The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rstudio version 2022.07.1

Manufactured by Posit
Sourced in Austria

RStudio is a free and open-source integrated development environment (IDE) for the R programming language. It provides a user-friendly interface for writing, running, and debugging R code. RStudio supports various features such as code editing, visualization, package management, and project management. It is designed to enhance the productivity and efficiency of R users.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using rstudio version 2022.07.1

1

Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-sample t-tests were used to compare continuous variables (PROs and ROM). Categorical variables displayed as proportions were compared with Chi-squared tests. These variables include demographic characteristics, cuff integrity, surgery-related factors, concomitant procedures, need for revision, and clinically significant measures. Data analysis was performed on the basis of patient availability for each variable, regardless of whether the total number of patients was reached. P values under .05 were considered statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors affecting satisfaction by inputting significant variables derived from univariate analysis using the stepwise forward method. All analyses were performed with R (version 4.2.1) and RStudio (version 2022.07.1) software. A power analysis was performed for satisfaction rate, based on a binary question, resulting in a minimum sample size of 73 patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prostate Cancer Treatment Outcomes Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were described with absolute number and corresponding percentage; continuous variables using mean with standard deviation (SD), and median with range. Statistical comparisons of categorical variables between groups were performed using the Chi square test. Continuous variables were compared using Welsh´s Test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test based on the underlying distribution evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test [17] (link). Comparisons of pre-and post-operative EPIC-26-Scores were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Dichotomous outcomes were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Variables were considered for inclusion in the multivariable model based on their literature-based relevance as potential confounders and based on statistical significance (P < 0.1) from univariate logistic regression analyses and retained in the final multivariable model if P < 0.05. The final multivariable logistic regression model was assessed for goodness of fit (calibration) with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test [18] and for discrimination with the area under the curve statistic. All statistical analyses were performed with R version 4.2.1 (R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria) and RStudio version 2022.07.1 (RStudio Inc., Boston, MA). Statistical tests with P < 0.05 were considered significant. All P-values are two-sided.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!