The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using beckman system gold hplc

1

Serum Protein Depletion for Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of highly abundant proteins can interfere with the resolution and sensitivity of the proteomic techniques used to analyse the serum profiles. For this reason, serum samples were depleted by immunoaffinity chromatography using a Multiple Affinity Removal System (MARS) column (4.6 mm ID × 100 mm, Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA) containing antibodies against the six most abundant serum proteins: albumin, IgG, IgA, transferrin, haptoglobin and alpha-1-antitrypsin. The depletion is expected to remove about 88-92% of the total protein content. Removal was performed according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Briefly, 200 μL of diluted sample were injected in a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The low-abundance protein fractions eluted were aliquoted and stored at −20°C until analysis. The QC was also depleted following the same procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Reversed-phase HPLC analysis of venoms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography was performed on a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) as described previously for each pooled venom as well as a reference venom sample from a single individual (Margres et al., 2015a (link), 2016 (link), b; Wray et al., 2015 (link)). Briefly, 100 μg of total protein were injected onto a Jupiter C18 column, 250 × 4.6 mm (Phenomenex, Torrence, CA) using the solvent system of A =0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water and B = 0.075% TFA in acetonitrile. After five minutes at 5% B, a 1% per minute linear gradient of A and B was run to 25% B, followed by a 0.25% per minute gradient from 25 to 65% B at a flow rate of 1 mL per minute. Column effluent was monitored at 220 and 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Protein Adsorption to Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SE-HPLC was used to identify the amount of monomer and high molecular weight species in samples. A TSKgel G3000SWXL column (TOSOH Biosciences, Montgomeryville Pennsylvania) was used with a Beckman System Gold® HPLC (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California). The mobile phase consisted of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) composed of 11.9 mM phosphates, 137 mM sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride (pH 7.4). The flow rate used was 0.8 mL/min, and 100 μL of each sample were injected into the column. The absorbance of the eluent was monitored at 280 nm using a System Gold® 168 detector and 32 Karat™ analysis software. Chromatograms were analyzed in GRAMS/AI software version 9.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts). Areas under peaks were determined by integration. The fraction of protein adsorbed to silicone oil microdroplets or alum microparticles was determined by the following equation:
Fraction of protein adsorbed=(1area underpeaksamplearea underpeakcontrol) Control samples consisted of protein samples without silicone oil microdroplets or alum microparticles and were treated identically to protein samples that contained particles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Free Amino Acid Profiling in Grapes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free amino acid content was determined in lyophilized samples of mature grapes. Extraction was performed by adding 25 mL of Milli-Q H2O to 1 g of grape berry powder, and the quantification of natural free amino acids (excluding tryptophan) was assessed in a Biochrom 30 Amino Acid Analyzer with a weak acidic cation exchange resin acting as the stationary phase (200 × 4.6 mm column) and a number of weak acidic Li-citrate buffers acting as the mobile phase. Stepwise pH, temperature and salt concentration gradients were applied. Detection after post column derivatization with Ninhydrin (135 °C ) at 570 or 440 nm was performed (Ansynth Service B.V., Roosendaal, The Netherlands). For tryptophan quantification, the sample solutions were diluted in Milli-Q H2O (1:10), and analysis was performed using a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman, Brea, CA, USA) equipped with an Allsphere C8 column, 250 × 4.6 mm, stationary phase, (P.J. Cobert Associates, Inc. St. Louis, MO, USA) and using a phosphate buffer/MeOH gradient (mobile phase). Detection was performed by fluorometry, with the emission wavelength set at 340 nm and the excitation wavelength set at 280 nm (Ansynth Service B.V., Roosendaal, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Liposomal Formulation Characterization for Drug Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liposomal formulations were characterized in citrate buffer (10 mM citrate buffer, 145 mM NaCl, pH 6.0) according to their mean hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index in a Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK), and surface charge in a Zetasizer Nano Z (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The absence of quercetin crystals was evaluated by microscopy over time, and the lipid quantification was performed by the Rouser method [17 (link)].
Drug quantification was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in a Purospher® STAR RP-18 endcapped (5 µm) HPLC column, 4.6 × 250 mm (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), using a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman Coulter, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Liposomes containing drug were disrupted with methanol, with the concomitant solubilization of quercetin, and filtered through a PTFE membrane with 0.2 µm pore diameter before quantification at 360 nm with a mobile phase consisting of methanol/water acidified with 1 mM trifluoroacetic acid (70:30, v/v).
