The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using in fusion pcr cloning system

1

Generation of GDF15 Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression vector for C-terminally Flag-tagged full-length human GDF15 was obtained from Genscript. The C211G mutant was generated by site-directed mutagenesis of the wild-type vector using the QuikChange II protocol (Agilent). To generate the Myc-tagged versions, the sequences corresponding to Flag tags were replaced by those encoding for Myc tags using the In-Fusion PCR cloning system (Takara) according to the kit’s guidelines. All plasmid sequences were confirmed by direct nucleotide sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Generation of Epitope-Tagged GDF15 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression vector for C-terminally Flag-tagged full-length human GDF15 was obtained from Genscript. The C211G mutant was generated by site-directed mutagenesis of the wild-type vector using the QuikChange II protocol (Agilent). To generate the Myc-tagged versions, the sequences corresponding to Flag tags were replaced by those encoding for Myc tags using the In-Fusion PCR cloning system (Takara) according to the kit’s guidelines. All plasmid sequences were confirmed by direct nucleotide sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning and Culturing C. elegans Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wild-type strain N2 Bristol and all the mutants were cultured on the nematode growth medium (NGM) plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50 at 20 °C following the standard protocol (Brenner, 1974). Standard cloning procedure of Clontech In-Fusion PCR Cloning System was used to construct all the plasmids. PCR products were produced by Phusion DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) or TransStart FastPfu DNA Polymerase (Transgen Biotech) or High-Fidelity Master Mix (TsingKe Biotech) following standard procedures. All the strains and plasmids used are listed in Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Table 3, and Supplementary Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In-frame deletions of pucBAa and pucBAd

