The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

M 1 c evaluator

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

The M.I.C.Evaluator is a laboratory instrument designed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial agents against various microorganisms. It provides a standardized and automated method for evaluating the susceptibility of bacteria and other microbes to different antibiotics or antimicrobial compounds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using m 1 c evaluator

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
M.I.C.Evaluator (Oxoid), ETEST® (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), or MIC (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) gradient strips were used to evaluate susceptibility. The following panel of 18 antibiotics spanning 13 classes were used: ampicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (penicillins); cefotaxime and cefepime (cephalosporins); ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolones); amikacin, gentamicin, and streptomycin (aminoglycosides); trimethoprim (trimethoprims); trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfonamides); bacitracin (bacitracins); erythromycin (macrolides); tetracycline (tetracyclines); nitrofurantoin (nitrofurans); fosfomycin (fosfomycins); and imipenem and meropenem (carbapenems). Susceptibility profiles to colistin (polymyxins) was determined through the broth micro-dilution method using ComASPTM Colistin (Liofilchem). All testing was performed in accordance to the manufacturer’s instructions. MIC clinical breakpoints from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) were used to determine susceptibility (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2019 ). Multidrug resistance was defined as phenotypic resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Campylobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the E-test according to the protocol of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for fastidious organisms. C. jejuni ATCC 33560 was used for quality control. All Campylobacter isolates were suspended into Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth to a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Mueller–Hinton agar plates supplemented with 5% of defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid) and 20 mg/L β-NAD (Sigma Aldrich) were inoculated with the suspension prepared. The following M.I.C.Evaluator (Oxoid) strips were placed on the surface of dry plates: erythromycin (E, 0.015–256 μg/ml), gentamicin (CN, 0.015–256 μg/ml), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 0.002–32 μg/ml), amoxicillin (AML, 0.015–256 μg/ml), tetracycline (TET, 0.015–256 μg/ml), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC, 0.015–256 μg/ml), ceftriaxone (CRO, 0.002–32 μg/ml), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 0.002–32 μg/ml). The plates were incubated at 41 ± 1°C for 24–48 h at microaerophilic atmosphere. Zones of inhibited growth for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline were determined according to EUCAST breakpoints for Campylobacter3. Since the MIC breakpoints for the remaining tested antimicrobials were not specified for Campylobacter by EUCAST, we used the breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples obtained were cultured on bloody agar and EMB agar, and conventional methods plus a VITEK-2 Compact Automated System (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) were used for bacterial identification and antibiograms. The antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated strains was determined by the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method (CLSI 2010) [18 ]. Ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 μg), piperaciline-tazobactam 100/10 μg, cefepime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), tobramicin (10 μg), netilmicin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25 μg/23 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (10 μg), and tigecycline (15 μg) antibiotic disks (Oxoid, UK) were used. P.aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was studied as the quality control strain. For colistin, the interpretive criteria of Galani et al. [19 (link)], and for tigecycline, the interpretive criteria of Jones et al. [20 (link)], were applied. The imipenem-resistant strains were detected by the disk diffusion method and confirmed by the imipenem E-test (Oxoid M.I.C Evaluator, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cefoxitin disk diffusion susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (64 ). MIC measurements by broth microdilution or agar dilution were performed in accordance with CLSI methods for dilution susceptibility testing of staphylococci (65 ). Disk diffusion and MIC results were interpreted using CLSI standard M100, and strains were classified as susceptible or resistant (66 ). For oxacillin MIC measurement, M.I.C.Evaluator (Oxoid) strips were used in accordance with manufacturer guidelines. Strains were grown at 37°C on MHA for 24 h, 5 to 6 colonies were resuspended in 0.85% saline and adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard. The suspension was swabbed evenly three times across the surface of an MHA 2% NaCl plate (4-mm agar depth). An M.I.C.Evaluator strip was applied, followed by incubation for 24 h at 35°C. Three independent measurements were performed for each strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of isolates to a panel of 7 antimicrobials was performed using gradient M.I.C.Evaluator (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and Etest strips (Biomerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). The panel included: chloramphenicol, metronidazole, penicillin G, rifampicin, and tetracycline (0.002-32 mg/L); clindamycin (0.016-256 mg/L); and erythromycin(0.015-256 mg/L).
Screening was performed as per manufacturers instruction. Breakpoints were taken from: EUCAST recommendations for C. perfringens for clindamycin, metronidazole, and penicillin (The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2022); CLSI for chloramphenicol and tetracycline (CLSI, 2014) ; with those of both erythromycin and rifampicin taken from Álvarez-Pérez et al. (2016) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility of 12 antibiotics was tested using standard disk diffusion method as previously described (Andrews and Howe, 2011 (link)). This included amoxicillin (10 μg); cefepime (30 μg); chloramphenicol (30 μg); erythromycin (5 μg); fusidic acid (10 μg); gentamicin (10 μg); mupirocin (20 μg); oxacillin (1 μg); penicillin (1 unit); streptomycin (10 μg); tetracycline (10 μg); vancomycin (5 μg). The categories susceptible, intermediate resistant or resistant were assigned on the basis of the Guidelines for Susceptibility Testing (Andrews and Howe, 2011 (link)). The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for oxacillin were additionally evaluated using “M.I.C. evaluators” (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of S. epidermidis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of S. epidermidis G6_2 was tested against 13 antibiotics (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK) using disk diffusion methods according to BSAC guidelines (J. M. Andrews and Howe 2011 (link)). This included penicillin (1 unit), amoxicillin (10 µg), cefoxitin (10 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), cefepime (30 µg), vancomycin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), mupirocin (20 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), tetracycline (10 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg) and chloramphenicol (30 µg). In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the isolate to oxacillin was determined using ‘‘M.I.C. evaluators’’ (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A panel of 11 antibiotics was used to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of all the isolates. The standard disk diffusion method was used to test AM: amoxicillin (10 μg); CEP: cefepime (30 μg); CHL: chloramphenicol (30 μg); ERY: erythromycin (5 μg); FC: fusidic acid (10 μg); GEN: gentamicin (10 μg); MUP: mupirocin (20 μg); OX: oxacillin (1 μg); PEN: penicillin (1 unit); STR: streptomycin (10 μg); TET: tetracycline (10 μg);. The susceptible, intermediate resistant or resistant were determined by the Guidelines for Susceptibility Testing [14 (link)]. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for oxacillin were additionally evaluated using “M.I.C. evaluators” (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Microbial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were screened for resistance to antibiotics by agar disk diffusion on Iso Sensitest media (Iso Sensitest Agar, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). Zones of inhibition were evaluated against twelve antibiotic (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The following antibiotic discs were used: chloramphenicol (30 g), erythromycin (15 g), fusidic acid (10 g), oxacillin (1 g), penicillin G (1 unit), streptomycin (10 g), tetracycline (10 g), cefoxitin (30 g), gentamicin (10 g), vancomycin (5 g), cefepime (30 g), and mupirocin (20 g). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to oxacillin were additionally evaluated using "MIC evaluators", antimicrobial gradient strips designed for accurate minimum inhibitory concentration values (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). The categories susceptible, intermediate resistant or resistant were assigned on the basis of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) antimicrobial susceptibility testing standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!