The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Powerup sybr

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

PowerUp SYBR is a real-time PCR reagent that enables sensitive and reliable detection of DNA targets. It contains a proprietary dye that binds to double-stranded DNA, providing a fluorescent signal for quantification.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using powerup sybr

1

ChIP-qPCR Analysis of AR Transcriptional Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
22Rv1 and C4–2 cells were plated in hormone-deficient media for 72 hours. Following which, cells were treated with vehicle (0nM) or CCS1477 500nM for 5 hours, followed by the addition of 10nM dihydrotestosterone for 3 hours. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as previously described (61 (link)). Briefly, cells were cross-linked with 1% fresh formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature. Chromatin was sheared to 200–700bp using Diagenode Ultrasonicator for 30 cycles. Lysates were incubated with CBP or p300 custom antibody, or AR-FL antibody (Millipore, 06–680). ChIP DNA was extracted via phenol-chloroform method and qPCR was performed using PowerUP SYBR (ThermoFisher). Genes selected for ChIP-qPCR were prioritized based on statistically significant transcriptional downregulation after CCS1477 treatment (1.5 fold change; p=<0.05) and known AR regulation: KLK3, TMPRSS2, FKBP5, ANKRD30B, CHRNA2 (with TFF1 and TGFA representing known CBP binding sites) (48 (link), 49 (link)). Primers were designed at AR target genes using previously described AR binding sites and are listed in Supplementary Table 15 (62 (link)–64 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted by homogenizing tissue or cells in TRIzol and then purified using Micro Direct-zol Purification kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Zymo Research Corporation). RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCRs were run either in duplicates or in triplicates on a CFX Connect qPCR system using PowerUp SYBR (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gene expression was determined using the ∆∆Ct method (60 (link)) and normalized to mean of Ct values of Hprt1 housekeeping genes. Data are presented as average fold change relative to controls. Primers for specific genes are listed in table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing NIPBL and WAPL Expression in HCT116 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 derived RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plus Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, a 50μl reaction containing 20μl RNA, 1500pmol Oligo dT primer (IDT), 1.6mM dNTPs, 1x RT Buffer (Thermo Scientific), 0.5μl RNase OUT (Invitrogen), and 0.7μl Maxima RT (Thermo Scientific) was incubated at 50°C for two hours then at 85°C for 5 min. Samples were stored at -20°C until use. RT-PCR was performed using PowerUP Sybr (ThermoFisher, #A25741) based on manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cDNA was diluted to a working concentration of 6μg and HCT116 genomic DNA (gDNA) was diluted in a 1:10 serial dilution. A 6μl reaction was prepared per well, with 1x PowerUP Sybr and 0.2μM of the forward and reverse primers and combined with 4μl diluted DNA. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. qPCR was performed on the QuantStudio7 Flex System. YWHAZ and TBP were used as reference control genes. The sequences of oligonucleotides used for qPCR are: NIPBL forward primer: 5’-TCTCTTTGTTACTTGTCTGTTTCC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-ATGTTTTGCTTTGAAAACCAGTG-3’; WAPL forward primer 5’-GAACTAAAACAGCTCCATCACC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-CACACTTTCAGGCACACCAG-3’; YWHAZ forward primer 5’-CCCGTTTCCGAGCCATAAAAG-3’ and reverse primer 5’-TTTGGCCTTCTGAACCAGCTC-3’; and TBP forward primer 5’-ACAGCTCTTCCACTCACAGAC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-ATGGGGGAGGGATACAGTGG-3’.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Amygdalar Gene Expression Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qPCR was performed as previously described [25 (link), 26 (link)]. RNA was extracted by homogenizing amygdala tissue in Trizol and then purified using Micro Direct-zol Purification kit following manufacturer’s instructions (Zymo). RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific) following manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR reactions were run on a CFX-Connect qPCR system using Powerup SYBR (Thermo Scientific). Changes in expression were determined using the ∆∆Ct method and normalized to mean of Ct values of the Hprt1 housekeeping gene. Data are presented as average fold change relative to controls. Primer sequences have been previously published [26 (link), 33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptional Profiling of Autonomic Ganglia in Asthmatic Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carotid bodies, petrosal ganglia, superior cervical ganglia and nodose ganglia were taken from asthmatic and naïve BN rats (n = 6 ganglia of each type were pooled to increase RNA yield) 3 h after their last aerosol challenge. Total RNA (200 ng confirmed with NanoDrop; Thermo Scientific) was converted to cDNA. PCR amplification was carried out in triplicate (20 μl—1μl mRNA, 7 μl ddH2O, 1 μL primer/each, and 10 μL Powerup SYBR; ThermoScientific) 50 °C/2 min, 95 °C/2 min followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C/3 s, 60 °C/30 s and melt curve (0.1 °C/s; 60-95 °C; QuantStudio 3, Applied Biosystems). Custom primer sequences are listed in Table 1 (Integrated DNA Technologies). Comparisons were made using 2∆ctt with hypoxyribosyltransferase (HPRT) as housekeeping gene [17 (link)].

