The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbscan 2

Manufactured by Bausch & Lomb
Sourced in United States, Germany, Switzerland

The Orbscan II is a diagnostic device designed to measure the topography of the cornea. It uses a slit-scanning technique to capture detailed images of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea, providing precise measurements and analysis of the corneal structure.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

44 protocols using orbscan 2

1

Corneal Topography and Keratoconus Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corneal topography was obtained using the Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb) or Pentacam (Oculus Surgical, Inc.) for all study subjects. The steep keratometry (K) reading of the simulated K reading was recorded. The topography-based keratoconus percentage index (KISA%)12 (link) was calculated for subjects recruited at the OHSU site.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Corneal Tomography and Astigmatism Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY, version 3.2) is a Placido disc, scanning slit, servo-controlled system for the assessment of corneal tomography. In addition, the device captures the locations of the pupil center and the first Purkinje image. From this information, the software provides the distance separating these two landmarks along horizontal (I) and vertical (II) axes, the angular direction of the first Purkinje image from the pupil center (B) and K. Starting at the 3 o’clock position (0°) and travelling anticlockwise, B is the meridian connecting the pupil center with the first Purkinje image. A serviced and calibrated single Orbscan II model was used throughout the course of the study as described in the user’s handbook. The refractive astigmatism was determined using a single calibrated autorefractometer (Tomey RT-7000, Tomey Corp, Tokyo, Japan) followed by routine subjective refraction. All cases were checked at 1, 2, and 3 months postop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ocular Surface Evaluation in Istanbul

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this cross-sectional observational study, the subjects were recruited from a population of individuals seeking routine eye examination at the ophthalmology outpatient clinic of the Altintepe Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey, between November 2012 and June 2013.
Exclusion criteria included history of ocular surface or intraocular surgery and the use of topical and systemic medications that could potentially disrupt the ocular surface health, contact lens use, suspicion of keratectasia, ongoing anterior segment pathology, ocular disease having the potential to alter the optical property or preclude proper viewing of the fixation target of the measuring devices, and a best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40. Before inclusion in the study, all subjects underwent a complete ocular examination that included assessment of the manifest refraction, corneal topography, biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Topography and keratometry were assessed using Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb, Salt Lake City, Utah).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ocular Biometry Measurements and Instrumentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), aqueous depth (AD, the distance between the posterior corneal surface and anterior lens vertex), anterior chamber depth (ACD, the distance between anterior corneal vertex and anterior lens vertex), and lens thickness (LT) were measured.
Average corneal curvature (Kmed) and corneal astigmatism (difference between maximal and minimal corneal curvature) were assessed using keratometry. Instruments used for biometry were the IOL Master™ (software version V.3.01, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany), the LENSTAR LS 900® (Haag-Streit Holding AG, Könitz, Switzerland), the ORBSCAN II® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) and the GALILEI™ V5.2.1 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Patients Undergoing Phototherapeutic Keratectomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Characterizations of patients, including age, gender, cause, and associated conditions, were collected. The interval from the onset to the start of medical treatment and the interval from onset of therapy to PTK were also recorded. Preoperatively, all patients underwent a slit lamp examination, spherical equivalent measurement, keratometry, corneal topography (Orbscan II, Bausch & Lomb Inc., Rochester, NY, USA), uncorrected visual acuity exam, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) determination when possible, intraocular pressure measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry, or noncontact tonometry (not possible to perform in all cases). Ultrasound pachymetry (pachymeter SP-3000, Tomey Laboratories, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, USA) was performed on all eyes preoperatively to assess suitability for PTK.
On the day of surgery, digital slit lamp photography was performed to determine the lesion size. Central corneal thickness (CCT), central lesion thickness, and peripheral lesion thickness measurements were taken. Accordingly, the thickness of corresponding areas on the nonaffected eye was also determined. The preoperative BCVA was the last recorded value before the excimer laser procedure was performed. The spherical equivalent and BCVA of the healthy eyes were also measured and recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Corneal Topography and Astigmatism Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) provides axial dioptric power maps of both corneal surfaces over the central optical zone diameters of 3 mm and 5 mm and the average pupil diameter under the prevailing conditions. This device is a placido disc scanning slit-lamp system designed to retrieve data from 9000 locations over the cornea [26 (link)]. The scanning slit provides the numerical separation between the two corneal surfaces at each location. These data, in conjunction with the dioptric power maps generated for the front surface, are used to construct an axial dioptric power map of the back surface. The algorithm used is an extension of earlier methods [13 , 25 (link)]. Calculation of corneal back surface powers is based on refractive index values of 1.376 for the cornea and 1.336 for the aqueous humour. The data from the multiple power maps are averaged to provide astigmatic power, and axis, values over two corneal chord diameters (3 mm and 5 mm). Full descriptions and functionality of Orbscan II are provided elsewhere [26 (link), 27 (link)]. This is a long-standing instrument proven to be useful for examining the corneal surfaces in a wide range of studies [11 (link), 28 (link)–33 (link)]. Refractive astigmatism was determined by autorefractometry and by routine subjective refraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Corneal Topography Using Orbscan II

