The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

186 protocols using h3k4me3

1

ChIP-seq on Adult Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used two ovaries from different animals for each biological replicate; we used two replicates for control and treated groups. Chromatin immunoprecipitation in adult tissue was performed as previously described [2 (link)], except for small modifications. Specifically, chromatin was not dialyzed after sonication but instead diluted 6 times with ChIP-dilution buffer. We performed ChIP using 1 µg of H3K4me3 (Merck Millipore, 07-473). Immunoprecipitated DNA was purified with Qiagen MinElute kit, and 10 µg of DNA was used for library construction. Library was prepared using NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (E7645) and submitted to Genomic platform to perform massively parallel 50-bp sequencing in single-end mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were previously described (37 (link), 38 (link)). Cells were cross-linked in 1% formaldehyde for 15 minutes. Chromatin was sonicated to an average size of 400–600 bp and then 2 μg was immunoprecipitated with antibodies raised against NFATc1 (Thermo Scientific), p-STAT1 (Cell Signaling Technologies Inc., Danvers, MA), p-STAT3 (Cell Signaling) p-STAT4 (Cell Signaling Technologies), p-STAT5 (Cell Signaling), p-STAT6 (Cell Signaling), RNA Polymerase II (EMD Millipore Co., Billerica, MA), p300 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), H3K27ac (EMD Millipore), H3K4me1 (EMD Millipore), H3K4me3 (EMD Millipore), or CTCF (Rockland Immunochemicals Inc., Gilbertsville, PA). A negative control IgG (EMD Millipore) was also used in parallel. Following immunoprecipitation (IP) and washing, DNA from each IP was quantified by real-time PCR using a standard curve from sonicated murine genomic DNA. Each ChIP was performed from three independently isolated cell preparations and plotted as the average percent pulldown of input chromatin with standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed as described previously43 (link). Briefly, fixation of cells was done with formaldehyde and DNA was subsequently sheared by sonification with a Bioruptor (high, 15 cycles: 30′′on, 30′′off) (Diagenode, Liège, Belgium). For immunoprecipitation, Dynabeads (Invitrogen) were incubated 15 min with 5 μg of specific antibodies H3K4me3 (07–473; Merck-Millipore, The Netherlands), H3K79me2 (ab3594; Abcam), H3K79me3 (ab2621; Abcam), normal rabbit IgG (ab46540; Abcam), normal mouse IgG (12–371; Merck-Millipore), anti-FLAG (f1804; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-HA (101P-200; Covance, The Netherlands)) in 0.02% PBS–Tween-20, then unbound antibodies were washed off, and diluted sheared chromatin was added to the complex of magnetic Dynabeads-antibody (rotating overnight at 4 °C). After washing and elution with 2% SDS and 50 mmol l−1 NaHCO3, samples were treated with RNase and Proteinase K (Roche). DNA was purified using the Qiaquick DNA spin columns (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) according to the protocol. Subsequently, RT–PCR was performed with AbsoluteQPCR SYBRGreenROXMix (Thermo Scientific) using specific primers (Supplementary Table 5). The % input was expressed as AE (Ct input−Ct ChIP) × Fd × 100%, where Fd is a dilution compensatory factor and AE represents the primer efficiency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Characterization of Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed once with cold PBS and lysed by RIPA lysis buffer and incubated with 4 × SDS loading buffer at 95 °C for 10 min. Whole cell proteins were used for electrophoresis and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with Tris buffered saline containing 0.075% Tween-20 and 5% non-fat milk. Then the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The next day, membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature.
Antibodies used in this study included H3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9715; dilution 1:1000), H3K27me3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9733; dilution 1:1000), H3K27me2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9728; dilution 1:1000), H3K27me1 (Merck Millipore, 07-448; dilution 1:1000), H3K27ac (Cell Signaling Technology, 8173; dilution 1:1000), H3K4me3 (Merck Millipore, 04-745; dilution 1:1000), H3K36me3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4909; dilution 1:1000), H3K9me3 (Active Motif, 39161; dilution 1:1000), H3K79me2 (Abcam, ab3594; dilution 1:1000), p16 (Santa Cruz, sc-377412; dilution 1:200), β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, 3700, dilution 1:1000) (Supplementary Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibody Generation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibody against mouse C17orf96 was generated by immunizing rabbits (Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA) with a peptide corresponding to the N terminus of mouse C17orf96 (LKPRRGTPEFSPLC). Sera were obtained and the antibodies were positively selected using a purified GST-PLKPRRGTPEFSPLCL fusion protein and negatively selected using bacterial crude cell extract, each coupled to CNBr-activated Sepharose beads. Other used antibodies were Suz12 (Cell Signaling, no. D39F6 (ChIP); Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-46264/sc-271325 (Western)), p300 (Santa Cruz, sc-585), Tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, T9026), actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, ab3280), histone H3 (Abcam, ab1791), H3K27me3 (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, no. 07-449), H3K4me3 (EMD Millipore, no. 04-745), Flag M2 (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804), Flag M2 beads (Sigma-Aldrich, A2220) and HA.11 (MMS-101P, Covance).