The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Precr repair mix

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United States

PreCR Repair Mix is a laboratory reagent designed to repair damaged or fragmented DNA samples. It functions by enzymatically restoring the integrity of DNA molecules, facilitating downstream applications such as PCR amplification and library preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using precr repair mix

1

Genome Capture and Sequencing of Spiders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each species, two target capture genomic libraries were constructed, for a total of twelve libraries. Each library represented the genome of an individual spider. The biological replicates were done to facilitate distinguishing allelic variation from multi-copy genes. Prior to library construction, 5 μg of DNA was sheared into ~500 bp fragments with an S220 focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA). The fragmented DNA was treated with PreCR Repair Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and then purified with Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Library construction and target selection were performed with the SureSelectXT Reagent Kit (Agilent), using the target capture probes described above. The libraries were sequenced bidirectionally (2 × 300bp) in multiplexed sets of four on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at the University of California, Riverside Genomics Core Facility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptome Analysis of Rat Nucleus Accumbens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each group, accumbal tissue from 6 animals was pooled for sample preparation. Total RNA was extracted using the Qiagen midi RNeasy kit (Valencia, CA, USA). Ribosomal RNA was depleted using the Ribo-Zero kit according to manufacturer’s protocols (epicenter). Double stranded cDNA was synthesized with the superscript dscDNA kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). In between the first and second strand synthesis, the PreCR repair Mix was utilized to fill in nicks in the DNA (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). The samples were then checked for integrity using the bioanalyzer (Agilinent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Samples were run through the Pacific Bio Sequencer at the University of Massachusetts School of Medicine Core Facility (Pacific Biosciences RSII Instrument; P4/C2 version run chemistry with 120-minute data collection times and smrtportal data analysis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nucleosome Preparation and Chromatin Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse 3134 cells were cultured, treated with vehicle or 100 nM dexamethasone for 1 h prior to harvest, and nuclei were prepared as described (23 (link)), except for the following modifications. Prior to MNase digestion, nuclei were washed in Nuclei Suspension Buffer (25% glycerol, 5 mM Mg-acetate, 5 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 0.08 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM spermidine, 1 mM DTT) and resuspended in MNase Digestion Buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM spermidine) at 75 million nuclei/ml and 400 U/ml MNase (Worthington). Nuclei were digested in 400 ul aliquots for 4–7 min at 37°C with gentle agitation; the reaction was terminated with Stop Buffer (500 mM NaCl (140 mM final), 50 mM EDTA (14 mM final), 20 mM EGTA (5.6 mM final), 3.6% SDS (1% final)) to yield ∼90% mono-nucleosomes (Supplementary Figure S1). The digests were treated with RNase (Life Technologies) for 30 min, then proteinase K (Ambion) for another 30 min. Samples were extracted twice with phenol/chloroform and ethanol-precipitated. DNA pellets were washed twice with 70% ethanol, dried and dissolved in water. Nicks in MNase-digested DNA were repaired using the PreCR repair mix (NEB) and the DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex-PCR for DNA Repair Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from nuclei preparations was prepared using the PureLink™ DNA Mini Kit (LifeTechnologies). Fifty nanograms of DNA were subjected to template restoration using PreCR Repair Mix (NEB) in a reaction containing 1× ThermoPol Buffer, 100 μM dNTPs, 1× NAD+, 1 μl of PreCR mix and H2O to 50 μl, incubated 20 min at 37°C. The restored DNA was concentrated using the DNA Clean & Concentrator (Zymo Research) and identical amounts of repaired and unrepaired bulk DNA were subjected to Multiplex-PCR as previously described23 (link) with minor modifications. The PCR reaction was performed with four primer sets that produce 100, 200, 300 and 400 bp fragments from non-overlapping target sites in the GAPDH gene (chr12) in 25 μl with final concentrations of 0.133 μM of each of the eight primers (Supplementary Table 3) and 1× AmpliTaq® Gold 360 DNA Master Mix. Multiplex-PCR was conducted as follows: 5 min 95°C, 37 cycles each of 15 sec 95°C, 15 sec 55°C and 30 sec 72°C, followed by 5 min 72°. Fifteen microliters of PCR product was loaded on a 2% TAE agarose gel and electrophoresed. Samples (unrepaired) were classified based on the largest of four possible PCR products detected. Unrepaired and repaired DNA samples were run side-by-side for comparison purposes (Supplementary Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Repair and Sequencing of Ancient Permafrost DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Given the anticipated DNA damage in the ancient permafrost samples, both iDNA and eDNA fractions were subject to DNA repair with PreCR™ Repair Mix (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) prior to sequencing. The PreCR™ Repair Mix is an enzyme cocktail (containing Taq DNA Ligase, Endonuclease IV, Bst DNA Polymerase, Fpg, Uracil-DNA Glycosylase, T4 Endonuclease V, and Endonuclease VIII) that can repair a wide range of DNA damages such as deaminated cytosine, apurinic/apyrimidinic sites, thymine dimers, nicks, and gaps. Up to 50 ng of DNA was treated with PreCR™ Repair Mix at 37 °C for 20 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The original untreated DNA, as well as the PreCR repaired DNA, were then converted to Illumina sequencing libraries using the Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep kit (Illumina, CA) with a unique DNA barcode added to each library. The libraries were examined on Bioanalyzer DNA High Sensitivity chips (Agilent, CA) for size distribution, and quantified by Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, CA). Each set of libraries were pooled at equal molar amount and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2500 Rapid flow cell as 2 × 150 nt paired-end reads. In total, 12 metagenomic libraries from the iDNA and eDNA fractions with and without DNA repair were sequenced. The pass-filter reads were retained and demultiplexed using fastq-multx for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Nicking and RADD-seq Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from human keratinocyte cells was extracted using the GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was nicked using the Nt.BspQI enzyme (10,000 U/mL; NEB). 10 μg of DNA were mixed with 11.6 μL Nt.BspQI enzyme, 10 μL NEBuffer 3.1 (NEB), and ultrapure water to a final volume of 70 μL. The reaction mixture was incubated for 2 h at 50°C. After the nicking reaction, DNA samples were labeled with 10 μL of a cocktail of repair enzymes (PreCR Repair Mix; NEB), fragmented, and assayed according to RADD-seq procedure as described above, with biotinylated nucleotides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sensitive Mutation Detection in FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Archival formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks were evaluated for sample quality prior to sectioning five slides for DNA extraction. Areas of highest tumor content were selected and micro-dissected. DNA was extracted using QIAMP DNA FFPE tissue kits with barcoding to maintain sample continuity.
Prior to sequencing, samples underwent a repair step using the New England Biolabs PreCR repair mix. DNA isolated from FFPE was subjected to LINE-1 qPCR for quantification and quality control.20 (link) Only PCR-accessible, inhibition-free and amplifiable target regions qualified for subsequent analysis. For any sample with amplicons exhibiting insufficient amplification, PCR products underwent additional analysis on an agarose gel to confirm successful and target-specific amplification before BEAMing analysis was performed. 2/242 samples had one or more amplicons in RAS that was not analyzable due to unamplifiable DNA. These samples were still analyzed for BRAF mutations.
A previously described highly sensitive beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics (BEAMing) analysis was utilized to detect mutations in KRAS/NRAS (codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, & 146) and BRAF V600E with coverage outlined in Supplemental table 1 and a 1% MAF limit of detection. Sequencing was carried out by Sysmex Inostics (Baltimore, MD).15 (link),18 (link),21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

