The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using anti tlr2

1

Evaluating Skin Barrier Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dorsal skin tissue was lysed in RIPA lysis and extraction buffer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete™; Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Anti-aquaporin 3, anti-TSLP (all from Abcam), anti-filaggrin, anti-cytokeratin 14, anti-p-extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK), anti-ERK, anti-p-AKT, anti-AKT (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-TLR2, anti-MyD88, anti-TRAF6 (all from Invitrogen), and anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) antibodies were used. Western blot analysis was performed according to a previously published method [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Modulating MDSC Antifungal Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BM-MDSCs obtained from C57BL/6 WT animals were treated or not with 200 μM 1-methyl tryptophan (1MT, Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequently, 2 × 105 BM-MDSCs were seeded per well in a 96-well U-bottom plate, treated or not with 1MT overnight, and then challenged with 4 × 103P. brasiliensis yeasts. In complementary experiments, BM-MDSCs were treated or not with 10 μg/mL of anti-Dectin-1 (Thermo Fisher), anti-TLR2, or anti-TLR4 (Invitrogen). A monoclonal IgG2b (BioxCell) was used as an isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

TLR2 Expression on CD4+ T Cells in RRMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analyses were carried out using frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from RRMS patients collected during relapse and remission. After thawing, the cells were cultured for 5 h (short-term stimulation) with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (0.1 µg/ml), ionomycin (1 µg/ml), and Brefeldin-A (10 µg/ml, added only in the last hour). After stimulation and washing, cells were stained with Live/Dead® Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then stained extracellularly with anti-CD4 (BD Pharmingen) and anti-TLR2 (eBioscience, Clone TL2.1). Cells were acquired using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), collecting a minimum of 50,000 events in each sample, and analyzed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter, version 1.5). Gating strategy ungated PBMCs were plotted on SSC/FSC plot and then lymphocytes were gated by excluding dead cells/debris. Then, from the lymphocytes, live cells were gated. Then, the percentage of live lymphocytes that were CD4+/TLR2+ were selected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histone-Induced Leukocyte Adhesion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hEC were incubated with or without 50 μg/mL histone for 5 h. U937 cells (1×106 cells/mL) were added onto the hEC layer for 30 min. The non-adherent cells were collected. The adherent round U937 cells were enumerated under a light microscope (Olympus).
For neutralizing histone, histone was pre-mixed with 62.5 μg/mL polysialic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h, 100 U/mL heparin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, and 100 nM activated protein C (APC; Haematologic Technologies Inc., Essex Junction, VA) for 30 min. The mixtures were then added to hEC.
Anti-E-selectin antibody (50 μg/mL), anti-ICAM-1 antibody (10 μg/mL), or anti-VCAM-1 antibody (30 μg/mL) (all from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was incubated with histone–treated hEC for 10 min. Then U937 cells were added.
Before stimulated with histone, hEC were pre-treated for 1 h with 50 μg/mL isotype-IgG2a, anti-TLR2, or anti-TLR4 antibody (all from eBioscience), or 5 μM TLR9 antagonist (ODN TTAGGG; InvivoGen, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Blocking Immune Receptors in HIV T-cell Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TLR and MHC-II blockades, PBMC was pre-treated with 10 μg of either anti-TLR-2 (eBioscience), TLR-4 (eBioscience) or MHC-II (eBioscience) blocking antibodies for 30 min. PBMC were then stimulated with FBCs from 10 HIV + ART-MSM subjects for 4 days and T cell activation was enumerated. For cytokine blockades, PBMC were treated with 10 μg of anti-TNF-α (eBioscience), IFN-γ (eBioscience) or IL-6 (eBioscience) monoclonal antibodies, then stimulated with FBCs and T cell activation was enumerated as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PBMC Isolation and Fungal Stimulation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human PBMCs were isolated by density centrifugation using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) as described (Endres et al., 1988 (link)). For stimulation experiments, the interactions were performed in round-bottom 96-well microplates with 100 μL of cells adjusted to 5 × 105 PBMCs in RPMI 1640 Dutch