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP-qPCR for Histone Marks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin was prepared from 5x106 cultured Th1 or Th2 cells and immunoprecipitated using antibodies specific for acetylated histone H3 (H3ac; EMD Millipore, 06-599), trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3; EMD Millipore; 07-473) following a protocol described previously (26 (link)) with modifications: MNase was purchased from NEB, and sonication step was omitted. Immunoprecipitated and input samples were quantified by SYBR green (Bio-Rad) qPCR (LightCycler 480II, Roche) with previously described primers against the Il4 promoter (27 (link)). Values were normalized to that obtained for β2-microglobulin (26 (link)) and enrichment was expressed as percent input.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry of Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was carried out as described previously [7 (link)] with primary antibodies specific for H3K4me3, H3K9/14ac (EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA) or H2BK120ub (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Images of the CA1 region of the hippocampus were taken using Carl Zeiss LSM510 confocal laser scanning microscope and quantified using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed using the EZ-Magna ChIP assay kit (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were washed with PBS and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min. Chromatin was sonicated on ice to generate chromatin fragments of 200–1000 bp, and then immunoprecipitated with each antibody. Antibodies for acetylated histone H3 (AcH3, Merck Millipore), tri-methylated histone H3K4 (H3K4me3, Merck Millipore), and isotype IgG (negative control, Cell Signaling Technology) were used in the immunoprecipitations. The immunoprecipitated materials were then washed extensively, and cross-linking was reversed. DNA from the eluted chromatin was purified by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. Input control DNA or immunoprecipitated DNA was determined by quantitative real-time PCR. Standard curves were constructed using a pool of input samples, and each ChIP sample was normalized to its respective input. We designed primers to separately amplify five regions in the FABP4 promoter region. The primer pairs used for ChIP assays are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CUT&Tag: Profiling Chromatin Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cleavage Under Target and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) was performed as originally described in the protocol (Kaya-Okur et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, primary myoblasts were exposed to 4-hydroxytamoxifen (5 μM in primary growth medium) for 72h, refreshing the primary growth medium and 4-OHT at 24h intervals. Recovered myoblasts were then immobilized on Concanavalin A-coated paramagnetic beads and permeabilized with digitonin. Cells were incubated overnight with the corresponding antibodies: Nelf-E (Proteintech, Cat#10705-1-AP + Nelf-E(F-9) Santa Cruz, Cat#SC – 377052, mixed 1:1 ratio); RNAPII S5P (D9N5I - Cell Signaling Cat #13523); and H3K4me3 (EMD Millipore, Cat# 07-473). Tethered cells were washed thoroughly to remove unbound antibody, and then with pA-Tn5 for 60 min. Tn5 transposase mediated tagmentation was then initiated by the addition of MgCl2. Cellular DNA was extracted using Phenol/Chloroform/IsoamyI alcohol and then precipitated. Tagmented DNA libraries were generated as previously described (Kaya-Okur et al., 2019 (link)), and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Histone Modifications by ChIP-seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as described previously40 (link). Cells were transfected with siRNAs as described above and incubated for 72 h. Aliquots of cells (1 × 106 (link)) were then fixed and crosslinked, after which samples were immunoprecipitated for 12 h at 4 °C using a rabbit anti-acetylated histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27ac) pAb (#39,133; Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA), a rabbit anti-trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) mAb (#04–745; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), or normal mouse IgG (#140–09,511, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan), which served as a control. For ChIP-seq analysis, samples were sequenced using an Ion Proton System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing data were mapped to the human genome hg19 using bowtie2, after which peaks were called using MACS2 and were annotated using HOMER v4.11. ChIP-seq results were visualized using Microsoft Excel, Java TreeView and Integrative Genomics Viewer. ChIP-qPCR was carried out using PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sequences of the PCR primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The Gene Expression Omnibus accession number for the microarray data is GSE178613.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!