FFPE DNA Quality Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We selected the FFPE specimens by applying a multiplex PCR assay59 (link),60 (link) to define the quality of the DNA extracted from the FFPE samples. This assay uses primer sets that amplify four genomic fragments (100, 200, 300, and 400 bp); the names and sequences of the primers are provided in Supplementary Table 3. Before the multiplex PCR assay, the DNA sample was heated at 90 °C for 60 min to facilitate the removal of the crosslinks of the FFPE tissues, and FFPE DNA repair was performed by adding 1× ThermoPol Buffer, 50x dNTPs/NAD + mixture, and PreCR Repair Mix (NEB) for 30 min at 37 °C57 (link). The samples producing 300- and 400-bp fragments were deemed to be good quality and were selected for this study. Ultimately, 29 cases of FFPE IMPC passed the quality control test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Quality Nextera Mate Pair Library Prep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA (15 µg) was treated with 5 ul of PreCR Repair Mix (New England Biolabs) in a 450 ul reaction in 1X ThermoPol buffer containing 0.1 mM (each) final concentration of dNTPs and 0.5mM final concentration of NAD+. DNA was then purified by one extraction with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and one extraction with chloroform followed by ethanol precipitation. 4 µg of PreCR-repaired DNA was used as input for the Nextera Mate Pair Sample Preparation kit (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s “gel plus” protocol. Size selection was performed with a BioRad FIGE Mapper using a buffer re-circulating pump and the following conditions: 1X TAE buffer; 16 hr run at room temperature; 4.1 V/cm forward and 2.7 V/cm reverse field strength, both with linear ramping from 0.1 sec initial to 0.8 sec final switch time. Gel slices were cut from the gel adjacent to ladder bands at ∼3kb, ∼6 kb and ∼10 kb. Circular ligation products were fragmented by sonication in a Diagenode Bioruptor NGS instrument (high power setting, 5 cycles of 15 sec on, 90 sec off). Fifteen cycles of enrichment amplification were performed.
Completed libraries were pooled as necessary and sequenced in paired-end Rapid Run mode on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Read lengths were 151 bp forward read and 151 bp reverse read. Sequencing results for each library are given in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Gap Repair Using Drop Dialysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For gap repair of DNA, drop dialysis was performed on nitrocellulose filters (Millipore, 0.025 μm) for 15 min at room temperature against 200 ml distilled water. This was incubated with the PreCR Repair Mix from New England Biolabs (catalog number M0309) at 37 °C for 20 min. Transformation of T. thermophilus HB27 with chromosomal DNA was then performed as described (Koyama 1986 (link)) using 1.5 ml culture, allowing 3 hrs of outgrowth after addition of DNA, and plating all cells on selective media. Standard molecular biology techniques and reagents were employed for additional procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!