Primer sequences (rat tissue)

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded 50,000/well in a 24 well culture plate and treated as described above. After treatment, media was removed and cells were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) then scraped off the plate in 150 μL QIAzol Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; #79306). Three wells receiving the same treatment were combined and lysed in a bead homogenizer. RNA was isolated using an ethanol precipitation on a RNA elution column (Enzymax, Lexington, KY, USA; #EZCR101). RNA was then reverse transcribed with a qScript cDNA synthesis kit (Quanta Biosciences, Beverly, MA; 101414–106) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Relative gene expression was measured using PowerUp SYBR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA; #A25778) in a QuantStudio 3 real time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The geometric mean of three housekeeping genes (RER1, VCP, and EMC7) was used as an endogenous control. Expression was quantified using the 2ΔΔ-Ct method. Values were normalized to the CTL for each respective treatment and reported as fold change. Primers were purchased through Integrated DNA Technologies and primer sequences used in this study are listed in Table. A.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from the cells using a FastGene™ RNA Basic Kit (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan) and reverse‐transcribed into cDNA using the High‐Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The SYBR green‐based quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed using PowerUp SYBR (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the QuantStudio 3 Real‐Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific). Relative quantification was performed by the ΔCT method using TBP as the housekeeping gene for normalization. Primer sequences are shown in into Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells and tissues by using the RNeasy Mini kit or the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Montréal, Québec, Canada), respectively, and stored at −80 °C. Reverse transcription was performed with the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) or the Superscript VILO Kit (Invitrogen), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Gene expression was analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) with SYBR Green chemistry (PowerUp SYBR, ThermoFisher Scientific) on a QuantStudio 6 Real-Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All quantitative PCR results were expressed as relative gene expression (rel. exp.), which is the gene of interest normalized to the housekeeping gene, Hprt, by using the 2−ΔC(t) method [19 (link),22 ,33 (link)]. For a complete list of primers and their respective sequences, please see Supplemental Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Validating Candidate Genes via qRTPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the candidate genes identified in our high-throughput transcriptomic study, total RNA from the inguinal mammary gland was reverse transcribed to cDNA (Biorad iScript cDNA synthesis kit, Hercules, CA), and amplified using quantitative PCR (qRTPCR). Primer sequences for qRTPCR were obtained from Primer bank (Supplementary Table 1) [40 (link)–42 (link)], and primers were synthesized by IDT DNA (Coralville, IA). PowerUP SYBR from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) was used to amplify the target genes. Livak’s fold change [43 (link)] was estimated relative to 18S RNA as the house-keeping gene. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc analysis was performed to compare the relative expression between different groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mitochondrial Oxidation and Mitophagy Genes Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of total RNA was performed using Qiagen tissue extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Then, cDNA was obtained using high-capacity cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA). qRT-PCR was carried out using power-up SYBR (Applied Biosystems) utilizing an ABI 7500 RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR primer pair sequences are shown in Table 1. Relative expression of the studied mitochondrial oxidation genes, including manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and uncoupling protein-2 (UCP2), was determined. Moreover, mitophagy-related genes, including phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK 1), Parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (Parkin), FUN14 domain-containing 1 (FUNDC1), unc-51-like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1), B-cell lymphoma 2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) genes, were normalized to the expression level of β-actin gene. The relative quantification was then calculated by the expression 2−ΔΔCt.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!