The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rat anti mouse cd11b apc cy7

Manufactured by BioLegend

Rat anti-mouse CD11b-APC-Cy7 is a fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibody that binds to the mouse CD11b antigen. CD11b is a cell surface integrin expressed on myeloid cells, including monocytes, macrophages, and granulocytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using rat anti mouse cd11b apc cy7

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PE-CF594 rat anti-mouse CD24 (562477, 2.5:100), BB515 rat anti-mouse I-A/I-E (MHCII 565254, 1.25:100) and PE rat anti-mouse IgG1 κ isotype control (554685, 5:100) were purchased from the BD Bioscience company. PerCP-Cy5.5 rat anti-mouse CD45 (45-0451-82, 1:100), APC rat anti-mouse IgG2b κ isotype control (17-4031-82, 1.25:100) and APC rat anti-mouse CD206 (17-2061-82, 1.25:100) were purchased from eBioscience. The PE rat anti-mouse α7AChR (sc-58607PE, 5:100) was purchased from Santa Cruz. APC-Cy7 rat anti-mouse CD11b (101226, 2.5:100), PE-Cy7 hamster anti-mouse CD11c (117318, 1.25:100) , Brilliant Violet 421 rat anti-mouse CD86 (105032, 1:100) , Brilliant Violet 421 rat IgG2a κ isotype control (400536, 1:100) , APC rat anti-mouse CD24 (138506, 3.75:100) and Brilliant Violet 421 mouse anti-mouse CD64 (139309, 1:100) were purchased from the Biolegend. Lipid droplet dye, BODIPY™ 493/503 (D-3922, 1:200) was purchased from the Invitrogen. Rabbit anti-mouse CD68 antibody (BA3638, 1:100) was purchased from Boster. Rabbit anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (GB11027, 1:800) was purchased from Servicebio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nasal Mucosal Cell Isolation and Flow Cytometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunized and challenged mice were killed under anesthesia conditions, to collect the nasal cavity by excision with scissors. The cells of the nasal mucosa were then collected by using sharp curettes in a dish filled with RPMI-1640 medium containing 2% NCS (Equitech Bio). These cell suspensions were filtered through 100 µm cell strainers (Corning). After treating with red blood cell lysis buffer for 1 min, cell samples were first incubated (15 min at room temperature) with anti-mouse CD16/32 monoclonal antibody (BioLegend; 93; 1:100) to avoid non-specific staining and with 7-aminoctinomycin D (7-AAD; BioLegend; 1:100) to detect dead cells and exclude them from the analysis. Then, the cell samples were stained with the following fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C: fluorescein isothiocyanate – rat anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend; 1A8 1:100), APC rat anti-mouse CD45 (BD Biosciences A20; 1:100), APC-Cy7-rat anti-mouse CD11b (BioLegend M1/70; 1:100). Samples fluorescently labeled with monoclonal antibodies were fixed at 4 °C overnight with sterile PBS (Nacalai Tesque) containing 1% paraformaldehyde (Nacalai Tesque). Samples were examined by using a MACSQuant flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA), and data analysis was performed with FlowJo 9.9 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Alveolar Macrophage Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAL cells were blocked with 1% BSA containing TruStain fcX (anti-mouse CD16/32) antibody (101319; BioLegend), followed by staining with antibodies. Antibodies used: Rat anti-mouse CD45-PE (12–0451–82; eBiosciences), LIVE Dead-eflour506 (65–0866; Invitrogen), Rat anti-mouse CD11b-APC-Cy7 (101225; BioLegend), anti-mouse CD64-PE-Cy7 (139313; BioLegend), Rat anti-mouse Ly6G-AF700 (561236; BD), Rat anti-mouse Siglec F-APC (155507; BioLegend), and Rat anti-mouse Ly6C: eflour450 (48–5932–82; Invitrogen). Hierarchical gating strategy was used to represent the resident alveolar macrophages as CD45+CD11b+/Ly6GCD64+Ly6cSiglec Fhi and monocyte-derived macrophages as CD45+CD11b+/Ly6GCD64+Ly6cSiglec Flow. To determine cell number, CountBright Absolute Counting Beads (Molecular Probes) were added according to manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, counting beads were gently vortexed and 50 μl was added to stained cells in a volume of 300 μl. Counting beads were gated on forward versus linear side scatter. The following equation was used to determine cell number: (number of cell events/number of bead events) × (lot specific bead count per 50 μl/volume of sample). Data was acquired on FACSAria II or LSR II (BD Biosciences) using BD FACS DIVA software (version 8.0.1). Data was analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC) software (Version 10.5.