The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

175 protocols using ab81289

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of VEGF and α-SMA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sections were stained by IHC staining to detect the expression of factors in the VEGF family and α-SMA. After the antigen was repaired, primary antibodies were added at 4°C overnight, and then secondary antibodies were added at room temperature for 1 h, avoiding light. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used for staining, and neutral gum was used to seal pieces. The antibodies were anti-VEGFA (1:1000, ab81289, Abcam, United States), anti-VEGFB (1:1000, ab81289, Abcam, United States), anti-VEGFC (1:1000, ab81289, Abcam, United States), and α-SMA (1:1000, 14395-1-AP, Proteintech, United States) (n = 4 each group). The Image J software was used for assessing the mean optical density.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Lung Tissues and HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For lung tissues, frozen lung sections were used. For HUVECs, cells cultured on glass coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. Frozen lung sections or cells permeabilized in PBS with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. Blocked as above, and then incubated with anti-FGF18 antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-393,471), anti-p65 antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-8008), anti-ICAM-1 antibody (Affinity, DF7413), anti-VCAM-1 antibody (Affinity, DF6082), anti-CD34 (Abcam, ab81289), anti-Aquaporin 5 (Abcam, ab78486), anti-Prosurfactant Protein C (Abcam, ab211326), anti-CD34 (Abcam, ab81289), anti-VE-cadherin (Abcam, ab33168), anti-F4/80 (CST, 30,325 S), anti-CD3 (Proteintech, 17617-1-AP) at 4℃ overnight. And then it was incubated with a secondary antibody of Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:200) (Abcam, ab150113) or Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:200) (Abcam, ab150075). Finally, the nuclei were stained with DAPI. Images were captured with a Nikon C2si Confocal microscope (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of BMMSCs and EPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMMSCs from passage two were suspended in 400 μl of PBS and incubated with each specific antibody. To evaluate surface markers, phycoerythrin (PE)-coupled antibodies against CD29 (25-0291-80, eBioscience, USA), rabbit anti-CD34 (ab81289, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit anti-CD45 (ab10558, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-CD90 (ab225, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and mouse anti-CD105 (ab11411, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used. The secondary antibodies used in the present study included Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgG (Zhuangzhi Co. Ltd, Xi’an, China). After incubation in the dark, the cells were washed with PBS and then resuspended in 400 μl of PBS. Cell fluorescence was determined using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
Primary EPCs were suspended in 400 μl of PBS and incubated with each specific antibody. Rabbit anti-CD34 (ab81289, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit anti-CD133 (ab19898, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and rabbit anti-VEGFR2 (ab2349, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used to identify surface markers. The secondary antibodies used in the present study included Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Zhuangzhi Co. Ltd, Xi’an, China). After incubation at 4 °C in the dark, the cells were washed with PBS and then resuspended in 400 μl of PBS. Cell fluorescence was determined using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CCDC34, VEGF, and CD34

