The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using spot imaging software

1

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well millicell hanging insert (Millipore) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 1 × 105 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 or 48-h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For detection of migration and invasion of α 2 δ 1 + cells, 5 × 10 4 cells were added onto a porous membrane (pore size, 8  μ m; BD Biosciences) that was coated with 2 mg/mL Matrigel. After 48-hour incubation at 37 C, cells were washed three times with PBS, and fixed with 4% neutral formaldehyde prior to routine hematoxylin staining for 5 min. The number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 representative fields at × 20 magnification. Images were acquired and analyzed using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Invasion and Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion and migration assays were conducted in 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences) or 24-well Millicell hanging inserts (Millipore). Cells re-suspended in serum free DMEM were added to the top chamber and DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 48 hrs incubation at 37°C, the number of cells that invaded through the Matrigel (invasion) or membrane (migration) was counted in 10 fields under 4x objective lens and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell ability of migration and invasion were performed using 24-well migration chamber (Corning, NY) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences, CA) with polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-based membrane of 8.0-um pore size. In Brief, 1x105 cells were suspended with serum-free culture medium and seeded in the top chambers. Complete culture medium with 10% FBS was used in the bottom chambers. The chambers were collected after 24/48 hours’ incubation. Cells which moved through the membrane were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution. The number of cells invaded through the membrane per field were counted and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon) under microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of iPSC-Derived Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data for each iPSC line are from two to six independent experiments with three technical replicates within each experiment. Within each immunocytochemistry-based experiment, at least five images were taken on each of at least three different fluorescently labeled coverslips per time point per line using a Nikon inverted microscope and Spot imaging software. The images were analyzed for antigen specificity using MetaMorph Software (Molecular Devices). Calcium imaging data were collected from a minimum of three coverslips per time point from each line. A minimum of 25 neurons were recorded from each coverslip. In all experiments, the evaluator was blinded to the cell line and treatment condition. Data were statistically analyzed with Prism software (GraphPad) first for normality using the D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test, followed by the parametric one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test of significance or the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test of significance; α = 0.05. Student’s t test was used when appropriate. Data are presented as the average ± SEM with the statistical test used indicated in each figure legend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transwell Migration and Matrigel Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transwell migration assays, 1 × 105 cells were added to the top non-coated chamber (24-well insert; pore size, 8μm; BD Biosciences). For Matrigel invasion assays, 2 × 105 cells were plated in the top chamber with Matrigel-coated membrane (24-well insert; pore size, 8 μm; BD Biosciences). In both assays, cells were plated in RPM1640 medium without serum or growth factors, and RPM1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS was used as a chemoattractant in the lower chamber. The cells were incubated for 18h and cells that did not migrate or invade through the pores were removed by a cotton swab. Cells on the lower surface of the membrane were fixed and stained with crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich). The number of cells was counted in ten fields under a ×20 objective lens and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well millicell hanging insert (Millipore) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 1×105 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 h or 48 h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescence Imaging Quantifies Antigen Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At least five images were taken on each of at least three different fluorescently labeled coverslips per timepoint using a Nikon inverted microscope and Spot imaging software. All experiments were repeated at least 2 times. The images were analyzed for antigen specificity using MetaMorph Software (Molecular Devices Inc.). Data were statistically analyzed via one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test as appropriate with Prism software, α = 0.05 (GraphPad). Data are presented as the average ± S.E.M. using two independent control lines and two independent SMA lines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed in 24-well milli-cell hanging insert (BD Biosciences) or 24-well BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences). In brief, 5 × 104 cells were seeded to the top chamber and 10% FBS in medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemoattractant. After 24 or 48 h incubation, the number of cells that invaded through the membrane (migration) or Matrigel (invasion) was counted in 10 fields and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transwell Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration assay was conducted in 24‐well Transwell chambers (Corning Costar Corporation, Corning, NY, USA). After 24-hour transfection, cells were suspended in 0.5 ml serum-free medium and loaded on the top chamber, and medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the bottom chamber as the chemoattractant. After 36 hours of incubation at 37 °C, cells that had migrated through the membrane were fixed with formaldehyde and stained with 1% crystal violet for 30 minutes. The migrated cells attached to the lower surface of the membrane insert were counted in five random fields under a 20× objective lens and imaged using SPOT imaging software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Three independent experiments were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!