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Flow Cytometry Macrophage Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were stained with MitoTracker green (50 nM) for mitochondrial localization. Data were collected with a Becton Dickinson LSR‐II flow cytometer using FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and further analyzed with FlowJo software (version 8.5.2; TreeStar). BAL cells were blocked with 1% BSA containing TruStain fcX (anti‐mouse CD16/32) antibody (101319; BioLegend), followed by staining with antibodies. Antibodies used: Rat anti‐mouse CD45‐PE (12‐0451‐82; eBiosciences), LIVE Dead‐eflour506 (65‐0866; Invitrogen), Rat anti‐mouse CD11b‐APC‐Cy7 (101225; BioLegend), anti‐mouse CD64‐PE‐Cy7 (139313; BioLegend), Rat anti‐mouse Ly6G‐AF700 (561236; BD), Rat anti‐mouse Siglec F‐APC (155507; BioLegend), Rat anti‐mouse Ly6C: eflour450 (48‐5932‐82; Invitrogen), Rat anti‐mouse MHC II‐PerCP‐Cy5.5 (562363; BD), and Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Annexin V FITC and PI (V13242, Molecular Probes). Hierarchical gating strategy was used to represent the resident alveolar macrophages as CD45+CD11b+/−Ly6GCD64+Ly6cSiglec Fhi and monocyte‐derived macrophages as CD45+CD11b+/−Ly6GCD64+Ly6cSiglec Flow. Data were acquired on FACSAria II or LSR II (BD Biosciences) using BD FACS Diva software (version 8.0.1). Data were analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC) software (Version 10.5.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identifying Tissue-Resident and Monocyte-Derived Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAL cells were blocked with 1% BSA–containing TruStain fcX (anti–mouse CD16/CD32) antibody (101319, BioLegend), followed by staining with antibodies. Antibodies used were rat anti–mouse CD45-PE (12-0451-82, eBioscience), LIVE/DEAD–eFluor 506 (65-0866, Invitrogen), rat anti–mouse CD11b–APC-Cy7 (101225, BioLegend), anti–mouse CD64–PE-Cy7 (139313, BioLegend), rat anti–mouse Ly6G–Alexa Fluor 700 (561236, BD Biosciences), rat anti–mouse Siglec F–APC (155507, BioLegend), rat anti–mouse Ly6C–eFluor 450 (48-5932-82, Invitrogen), and rat anti–mouse MHC II–PerCP-Cy5.5 (562363, BD Biosciences). A hierarchical gating strategy was used to represent the TRAMs as CD45+CD11b+/–Ly6GCD64+Ly6CSiglec Fhi and MDMs as CD45+CD11b+/–Ly6GCD64+Ly6CSiglec Flo. Data were acquired on a FACSAria II or LSR II (BD Biosciences) using BD FACS DIVA software (version 8.0.1). Data were analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC) software (version 10.5.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Murine Lung Cell Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse lung was digested and single-cell suspensions were prepared as previously described (46 (link)). Cell suspensions underwent red blood cell lysis using Pharm Lyse buffer (BD Biosciences). Live/dead staining was performed in protein-free solution (HBSS) using fixable viability dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience), followed by incubation with FcR-blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec). Antibodies utilized for murine cell staining included rat anti–mouse CD45–FITC (BioLegend, 30-F11), rat anti–mouse Ly6C–eFluor450 (eBiosciences, HK1.4), rat anti–mouse I-A/I-E–PerCPCy5.5 (BioLegend, M5/114.15.2), rat anti–mouse CD45–APC (BioLegend, 30-F11), rat anti–mouse Ly6G–Alexa Fluor 700 (BioLegend, 1A8), rat anti–mouse NK1.1–Alexa Fluor 700 (BD, PK136), rat anti–mouse CD11b–APCCy7 (BioLegend, M1/70), rat anti–mouse CD64–PE (BioLegend, X54-5/7.1), rat anti–mouse SiglecF–PECF594 (BD, E50-2440), and rat anti–mouse CD11c–PECy7 (BD, HL3). For neutrophil quantification, 123Count eBeads (Invitrogen) were added. Flow analysis of fixed samples was done on a BD FACSymphony A5-Laser Analyzer at the Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core facility. Acquired data were analyzed with FlowJo v10.8 (FlowJo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Alveolar Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were stained with MitoTracker green (50 nM) for mitochondrial localization. Data was collected with a Becton Dickinson LSR-II flow cytometer using FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and further analyzed with FlowJo software (version 8.5.2; TreeStar). BAL cells were blocked with 1% BSA containing TruStain fcX (anti-mouse CD16/32) antibody (101319; BioLegend), followed by staining with antibodies. Antibodies used: Rat anti-mouse CD45-PE (12-0451-82; eBiosciences), LIVE Dead-eflour506 (65-0866; Invitrogen), Rat anti-mouse CD11b-APC-Cy7 (101225; BioLegend), anti-mouse CD64-PE-Cy7 (139313; BioLegend), Rat anti-mouse Ly6G-AF700 (561236; BD), Rat anti-mouse Siglec F-APC (155507; BioLegend), Rat anti-mouse Ly6C: eflour450 (48-5932-82; Invitrogen), Rat anti-mouse MHC II-PerCP-Cy5.5 (562363; BD), and Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Annexin V FITC and PI (V13242, Molecular Probes). Hierarchical gating strategy was used to represent the resident alveolar macrophages as CD45+CD11b+/−Ly6GCD64+Ly6cSiglec Fhi and monocyte-derived macrophages as CD45+CD11b+/−Ly6GCD64+Ly6cSiglec Flow. Data was acquired on FACSAria II or LSR II (BD Biosciences) using BD FACS Diva software (version 8.0.1). Data was analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC) software (Version 10.5.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!