The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phase contrast microscope

Manufactured by Nikon
Sourced in Japan, United States, United Kingdom, China, Canada

The Phase-contrast microscope is an optical microscope that uses phase-contrast imaging to enhance the contrast of transparent samples. It allows the visualization of transparent, colorless specimens by converting differences in refractive index into differences in brightness, making it a valuable tool for observing living cells and other delicate samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

217 protocols using phase contrast microscope

1

Antimicrobial Potential of Streptococcus salivarius

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

S. salivarius K12 and M18 were cultured and centrifuged at 7,000g for 10 min. The antimicrobial level was tested using the supernatant. The antimicrobial susceptibility test followed the protocols from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (Bosy, 1997). In each well of a 96‐well polystyrene culture plate, 180 μL of BHI containing hemin and Vitamin K was added. Media of the two probiotics bacteria (180 μL) was added to the first well and serially diluted, each time by half, using a multipipette. After incubating for 36 hr under anaerobic conditions at 37°C, absorbance at 650 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer. To evaluate the effect of S. salivarius colonies inside the oral cavity, the bacteria were cocultured using millicel inserts (Millipore Co., Belleica, MA).
The bacteria causing malodor were inoculated on the inside of the millicell insert, and S. salivarius was inoculated on the outside. They were then incubated for 36 hr under anaerobic conditions at 37°C. Contamination of the bacteria was verified using a phase‐contrast microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The images of the bacteria were also obtained using a phase‐contrast microscope (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To further assess the effect of HSR2104 on LPS-stimulated cell mobility, transwell migration assays were performed as described previously [22 (link),23 (link)]. BV2 cells were seeded into the inserts (6.5 mm in diameter with an 8.0-μm pore size) of a Costar transwell system (Corning Inc., Kennebunk, ME, USA) at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics. After incubation, the bottom wells were filled with HSR2104 at various concentrations with or without LPS (1 μg/mL) in serum-free media. Control cells were treated with serum-free media containing 1% DMSO instead. After 24 h of treatment, non-migrated cells were gently removed with a cotton swab and the migrated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, followed by permeabilization with methanol for 10 min prior to staining with 0.5% crystal violet for 10 min, as described previously [23 (link),60 (link)]. Four random fields from each well were captured and the numbers of cells migrated through the membrane were counted under a Nikon phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA). The cell migration was expressed as a percentage of the respective vehicle-treated control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Cell Migration via Wound Healing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown to confluent on 12-well plates were starved for 4 h in an FBS-free medium and wounded across the cell monolayer by scraping the cells with a 200 μL pipette tip. Subsequently, the cells were treated as previously described [46 (link)], and images were captured every 2 h (from 0 to 12 h) and after 24 h by an inverted Nikon phase-contrast microscope (400× magnification) with a digital camera (Olympus IX81, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Migration was quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Assessing Cell Migration in BV2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BV2 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. To assess the migration of cells, the cells were equally wounded with a sterile 100-μL pipette tip [26 (link),59 (link),60 (link)]. To evaluate how the tested compounds affected the LPS-induced cell mobility, the cells were treated with 1 µg/mL LPS with and without a series of concentrations of HSR1101 or 10 µM of MAPK inhibitors for 24 h. Simultaneously, control cells were treated with serum-free media containing 1% DMSO instead. The relative cell migration during 24 h were determined by measuring the changes in the area of the wounds at 0 and 24 h under a Nikon phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA) [60 (link)], using ImageJ version 1.49 software obtained from National Institutes of Health homepage (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). The cell migration was expressed as the percentages of the respective vehicle-treated control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wound Closure and Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wound closure was performed as previously described[17 (link)]. Mitomycin C (10 μg/mL) was added to the cell culture medium to prevent cell proliferation during migration in the wound healing assay[6 (link),17 (link)]. Wound healing/closure was monitored by assessing the migration of cells for 24 h; photographs were taken at 0 and 24 h with a digital SPOT camera attached to an inverted Nikon phase-contrast microscope. The images were stored in TIF format and processed in Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Inhibitory Effects on Colon Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the inhibitory effects of NeoDP2, galactose, and AHG on colony formation by human colon cancer cells, HCT-116 cells (Korean Cell Line Bank, Seoul, Republic of Korea) were used. The HCT-116 cells were cultured on a 6-well soft agar plate for two weeks at 37 °C in the presence of various concentrations of NeoDP2, galactose, and AHG. Cell colonies were observed under a Nikon phase-contrast microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Migration Assay with Mitomycin C

