The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

73 protocols using truseq chip library preparation kit

1

ChIP-seq Library Preparation Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP-seq libraries were prepared using the TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation Kits (Illumina IP-202-1012 and IP-202-1024), following the manufacturer’s instructions. About 8–10 ng of DNA (or the entire samples if there was less than this amount for some ChIP samples) was used as the starting materials, 16 cycles of PCR amplification were performed for all libraries. The libraries were first quantified using nanodrop, and appropriate dilutions were made for accurate quantification and size determination. The libraries were then quantified with Qubit fluorometer with Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Q32854), and the library sizes were determined by bioanalyzer, using Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Analysis (Agilent 5067-4626).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genome-wide Profiling of ChIP-seq Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Barcoded sequence libraries were generated using TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation Kits (Illumina, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, beginning with 5–10 ng of ChIP DNA from HL-60 cells. Sequencing data files were aligned to the hg19 human reference genome using Bowtie (version 1.1.2) and standard parameters. Peak calling and the analysis were performed using HOMER, which is freely available at http://biowhat.ucsd.edu/homer/. Only unique sequencing tags were considered in the analysis. Results were visualized by preparing custom tracks in the UCSC browser. Peaks were identified using a false discovery rate of < 0.1%, and IgG chromatin-derived DNAs from DMSO- or TPA-treated cells were used as controls. Identified peaks were annotated to the nearest transcription start site (TSS). Heatmaps were generated using HOMER and visualized with Java TreeView. ChIP fragment depth was calculated by extending sequencing tags by their estimated ChIP fragment lengths. The ChIP-seq data were submitted to the GEO database (GSE110566).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed as described before (Galbraith et al. 2013 (link)) and described in detail in the Supplemental Methods. Briefly, after drug or vehicle treatment, cells were cross-linked using 1% formaldehyde, washed twice with cold PBS, lysed in RIPA buffer, and cell lysates sonicated. Following immunoprecipitation with anti-TP53 antibody, immune complexes were washed, bound proteins eluted, and cross-linking reversed prior to DNA purification. Sequencing libraries were prepared using Illumina's TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation kit, and barcoded libraries sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was carried out as previously described (16 (link)). For immunoprecipitation, antibodies against H3K27Ac (ab4729, Abcam), SMAD3 (ab28379, Abcam) or RNAPII (sc899, Santa Cruz) were used in this paper. Quantitative analysis of the precipitated and input DNA through real-time PCR was described above. The primer sets for ChIP-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Results are pooled from at least three individual samples. For ChIP-seq, the precipitated DNA was followed library generation (TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation Kit, Illumina) and sequencing (NextSeq500 system, Illumina) performed by DNA Link, Inc. The generated reads were aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using MACS2 (30 (link)). BAM files for ChIP-seq data of RNAPII in multiple cell lines were downloaded from ENCODE (https://www.encodeproject.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ChIP-Seq Analysis of Mammary Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing was performed on pooled samples. Briefly, mammary tissues were dissected into small pieces and crosslinked using formaldehyde (1% w/v, methanol-free) followed by homogenization and chromatin preparation using a Covaris sonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, United States). Chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an appropriate antibody, washed, reverse-crosslinked, and DNA isolated using the phenol-chloroform method. Precipitated DNA was QC’ed by quantitative PCR using Mouse ChIP Control qPCR Primer Sets (Active Motiff, Carlsbad, CA United States). For ChIP-seq, 10 ng precipitated DNA was used to prepare the library using Illumina TruSeq ChIP library preparation kit following the manufacturer recommendations. Libraries were quantified for cluster generation using KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, United States). Sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq2500 using 50-bp single-end rapid run format. Sequencing quality was initially checked by running FastQC. Sequencing reads were aligned against mm9 by using Bowtie2. BAM files were normalized by depth after removal of PCR duplicates and blacklisted regions. Peaks were called using MACS2 with default parameters. For heatmap and metagene plots, ngs.plot program was used. UCSC genome browser was used to visualize individual gene tracks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIRP for Identifying lncRNA Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Chromatin Isolation by RNA Purification (ChIRP), we followed a previously described protocol35 (link). Briefly, 20 million cells were harvested and fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde solution (Sigma-Aldrich, G5882) for each reaction. ChIRP was performed using biotinylated oligo probes designed against mouse MaTAR25 using the ChIRP probe designer (Biosearch Technologies). Independent even and odd probe pools were used to ensure lncRNA-specific retrieval (refer to Supplementary Data 8 for odd and even sequences targeting MaTAR25, and probes targeting mouse Ppib transcripts which were used as negative controls). ChIRP-Seq libraries were constructed using the Illumina TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, IP-202-1012). Sequencing libraries were barcoded using TruSeq adapters and sequenced on Illumina NextSeq instruments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