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-frame deletions of pucBAa and pucBAd were created by PCR using the Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) to amplify 1 kb of DNA upstream of the second codon in the coding region for each of these genes and 1 kb of DNA downstream of the stop codon for each of these genes. These fragments were then incorporated into PstI-digested (pucBAa) or NotI/PstI-digested (pucBAd) pJQ200SK suicide vector (28 (link)) using the in-Fusion PCR cloning system (Clontech). All plasmids were mobilized into R. palustris by conjugation with E. coli S17-1, and double-crossover events for deletions or allelic exchange were achieved using a previously described selection and screening strategy (29 (link)). All deletions were verified using PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cloning and Expression of clr-1 in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N2 was used as the wild type strain and animals were cultured at 20°C(clr-1(e1745ts) mutant and control worms were cultured at 15°C then shifted to 25°C for phenotype analysis) on the Escherichia coli OP50 seeded nematode growth medium plates according to a standard method (Brenner, 1974). Standard cloning procedure of Clontech In-Fusion PCR Cloning System was used. A 4.6kb genomic DNA upstream clr-1 start codon was cloned to the pPD95.77 vector to construct the Pclr-1::GFP plasmid. PCR products were polymerized by Phusion DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) or TransStart FastPfu DNA Polymerase (Transgen Biotech). All the strains and plasmids used are listed in Table S1 and S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Subcellular Localization of SiYGL2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full-length cDNA of SiYGL2, excluding the stop code, was amplified from Yugu1 using the following primers: 5′TATCTCTAGAGGATCCCTATCCTCCTTCGGTCCTTCCCATT 3′ and 5′ TGCTCACCATGGATCCGAACGAAGTAACAAGCCCTACACCT 3′ [the underlined sequences are adaptors for In-fusion® PCR cloning system (Cat no. 072012, Clontech, United States) and contain BamHI cleavage sites]. The cDNA sequences were cloned into the p16318hGFP vector to form fusion proteins with the C-terminus of GFP. These vectors were then transfected into foxtail millet protoplasts by PEG-mediated transformation and detected by confocal microscopy (LSM700, Carl Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cloning and Mutagenesis of CRISPR Cas Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from Sth as described previously (Hill et al., 1991 (link)) with minor modifications. Cells were not treated with proteinase K, and the DNA was precipitated with isopropanol/ammonium acetate prior to phenol/chloroform extraction. DNA primers specific to Sth cas6 and cse3 (cas6e) genes (listed in Table S1) were designed and ordered from Eurofins MWG Operon. The primers were used to amplify cas6 and cse3 (cas6e) from Sth genomic DNA using the Expand High Fidelity PCR system (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The genes were cloned into the pET24d plasmid using the In Fusion PCR cloning system (Clontech) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Colonies were screened by PCR, and nucleotide sequences of positive clones were confirmed by DNA sequencing. These constructs were used to generate mutant cas6 and cse3 (cas6e) constructs using specific primers (listed in table S1) and the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The nucleotide sequences of mutant constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cloning and Characterization of TFPI and SERPINE1 Promoters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human TFPI promoter Firefly-luciferase reporter (TFPI-Luc), a pGL3-Basic vector containing a fragment of TFPI promoter from -1224 to +45, was previously described [37 (link)]. SERPINE1 promoter (-483/+75) [38 (link)] was PCR amplified from THP1 genomic DNA then inserted in place of the CMV promoter in the pd4EGFP plasmid (Clontech) that contains the sequence coding for a destabilized version of EGFP. The resulting vector was named SERPINE1-dEGFP. GFP-tagged MAST2 expression vector (RG206492 form Origene) was used as template to PCR amplify only the full-length coding sequence of MAST2 (without the GFP coding sequence), which was then cloned into pCDNA3 vector using the In-Fusion PCR cloning system (Clontech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Investigating ScDREB10 Transcriptional Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the transcriptional activity of ScDREB10, the yeast two-hybrid system (Y2H) with pGBKT7 vector and Y2H yeast strain were used (Clontech). The coding sequence of ScDERB10 was fused in frame with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (pGBKT7 vector) to produce the fusion construct of BD-ScDREB10 using the in-fusion PCR cloning system (Clontech); the full-length ORF of ScDREB10 was amplified from pMD18-T plasmids by PCR using gene-specific primers containing EcoR I and BamH I restriction sites, and the PCR product was inserted into the EcoR I/BamH I pGBKT7 vector. The construct was subsequently introduced into yeast Y2H Gold cells (Clontech). The yeast positive transformants were adjusted to an OD600 of 2.0, and the yeast cells were then 10-fold serially diluted and dropped with 2 µL on synthetic dropout (SD) medium without tryptophan (SD/−Trp), without tryptophan and histidine (SD/−Trp−His), and with SD/−Trp−His plates containing x-α-gal (5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl α-d-galactopyranoside) (SD/−Trp−His + x-α-gal). Yeast cells expressing containing the pGBKT7 empty vector or expressing GAL4 were used as the negative and positive control, respectively. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 to 4 days before photographing. The primer information was listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Generating Zebrafish Dystrophin Transgenic Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT‐PCRs were performed on total RNA isolated from 3‐dpf‐old wild‐type larvae to generate partial dystrophin cDNA constructs, which were combined using the InFusion system (Clontech). The assembled cDNA encoded for dystrophin A0A0R4IXX0 (UniProt) missing P3531 and Q3532 of exon 76. According to previous dystrophin cloning results,24 exon 78 (ENSDARE00001210285) was found to be non‐coding due to insertion of an additional exon between the annotated exons 77 (ENSDARE00001123314) and 78, resulting in GGRLNP at the C‐terminal end of dystrophin. The eGFP open reading frame was added at the 3′ end to the dystrophin cDNA, which was then placed into pDONR221 of the Gateway cloning system (Invitrogen) resulting in pME‐dmdGFP. pME‐dmd∆ex1‐7GFP was prepared by the InFusion PCR cloning system (Clontech) using pME‐dmdGFP as template and the primers cDMD55F (5′‐gcaggctatgttgctacagtccatccaga‐3′) and cDMD66R (5′‐agcaacatagcctgcttttttgtacaaagtt‐3′). Both cloned plasmids were combined with p5E‐acta1, p3E‐polyA and pDestTol2pACryGFP to generate pcryGFP‐acta1‐dmdGFP and pcryGFP‐acta1‐dmd∆ex1‐7GFP.25, 26, 27 The resulting plasmids were microinjected into wild‐type 1‐cell stage embryos to generate the transgenic lines Tg(cry:GFP,acta1:dmdGFP) and Tg(cry:GFP,acta1:dmd∆ex1‐7GFP). Animal experiments were approved by IBC/22219.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!