Nanoformulations were evaluated in terms of loading capacity, defined as the final drug-to-lipid ratio (µg quercetin/µmol lipid)–([Drug]/[Lipid])f–, and the incorporation efficiency (I.E.) that was determined according to the following equation: I.E.=([Drug][Lipid])f([Drug][Lipid])i×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Diclofenac in Plasma Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diclofenac in plasma samples, were analysed by using a validated HPLC method as previously described (Naidoo et al., 2007 (link)). In brief, plasma samples (200 µl) were mixed with diethyl ether (400 µl), 0.3 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate (400 µl) and vortexed. The organic layer was separated in an ice bath (methanol/solid carbon dioxide), evaporated to dryness and dissolved in 400 µl mobile phase. Samples were analysed on a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). Separation was achieved with a C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5 µm; Thermo Scientific, Runcorn, UK). The mobile phase consisted of 0.05 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate (pH  = 4.85 to 4.89):CH3CN, 42.5:57.5. One hundred (100) µl of the reconstituted samples was injected onto the column at 1 ml/min in an isocratic run. Detection of diclofenac was carried out at 275 nm. The total runtime per sample was 8 min with retention times of 4.9 min. Control values (100–0.39 µg/ml) showed a mean accuracy of 99%. When sufficient time points were available, samples were analysed by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis (Thermo Fisher Kinetica 5.1, USA) using the standard settings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of OspA Desorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on a Beckman System Gold HPLC (model 126, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Brea, CA, USA) with a TDA detector (Model 302, Viscotek, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK), using a Zorbax 300SB-C3 column (4.6 × 150 mm; 5 μm) and a Zorbax 300SB-C3 Guard 5 μm pre-column (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Mobile phase used for gradient elution: A = 0.1% (v/v) TFA in water and B = 0.1% (v/v) TFA in ACN. The elution program comprised a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min with linear gradient from 5% B to 59% B over a period of 2 min, a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min at 59% B for 3 min, a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min with linear gradient from 59% B to 100% B over a period of 2 min and a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min at 100% B for 5 min. The column temperature was controlled at 40 °C. Detection was performed at UV 219 nm. Sample volume injected was 10 μl. OspA desorption from aluminum gel was performed by adding 150 mg of tri-sodium citrate per 1 ml of vaccine and incubation overnight at 5 °C under agitation. Aluminum gel was removed by centrifugation 10 min at 2190 g and supernatant was concentrated using ultrafiltration spinners 10 k MWCO according supplier recommendations (ThermoFischer, Rockford, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying rmGH Monomers and HMWS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amounts of monomer and high molecular weight species (HMWS) in rmGH samples were determined by SE-HPLC. Following previously described methods,39 (link) a TSKgel G3000SWXL column (TOSOH Biosciences, Montgomeryville Pennsylvania) was used with a Beckman System Gold® HPLC (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California), System Gold® 168 detector, and 32 Karat analysis software. Chromatograms were analyzed in GRAMS/AI software version 9.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spectrophotometric Biomass Quantification and HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically (Cintra 202 GBC DBUV instrument, Australia) at 590 nm. Nutrient medium was used as a blank. Absorbance values at 590 nm were converted into biomass concentration (g DW/l), using a standard curve. DW was determined by centrifuging the cultures (Hettrich Zentrifugen Universal 320), as described previously in Lima-Costa et al. [6] . Sugars and ethanol analyses were performed by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using samples previously centrifuged at 13,400 ×g for 10 min. Analyses were performed on a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman, USA) equipped with a Jasco 1530 refractive index detector (Jasco, Japan). To analyze sugar concentrations, a Purospher STAR NH 2 column (Merck KGaA, Germany) was used with an isocratic elution of acetonitrile:water (75:25) at 35ºC. Ethanol determinations were performed on an OH AY column (Merck KGaA, Germany), at room temperature, with an isocratic elution of 0.002 N H 2 SO 4 at 0.5 ml/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Yeast Peptide Separation by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides resulting from
in-solution digestion were loaded on a Beckman Gold HPLC system (Beckman
Coulter, Brea, CA; dual pump model 125; UV–vis detector model
166) and separated by reversed-phase chromatography using an EC 250/4.6
Nucleosil 120-3 μm C18 column (Machery-Nagel, Düren,
Germany). At a constant flow rate of 500 μL/min, 1.4 mg of digested
yeast proteins were eluted within 2 h. Solvents for HPLC were 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid (solvent A) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in
85% acetonitrile (solvent B). The gradient started at 4% solvent B
for 14.5 min was increased to 60% solvent B in 90 min, up to 100%
B in 4 min, and was held at 100% B for 11.5 min. Fraction collection
was initiated with a time delay of 5 min after injection at 30 s intervals
for 80 min and at 1 min intervals for a further 22 min. A total of
182 fractions were collected, lyophilized, and stored dry at −20
°C. Prior to capillary electrophoresis, the peptides were dissolved
in 15 μL of ammonium acetate (50 mM, pH 4.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!