The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 well biocoat matrigel invasion chambers

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States

The 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers are a laboratory equipment designed to assess the invasive potential of cells. The product consists of cell culture inserts with a Matrigel-coated membrane, allowing for the study of cell migration and invasion through a reconstituted basement membrane.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using 24 well biocoat matrigel invasion chambers

1

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well millicell hanging insert (Millipore) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 1 × 105 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 or 48-h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell ability of migration and invasion were performed using 24-well migration chamber (Corning, NY) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences, CA) with polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-based membrane of 8.0-um pore size. In Brief, 1x105 cells were suspended with serum-free culture medium and seeded in the top chambers. Complete culture medium with 10% FBS was used in the bottom chambers. The chambers were collected after 24/48 hours’ incubation. Cells which moved through the membrane were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution. The number of cells invaded through the membrane per field were counted and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon) under microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well millicell hanging insert (Millipore) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 1×105 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 h or 48 h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was assessed by wound-healing and Transwell assays. For the wound-healing assay, a scratch was made in the center of the culture dish using a sterile 20-µL pipette tip before cells were fully confluent. The wound was observed using a bright-field microscope at 24- and 48-h after scratching. The migration rate = (scratch widths before migration – scratch widths after migration)/scratch widths before migration ×100%. Transwell migration assay was conducted using 24-well Transwell Chambers without Matrigel (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1×105 Huh7 cells or 1×105 CLC13 cells in medium with 10% FBS were added to the top chamber, and the medium containing 20% FBS was added to the bottom chamber as an attractant. After 48-h incubation, the migrated cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet. The number of migrated cells was counted in 10 fields under a 10× objective lens.
Transwell invasion assay was conducted using 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 4×105 Huh7 cells in medium with 10% FBS were added to the top chamber, and the medium containing 20% FBS was added to the bottom chamber as an attractant. The remaining steps are the same as those described for the Transwell migration assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well milli-cell hanging insert (BD Biosciences) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 5 × 104 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 or 48 h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Cancer Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used 24‐well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences, Franklin, New Jersey, USA) to evaluate migratory and invasive abilities of GC cells. 3 × 104/well cells were suspended in 200 μL serum‐free medium and were seeded into the upper chamber containing an uncoated or matrigel‐coated membrane, and then complete medium (700 μL) was added into lower chamber. 0.1% crystal violet was used to stain the cells that invaded or migrated to the low membrane after 24‐hour incubation at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. The experiments were performed in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Invasion Assay of Hep3B Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion ability of Hep3B cells was assessed in 24‐well Biocoat Matrigel invasion chambers with an 8‐µm pore size (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Briefly, 48 hours following transfection with MYCN siRNAs or miR‐493‐5p mimics and MYCN expression vector, 50 000 cells were plated in the upper chamber with serum‐free medium. The bottom chamber contained 20% FBS as a chemoattractant. After incubation for 72 hours, cells that did not migrate through the membrane were removed using a cotton swab. Invasive cells on the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol and stained using a Diff‐Quik staining kit (Sysmex). Cells were automatically counted using a BZ‐X700 microscope system (Keyence), and the average number of cells per field was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well milli-cell hanging insert (BD Biosciences) or 24well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 5×10 4 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 or 48h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Matrigel Invasion Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion assay was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD BioCoat 24-well Matrigel invasion chambers). Invasion of treated cells was expressed as a percentage relative to the control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GTP Rescue of Matrigel Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion assay was carried our according to manufacturer’s instructions (BD BioCoat 24 well matrigel invasion chambers). GTP (1mM, Sigma) was added both in upper and lower chambers for invasion rescue. Invasion of mtp53 knockdown cells was expressed as a percentage relative to control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!