ChIP-seq analysis of C/EBPα and PU.1 in B cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain samples for the ChiP-seq experiments biological duplicates of primary B cells expressing either C/EBPαWT ER or C/EBPαR35A ER were induced for 3 hr with E2 and 100,000 cells per sample processed by ChIPmentation, as described (Schmidl et al., 2015 (link)) (see also: https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.3542). Three µL of anti-C/EBPa antibody (Santa Cruz sc-61 14AA) or anti-PU1 (Santa Cruz sc-352 T21) were used per immunoprecipitation. Tagmentation of immobilized C/EBPa or PU1-enriched chromatin was performed for 5 min at 37 degrees in a 25 µL transposition reaction mix. Libraries were prepared with an Illumina TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation Kit and after quality control on Bioanalyzer sequenced (1 × 50 bp) on an Illumina HiSeq2500 instrument.
ChIP-seq data were processed similarly to ATAC-seq data (refer to ‘determination of differentially accessible ATAC peaksanalysis of ATAC-seq data’ section) with the following modifications: bamCoverage was used with: --binSize 1 --normalizeUsing RPKM --effectiveGenomeSize 215057000. Peak calling for each experiment was conducted using macs2 callpeak and the options -f BAMPE -g mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome-wide Binding Profile of Golgi Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coding sequences for HA-tagged HYH, GBF1, GBF2 and GBF3 were amplified by PCR from full-length cDNA clones using gene-specific primers listed in Table S3 and inserted into pEU-His vectors using appropriate restriction enzymes creating pEU-His-HYH-HA, pEU-His-GBF1-HA, pEU-His-GBF2-HA and pEU-His-GBF3-HA. A series of gDB-seq procedures including protein synthesis, immunoprecipitation and sequencing by MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), mapping of sequenced reads onto the genome by Bowtie 2 [33 (link)] and peak detection by MACS2 (q-value < 0.01) [34 (link)] have been described previously [6 (link)]. For constructing the gDB-seq library, a KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used instead of a TruSeq ChIP Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Binding motif sequences were predicted from gDB-seq data using the GADEM program [35 (link)]. JBrowse was used for visualization of the peak position of gDB-seq [36 (link)]. Promoters were defined as regions from 500 nt upstream to 200 nt downstream of the 5′ ends of genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP experiments were performed following manufacture instructions using iDeal ChIP-seq kit for transcription factors and for histones (Diagenode) with respectively a rabbit polyclonal anti-FLI1 antibody (Ab15289, Abcam) and a rabbit polyclonal anti-H3K27ac (Ab4729, Abcam). The Ewing sarcoma A673 cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and the Ewing sarcoma TC-71 cell line was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). STR-profiling proved each cell line matched with the reference profile provided by ATCC and DSMZ, respectively; and cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination by PCR. Briefly, the EWS cell lines were fixed for 10 min with 1% of methanol-free formaldehyde (28908, Thermo-Scientific). Chromatin was sonicated (Bioruptor, Diagenode) for 20 cycles (30-sec on, 30-sec off) set at position “high” to generate DNA fragments with an average size around 150–300pb. For ChIP sequencing, the libraries were generated using TruSeq ChIP library preparation kit (Illumina) and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2500 (single end, 100 bp). Reads were aligned to hg19 reference genome with Bowtie242 (link). Peaks were called with MACS243 (link) with the option narrow for FLI1 ChIP-seq and broad for H3K27ac ChIP-seq. For each cell line, ChIP-seq results were normalized according to their input sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP-seq Library Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP-seq library preparation was performed at the Weill Cornell Epigenomics Core Facility (New York) using the TruSeq ChIP library preparation kit (Illumina IP-202–1012) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform with 50 bp single end reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!