modification (added with 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mM pyruvate and 0.05 mg/mL gentamycin; all reagents from Sigma) and 100 μL with 1 × 105 fungal cells freshly harvested or treated. The interactions were incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% (v/v) CO2. In some experiments, PBMCs were preincubated for 1 h at 37°C with either laminarin (200 μg/mL), anti-TLR2 (10 μg/mL, eBioscience, Cat. No. 16-9922) or antibodies to TLR4 (10 μg/mL, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat. No. sc-293072) prior to stimulation with Candida cells. Isotype matched, irrelevant antibodies, IgG2aκ (10 μg/mL, eBioscience, Cat. No. 14-4724-85) and IgG1(10 μg/mL, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat. No. sc-52003) were used as controls for experiments assessing TLR2 and TLR4, respectively. All reagents used for the pre-incubation experiments were negative to contamination with LPS (tested with the Limulus amebocyte lysate from Sigma), and all reactions were performed in presence of 5 μ g/mL polymyxin B (Sigma) (Schwartz et al., 1972 (link)). Plates were centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 × g at 4°C, the supernatant saved and kept at −20°C until used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunocytochemistry Staining of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry was undertaken as reported previously 24 (link) using Vectastain ABC Universal kit (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK). Cells on coverslips were thawed, hydrated and endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched in 0·3% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min. Coverslips were incubated with the following primary antibodies (for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C): anti-BerEP4 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-α-smooth muscle actin (abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-vimentin (abcam), anti-desmin (abcam), anti-TLR-2 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-TLR-4 (eBioscience) or anti-TLR-5 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Following incubation with biotinylated secondary antibody and avidin–biotin complex, peroxidase activity was developed with diaminobenzidene (DAB) solution as per the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface staining was performed for 15 min using standard methods. Briefly, 100–200 ul whole blood was mixed with 0.5–1 ul mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Next, erythrocytes were hemolyzed using a Becton Dickinson fluorescence activated cell sorter (BD FACS) lysing solution for 10 min. The leukocytes were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and finally resuspended in CellFIX solution. Antibodies used were anti-CD11C (eBioscience), anti-HLA-DR(eBioscience), anti-TLR4 (eBioscience), anti-TLR2 (eBioscience), and anti-TLR9 (eBioscience). At least 50 000 cells per sample were counted. DCs were characterized on the basis of the CD11c expression. Flow cytometric analysis (50 000 events/sample) was performed on a FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and further analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Three Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluation of HP0459 Recognition Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibody blocking assays were performed to investigate the recognition receptor of HP0459 in RAW264.7 cells using the anti-TLR2 (eBioscience) and anti-TLR4 (BioLegend) antibodies. Briefly, RAW264.7 cells were pretreated using 8 μg of anti-TLR2 and anti-TLR4 antibody for 30 min respectively and then incubated with 10 μg ml-1 HP0459 for 10 h. The expression levels of various cytokines were determined by ELISA. According to the conditions of cytokine activation, the recognition receptor of the HP0459 was analyzed. In addition, TLR2-/- macrophages were isolated from TLR2-/- mice to verify the results of the blocking assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disaggregated crypt epithelial cells (106) or colonic myofibroblasts were washed in PBS and incubated in CelLytic M reagent (Sigma) supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (Sigma) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The lysate was centrifuged at 10 000 g and the protein-containing supernatant was stored at −80°C until required.
Aliquots of total protein, mixed in a 1:1 ratio with Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) before transfer to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).
The PVDF membrane was incubated (at 4°C) overnight with or without the following antibodies: anti-β-actin (Sigma), anti-TLR-2 (eBioscience) and anti-TLR-4 (abcam). Immunostaining was performed using a Vectastain ABC Universal kit (Vector Laboratories), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!