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Orbscan II device (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) was the scanning-slit tomography device used in our study, and uses both scanning-slit and Placido-disc technology to combine keratometry measurements with assessment of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces which allows a three-dimensional reconstruction of the cornea.47 (link) The device projects 40 slits, 20 from each side, onto the cornea and records the backscattered light. The Orbscan II software does not provide a quality score; instead, it automatically assesses and discards measurements deemed to be of unacceptable quality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Corneal Topography and Pachymetry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anterior corneal topography was obtained and exported from the Orbscan II device (Bausch & Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ, USA). This system projects 40 optical slits, 20 from the right and 20 from the left, onto the cornea at a 45-degree angle. The resulting slit images were captured by a digital video camera and used to reconstruct the topography of corneal surface. The topography maps were repositioned to be centered on the pupil center. The KISA% index was calculated based on the Placido-based axial power maps from the Orbscan II. A Fourier-domain OCT system (RTVue, Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA) was used to acquire corneal pachymetry and epithelial thickness maps. The system works at an 830-nm wavelength and has a scanning speed of 26,000 axial scans per second. The depth resolution of RTVue is 5 μm (full-width-half-maximum) in tissue. The OCT scan pattern for mapping the cornea was “Pachymetry+CPwr,” which consisted of eight evenly spaced radial scans 6 mm in length. The pachymetry and epithelial thickness maps were also centered on the pupil center.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LASIK Preoperative Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients signed an informed consent for LASIK surgery. The Ethics Committee of Instituto de Oftalmologia “Conde de Valenciana” approved this study. All patients had stable refraction for at least 6 months before surgery, a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 or better, and over 21 years of age. Patients were excluded if there was an abnormal ocular examination, topographic evidence of keratoconus, or warpage from contact lenses and pregnancy. Preoperative evaluation included a comprehensive ophthalmic examination: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest and cycloplegic refractions, applanation tonometry, and computerized corneal tomography using Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and/or Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb, New York, USA). We obtained keratometry and pachymetry data from Pentacam tomography and white-to-white distance data from Orbscan tomography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Pre- and Post-Operative Ophthalmic Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to the operation, we performed slit-lamp biomicroscopy and dilated eye fundus examinations, and measured the patients’ uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), BCVA, manifest spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) and intraocular pressure (IOP) (using a Goldmann tonometer). We also measured their white-to-white (WTW) distances and anterior chamber depths (ACD) from the endothelium, the latter with an Orbscan II topography (Bausch & Lomb, Orbtek Inc., USA). In follow-up, we measured the UCVA, BCVA, SE, IOP and carried out a slit lamp examination at 1 day and 1 month postoperative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!