The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using megaview g2 camera

1

Nanoformulation Morphological Characterization by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological characterization of nanoformulations was performed by TEM CM12 (Philips, The Netherlands) equipped with an OLYMPUS Megaview G2 camera at accelerating voltage of 80 keV. Before the analyses, the samples were diluted in distilled water and placed onto a 200-mesh copper grid coated with carbon. Most of the sample was blotted from the grid with filter paper to form a thin film. After the adhesion of formulation, 5 μL of phosphotungstic acid solution (1% w/v in sterile water, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) were dropped onto the grid as a staining medium and the excess solution was removed with filter paper. Samples were dried for 3 min, after which they were examined with the electron microscope [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized Corneal Sample Preparation for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were further imaged by a CM12 Transmission Electron Microscope (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), operating at 80 kV and equipped with a MegaViewG2 camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). For TEM imaging, corneal samples were divided into 1 mm2 surface area fragments, which were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (0.1 M, pH 7.2) and then fixed with fresh glutaraldehyde (2.5%) in the same buffer at 4 °C for 12 h. Then all samples were sequentially washed three times (15 min) with phosphate-buffered saline, post-fixed with osmium tetroxide (1.0%) in the same buffer for 1 h, washed twice with the same buffer (15 min each), dehydrated with 30, 40 and 50% ethanol for 10 min, then 70% ethanol for 20 min, then 80, 95% and pure ethanol for 10 min and with pure propylene oxide for 10 min and finally infiltrated in a Spurr resin60 (link). Ultrathin sections of infiltrated samples were collected and deposited onto carbon-coated copper grids with 200 mesh size, stained with uranyl acetate in methanol (50%) for 5 min and with lead citrate for 8 min61 (link). Lead citrate was prepared as prescribed by Venable and Goggeshall62 (link). All washing procedures were carried out with CO2-free water upon bubbling with nitrogen for 30 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tau and Fibril Visualization via TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten microliter of tau K18 or 244-378 fibril solution was dropped onto 200-mesh Formvar carbon–coated nickel grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 20 min after which samples were stained with 25% uranyl acetate replacement (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min. Before the analysis, the staining solution was removed using Whatman filter paper, and the grids were air-dried for 5 min. Samples were visualized using a FEI Tecnai Spirit Transmission Electron Microscope operating at 120 kV and equipped with an Olympus MegaView G2 camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Glycerosomes Physicochemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Average hydrodynamic diameter (nm), polydispersity index (PdI) and ζ-potential (mV) of glycerosomes were measured by Dynamic and Electrophoretic Light Scattering, DLS-ELS (Zetasizer Nanoseries ZS90) by Malvern instrument (Worcestershire, UK) at 25 °C, with a scattering angle of 90 °C [26 (link)]. Glycerosomes were diluted using ultrapure water before measurements, in order to achieve a suitable scattering intensity. Successively, glycerosomes were observed by Transmission Electron Microscope, TEM (CM12 TEM, PHILIPS, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) equipped with an OLYMPUS Megaview G2 camera and with an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. A drop of sample, diluted 5-fold in water, was applied and dried by desiccation on a carbon film copper grid and it was counterstained with 1% (w/v) of phosphotungstic acid solution for 3 min. Then, the sample was examined at different amplifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Morphological Analysis of K-NLCs by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphologic analysis of K-NLCs was carried out by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on a TEM CM12 PHILIPS equipped with an OLYMPUS Megaview G2 camera at an accelerating voltage of 80 keV [41 (link)]. For the analyses, freeze-dried K-NLCs were dispersed in ultrapure water at the initial concentration and obtained nanoparticle dispersion was placed on a carbon film-covered copper grid. Subsequently, the excess of the sample was blotted from the grid with filter paper to obtain a thin film stained with a phosphotungstic acid solution (1% w/v) in distilled water. The analysis of the samples was performed 3 min after the staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of MCF-7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCF-7, MCF-7/Fulv, and MCF-7/Tam cells were cultured in a six-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well for 24 h and then a standard procedure was applied (21 (link)). Briefly, cells were washed once with PBS and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C for 2 h. After washing with PBS, cells were dehydrated by using a gradient of ethanol and finally incubated with 100% acetone for 15 min and embedded in SPURR resin. Ultrathin sections were taken and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and images were captured by using a JEOL 100S transmission electron microscope equipped with an Olympus MegaView G2 camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Characterization of Peptide-Loaded CNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of empty CNPs (ECNPs) and peptide-loaded CNPs was imagined with the measurement of particle diameter by a transmission electron microscope (TEM). A total of 5ul of sample was dropped on a 300 mesh formvar carbon-supported grid (TedPella, Inc.) and incubated for 3 min. Then, the grid was dried using filter paper. Afterwards, the sample was stained for contrast with UranyLess solution (EMS) for 1 min. The grid was dried again by filter paper. TEM images were then collected on a JEOL-JEM 1400 electron microscope operating at 120 kV through a MegaView G2 camera (Olympus) equipped with iTEM Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH 5.2 imaging software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electron Microscopy Brain Tissue Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For electron microscopy studies, brains were processed as previously described. In brief, brain samples were fixed by immersion in 4% glutaraldehyde, buffered to pH 7.3 with Millonig's fluid, post‐fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer, and dehydrated in acetone for embedding in Araldite (Sigma). Ultrathin sections were obtained using an OM‐U3 ultramicrotome (Reichert, Vienna, Austria), double‐stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined using a JEM 1010 electron microscopy (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at the ICTS Spanish National Centre for Electron Microscopy. Images were recorded using a MegaView G2 camera using iTEM Imaging Platform software (Olympus, Münster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of AuNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the synthesized AuNPs with sizes of 10 nm and 30 nm was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). On a copper grid covered in a Formvar-carbon membrane (300 mesh, Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA, USA)), 5–10 L of an aqueous dispersion was first applied and air dried at room temperature. Ultrastructural and morphometric analysis of the gold nanoparticles was performed using a TEM model JEM 1010 (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a MEGAVIEW G2 camera and the cooperating iTEM Digital Imaging Solutions program (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Münster, Germany). The average diameter of the AuNPs reached about 10.5 nm +/− 1.3 nm and 30.9 nm +/− 1.8. The UV–VIS measurements were performed using a Jasco 650v (ABL&E-JASCO, Kraków, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nerve Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nerve samples collected from each group were processed for TEM according to the chemical fixation and embedding protocol (Hayat, 2000) [44 ]. Briefly, they were prefixed for 2 h in glutaraldehyde 2.7% in phosphate buffer 0.1 M, pH 7.4 and postfixed for 1.5 h in OsO4 1.5% in phosphate buffer 0.15 M, pH 7.4. Then, the samples were dehydrated in ethanol solution of increasing concentrations (30 minutes each), and infiltrated with EMBED 812. The sections double contrasted for 10 minutes with 13% uranyl acetate and for 5 min with 2.8% lead citrate were examined on a Jeol JEM 1011 transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a Mega View G2 camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, Münster, Germany).
Nerve samples from the CMNPs treatment group were analyzed using a Hitachi HD-2700 scanning transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High-Tech, Krefeld, Germany), which was equipped with an X-Max 1160 energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) detector (Oxford Instruments, Wiesbaden, Germany) to characterize their compositional structure. The EDX is considered a valuable instrument in every research that necessitates elemental determination, either endogenous or exogenous, in the tissue, cell, or other new types of analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!