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uniform vertical streaks were made in the monolayer culture with 200 μL pipette tips. The cells were immediately washed three times with RPMI medium with 10% FBS to remove detached cells. Mitomycin C (10 μg/mL; Sigma‐Aldrich) was added to the medium to inhibit proliferation, so that migration can be effectively followed.3 Mitomycin C is known to inhibit DNA synthesis using forming covalent crosslinks between complementary strands of DNA. This ultimately prevents separation of complementary strands of DNA, thereby inhibiting DNA replication. Cell migration was monitored for 24 hours, and pictures were taken at 0, 18, and 24 hours time points with a digital SPOT camera attached to an inverted Nikon phase contrast microscope (Nikon Inc., Melville, NY).
For wound closure assay in PC3 cells with KD of SOX2, siRNA KD of SOX2 was first performed on PC3 cells as described above. Twenty‐four hours post‐KD, the SOX2 siRNA transfected cells and nontargeting control siRNA transfected cells were replated in six‐well plates, grown overnight at 37°C, and allowed to reach near‐confluent levels. The wound closure assay was then performed as mentioned above. Parallel cultures were used to confirm SOX2 KD as compared with control siRNA‐treated cells
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intestinal Morphometry Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphometric analysis of the ileum (from Meckel’s diverticulum to the ileo-caeco-colic junction) was evaluated according to Giannenas et al [16 ]. One-centimetre-long segments were taken from the centre of each part and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for morphometrical assays under light microscopy. Formalin-fixed intestinal tissues were processed, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 3 μm and stained the haematoxylin-eosin method. Histological sections were examined with a Nikon phase contrast microscope coupled with a Microcomp integrated digital imaging analysis system (Nikon Eclipse 80i; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Images were viewed using a 4× Eplan objective (40×) to measure morphometric parameters of intestinal architecture. For this purpose, three favourably orientated sections cut perpendicularly from villus enterocytes to the muscularis mucosae were selected from each animal and measurements were carried as follows: villus height was estimated by measuring the vertical distance from the villus tip to villus-crypt junction level for 10 villi per section; crypt depth (the vertical distance from the villus-crypt junction to the lower limit of the crypt) was estimated for 10 corresponding crypts per section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histomorphometric Analysis of Quail Intestine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The abdominal cavity was opened after slaughter, and the entire small intestine system was removed for histomorphological analysis. Two centimeters of mid-duodenum (from the gizzard exit to the end of the pancreatic loop) were removed, rinsed by physiological saline solution and preserved in 10% buffered formalin [22 (link)]. The tissue samples were later embedded in paraffin, and a 5 µm section of each sample was placed on a glass slide and stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to Baurhoo et al. [23 (link)] The tissue sections were examined by a Nikon phase contrast microscope coupled with a micro-computer integrated digital imaging analysis system (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Nikon Co., Tokyo, Japan). The height and width of 30 villi and the depth of 30 crypts were measured from each group. Villus height was measured from tip (with a lamina propria) of the villus to the base (villus-crypt junction) and villus width was measured at its middle part, while the crypt depth was measured from the villus-crypt junction to the distal limit of the crypt [24 (link)]. Finally, the values of micro-morphological measurements of 10 quail/group were expressed as mean ± SE. The surface area was calculated according to this formula [25 ]:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Aze Modulates LPS-Induced Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BV2 cells were plated onto 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C until the cells reached 80–90% confluence. The cells were then wounded with a sterile scratcher (SPL, Korea) and treated with Aze at the concentrations of 1, 3, and 10 μM in the presence or absence of LPS, as previously reported [34 (link),35 (link)]. The effect of Aze on LPS-induced cell migration was determined by measuring the relative change in the width of the wounds over 24 h using ImageJ software. Images at 0 and 24 h were captured under a Nikon phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA). The degree of cell migration was presented as a percentage of the vehicle-treated control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!