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CCDC34 and VEGF levels and the presence of CD34 were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The experimental method is a 2-step method. First, sections were first dewaxed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), then incubated in 10 mmol/l pH 6.0 citrate buffer, heated in a microwave oven, and incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min at room temperature. Second, sections were incubated with primary antibodies (CCDC34 antibody [ab122396; Abcam Inc, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China], VEGF antibody [ab2349; Abcam Inc, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China], and CD34 antibody [ab81289; Abcam Inc, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China]), all at a dilution of 1: 100 at 4°C overnight. We removed the humidified chamber with sides from the freezer, equilibrated it to room temperature for 45 min, and then absorbed the surplus primary antibody. the sides were incubated at room temperature for 30 min with the appropriate secondary antibody (Envision+HRP, Rabbit, DAKO). Finally, sections were colored through reacting with 3.3-diaminobenzidine. Hematoxylin was applied as counterstain, and negative-control sections were processed with PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemistry of Maxillary Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Maxillae were dissected and fixed in 4% PFA overnight. Samples were decalcified in 19% EDTA until soft enough to cut (~7 days). Processed samples were then dehydrated with 30% sucrose followed by embedding in OCT on dry ice with ethanol. Cryosections were fixed by 4% PFA. Sections were then subject to permeabilisation by 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma, X100), heat-induced antigen retrieval, and blocking with 3% BSA. Sections were stained by the following antibodies: anti-RFP (Abcam, Ab62341), anti-CD34 (Abcam, Ab81289 and Ab8158), anti-CD31 (Abcam, Ab7388 and Ab24590), anti-GFP (Abcam, Ab13970), anti-Arg1 (Abcam, Ab92274), anti-Met (Abcam, Ab51067), anti-HGF (Abcam, Ab83760), and anti-Ki67 (Abcam, Ab16667). Secondary antibodies included Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A11039), Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen, A11077), Alexa Fluor 633 (Invitrogen, A21052), and Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A11008). Tyramide signal amplification (NEL744001KT, PerkinElmer) was performed for weak signals. Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen 62249, 1:500) was used for DNA staining. Slides were mounted using Citifluor AF1 (EMS, 171024-AF1) and cover-slipped for microscopy. Zeiss Apotome or Leica TCS SP5 systems was used for acquiring images. ImageJ and Adobe Photoshop were used for image processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Endothelial Progenitor Cell Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Ethics Committee of Fudan University. Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for EPC isolation. Bone marrow was isolated from the femur and tibia of the rats and then subjected to density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll (Sigma-Aldrich, #10771). Then, mononuclear cells were cultured on collagen I-coated dishes with EGM-2 medium (Lonza, #CC-3202) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. After 3 days of incubation, the medium was changed every 3 days. When the cells had reached the second generation, the cells were stained with Dil (Sigma-Aldrich, #42364) and UEA (Sigma-Aldrich, #L9006). Laser confocal microscopy was used for observation of Dil and UEA staining.
The mononuclear cells in the peripheral blood were isolated by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation at 10, 20, or 30 days after the aneurysm model was established. CD34 (Abcam, #ab81289) and KDR (Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, VEGFR-2) (Abcam, #ab9530) monoclonal antibodies were incubated with the mononuclear cells for 1 h on ice and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 546- (ThermoFisher, #A10036) and Alexa Fluor 488-(ThermoFisher, #A11008) labeled fluorescent secondary antibodies for 30 min. The proportion of CD34+/KDR+ cells was analyzed by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, DxFLEX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Xenograft Tumor Immunofluorescence Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sections from xenograft tumors were stained with a primary antibody mixture containing a mouse anti-human CK8/18 (Catalog number ZM-0315, 1:200 dilution, ZSGB-BIO, China) and a rabbit anti-mouse CD34 (Catalog number ab81289, 1:300 dilution, Abcam, China) at 4°C overnight. Then, a secondary antibody mixture containing a goat anti-rabbit IgG labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 and a goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with TRITC was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Finally, Nuclei were stained by DAPI (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) for 5 min. The slides was mounted with antiquench mounting medium and subjected to observation by fluorenscence microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Ovarian Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining of CD34 (ab81289, Abcam, UK), FSHR (orb213952, Biorbyt, UK), AMH (orb523061, Biorbyt, UK), PCNA (ab29, Abcam, UK), and caspase-3 (ab184787, Abcam, UK) was performed in D15 ovarian tissue. After fixation, the ovarian tissue was embedded into 4 nm thick sections, followed by dewaxing, rehydration, antigen retrieval, blocking, addition of the primary antibodies against CD34, FSHR, AMH, PCNA, and caspase-3, and counterstaining with the secondary antibody and hematoxylin. Finally, the images were collected under a microscopy system (Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan). CD34 staining was located in the ovarian stroma and corpus luteum. FSHR, AMH, PCNA, and caspase-3 were mainly located in the ovarian granulosa cells. Four fields of view were randomly selected for observation at 400x. CD34 was scored using MVD [29 (link)]. FSHR, AMH, PCNA, and caspase-3 were scored using the H score. According to the H score equation, H‐score∑Pi (i + 1), where i is the intensity staining (0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = medium, and 3 = strong). Pi is at each intensity (0–100%) percentage of stained cells. The H scores were measured in granulosa cells. The sections were independently scored by two pathologists. If there is a difference in the scores, reevaluate the slides and the two observers reached a consensus [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of hAMSCs by Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hAMSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Biosharp, China) for 20 min, and with permeabilized 0.1% