna isolation kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in United States

The MoBio PowerLyzer® Power Soil® DNA Isolation Kit is a laboratory equipment product designed for the extraction and purification of DNA from soil and environmental samples. The kit utilizes a bead-beating method to efficiently lyse cells and release DNA, which is then purified through a series of steps.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using mobio powerlyzer power soil dna isolation kit

1

Colon Mucosal DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total community DNA was extracted from mucosal scrape samples collected from colon during dissection as well as from feed samples using the MoBio PowerLyzer® Power Soil® DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations with minor modifications as previously reported (Bahl, Bergström, & Licht, 2012). DNA concentrations were measured with the Qubit dsDNA HS kit (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Extraction from Microbial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain genomic DNA from microbial isolates, single colonies were picked from HB plates, and grown in 5 ml HB medium supplemented with 2 M or 4.3 M NaCl at 42°C with continuous shaking at 200 RPM in an Innova 44R shaker (New Brunswick, Connecticut, USA). Cells were harvested and DNA extracted as described previously [45 ]. Genomic DNA from soil and salt samples was extracted using the MO BIO PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA isolation kit per manufacturer’s recommendation (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fecal Microbiome DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from fecal samples using the Mobio PowerLyzer™ PowerSoil® DNA isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories) with slight modifications as follows. Fecal slurries (1:1 feces/water) were thawed and centrifuged at 13,000 RPM for 10 minutes and the supernatant was removed. Approximately 200 mg (±10 mg) was transferred to the bead-beating tube, bead solution added and then heat treated at 65°C for 10 minutes and then 95°C for 10 minutes. Additional heat treatment was also applied to samples undergoing the HMP procedure with the MoBIO DNA extraction kit. Bead-beating of the samples was performed at 30 cycles/s for 5 minutes, followed by 10 minutes rest, and bead-beating again for 5 minutes (Retsch MM 300 mixer mill); the beads in the kit were the same size as those used in for MetaHIT method. The remaining DNA extraction procedure followed the standard protocol supplied by the company and final elution of DNA was performed with 100 μl Tris (MoBIO buffer C6). DNA concentrations and purity were determined as stated above, and samples were stored at -20°C until sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Quantification of Environmental DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed using MoBio Powerlyzer Powersoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, USA). Samples that were immersed in solution were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min and the supernatant discarded. Samples were washed with 1 mL of cold 1× PBS (pH7.2) (Life Technologies, Melbourne, Australia) and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 mins. DNA extraction was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following modifications. Samples were placed into bead tubes with solution C1 and heated at 65 °C for 10 min, prior to two cycles of bead beating at 6.5 m/s for 1 min using a FastPrep-24 bead beater (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, USA). Total DNA was eluted in 100 μL of sterile water. DNA concentration was quantified fluorometrically with a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wetland Sediment Metagenomic Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sediment core samples were collected from two adjacent wetlands, P7 and P8, at the United States Geological Survey-managed Cottonwood Lake Study Area near Jamestown, ND, USA [9 (link)]. From 16S rRNA gene analyses, 18 representative sediment samples were selected for metagenomic sequencing based on wetland (P7 and P8), season (winter, spring, summer), and depth (1–3, 10–12, and 19–21 cm) (Additional file 1: Table S1). After being stored at − 80 °C, sediments were thawed, and DNA was extracted using the MoBio PowerLyzer Powersoil® DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following extraction, nucleic acids were quantified (Additional file 1: Table S1) using a Qubit® Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and diluted, so ~ 200 ng of DNA per sample was sent for metagenomic sequencing at the DOE Joint Genome Institute. These samples had been previously analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and pore water measurements of sulfate, sulfide, ferrous iron, methane, methanol, trimethylamine, ethanol, 2-propanol, acetate, acetone, and formate [9 (link)]. Here, these geochemical measurements were used as input values for principal component analysis in R [16 ] in order to illustrate the geochemical differences between P7 and P8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fecal DNA Extraction for Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Known masses of mouse feces were immersed in 1 ml of cold (4°C) 1× sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom) and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 min to form a pellet for DNA extraction. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh microcentrifuge tube for metabolomics study. DNA extraction was performed using a Mo Bio PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as previously described (62 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fungal DNA Extraction and Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted microbial DNA from 0.25 g of soil (±0.025 g) using a MO BIO Powerlyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), and quantified the extracted DNA using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). We used modified versions of the universal fungal primers ITS1F and ITS2 described in Smith and Peay (2014) improved as part of the Earth Microbiome Project (Walters et al. 2015 ). While currently considered the most accurate for species identification of fungi, these primers do have certain limitations, particularly low resolution for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) (Schoch et al. 2012 , Öpik et al. 2014 ) and poor mapping to phylogeny (Yarza et al. 2017 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Faecal and Intestinal Microbiome DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Community DNA was extracted from faecal samples collected on the initial day of dosing (Day 0), and the day before the euthanization of the first animals (Day 9), as well as from ileal and caecal content using the MoBio PowerLyzer® Power Soil® DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations with minor modifications: A maximum of 200 mg samples was used for extraction and samples were heated to 65°C for 10 min after addition of the C1 solution. Bead beating was conducted at 30 cycles/s for 4 min (Retsch MM 300 mixer mill). DNA concentrations were measured with the Qubit dsDNA HS kit (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metagenomic Profiling of Gut Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All laboratory protocols were performed at the Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics at the AMNH. We performed DNA isolations and library preparations in a UV-sterilized laminar flow hood to minimize aerosol contamination. Intestinal tissue was scraped using sterilized razor blades. Guano and intestinal scrapings were placed in bead tubes and mechanically disrupted with a Disruptor Genie (Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY) for 45 s−1 min. We extracted microbial DNA from guano and intestinal mucosa samples using the MO BIO PowerLyzer™ PowerSoil® DNA Isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA), using 0.25 mg of sample and following the manufacturer's instructions with the following amendment: samples were incubated at room temperature for two min on the extraction column membrane prior to final elution (QIAGEN, pers. comm.). Samples with high organic content were further purified using the PowerClean® Pro DNA Clean-Up Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). Each extracted DNA sample was quantified using a Qubit™ 2.0 Fluorometer and High Sensitivity dsDNA reagent kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). A total of 55 DNA samples, 29 intestinal and 24 guano, were used for metagenomic library preparation, including extraction and PCR negative controls to account for contamination at each step in the library preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Gut Microbiome Changes in Weight Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool samples will be collected at pre-baseline and 2 weeks before the end of the weight loss and weight maintenance phases using OMNIgene GUT DNA Stabilization Kits (DNA Genotek). DNA extraction will be performed using MoBio Powerlyzer Powersoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, California, USA) as described previously.96 (link) DNA concentration will be quantified fluorometrically with a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit (Life Technologies). Faecal microbial composition will be assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.97 (link) This analysis will include determination of Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratios and quantification of Akkermansia muciniphila abundance. A subsample of highest responders (n=10) and lowest responders (n=10) (based on weight regain) will also undergo more detailed analysis of samples from pre-baseline, end of weight loss and end of weight maintenance. Samples will be assessed for identification of responder/non-responder phylogenetic and functional traits using shotgun metagenomic sequencing.98 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!