The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Liquid chromatography system

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Japan, United States

The Liquid chromatography system is an analytical instrument used to separate, identify, and quantify components in a liquid sample. It consists of a mobile phase pump, an injector, a separation column, and a detector. The system is designed to provide accurate and reliable results for a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using liquid chromatography system

1

Quantification of Luteolin and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the plasma level of luteolin and its metabolites, a 10 μL sample of the extract was subjected to an HPLC–MS/MS system consisting of a liquid chromatography system (Agilent, Tokyo, Japan) and a 4000 QTRAP HPLC–MS/MS (SCIEX, Tokyo, Japan), with analytical parameters that were similar to our previous study11 (link),12 (link). Chromatographic separation of luteolin and its metabolites were done on a C18 column (CAPCELLPAK C18 MGII S3, 4.6 × 150 mm; Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and temperature maintained at 40 °C. Gradient elution was performed using water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B). The gradient profile was as follows: 0–20 min, 10–30% B linear; 20–25 min, 30–50% B linear. The mobile phase was split so that the eluate entered the HPLC–MS/MS system at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Luteolin, luteolin-3'G, luteolin-4'G, and luteolin-7G were analyzed in negative ion mode and detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for the transition of precursor ions to productions: luteolin (m/z 284 > 133), luteolin-3'G (m/z 461 > 285), luteolin-4'G (m/z 461 > 285), and luteolin-7G (m/z 461 > 285).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC was performed with an Agilent liquid chromatography system, consisting of UV-VIS Spectra-Focus detector (220 nm) and injector-auto sampler. Sample (10 mg/ml) were filtered through a 0.45 μm PVDF-filter and injected in to the HPLC column. The injection volume was 10 μl and the column was 20RBAX ECLIPSE, XDB-C18, (5 μm; 4.6 × 150 mm, Agilent USA). The method involved the use of a binary gradient with mobile phases containing: solvent A (0.05% trifluoroacetic acid) and solvent B (0.038% trifluoroacetic acid in 83% acetonitrile (v/v) with the following gradient: 0–5 min, 15% B in A, 5–10 min, 50% B in A, 10–15 min, 70% B in A. The flow rate was kept constant at 1 ml/min. Identifications were based on retention times in comparison with authentic standards. The crude extract was partitioned three times with 25% hydrochloric acid and methanol. The percolate was concentrated in a rotary evaporator and dissolved in HPLC grade methanol. Calibration curves for standard analytes at 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 μg/ml concentrations were found to be linear (Supplementary File 1). Quantification of each constituent was completed by means of integration of peaks using the external standard scheme.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEC-MALS Analysis of Caseinates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In selected experiments, molar mass of polymeric fractions was determined. For this, the same procedure as in Section 3.4.2 was applied using a different equipment. The SEC column was coupled to a liquid chromatography system from Agilent Technologies, Inc.
(Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the eluting caseinate was detected by UV/Vis (λ = 280 nm;
Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), dRI (λ = 633 nm; Optilab T-rEx, Wyatt
Technology Europe GmbH, Dernbach, Germany), and MALS detectors (λ = 633.8 nm, 18 angles; Dawn Heleos II; Wyatt Technology Europe GmbH, Dernbach, Germany). Data was acquired and evaluated using Astra (v6.1; Wyatt Technology Europe GmbH, Dernbach, Germany), and molar mass was calculated with a 1 st order Berry fit using either dRI (dn•dc -1 = 0.186 mL•g -1 ; de Kruif & Grinberg, 2002; Monogioudi et al., 2009) or UV signal (ε = 0.85 mL•mg -1 ; Thomar et al., 2013) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!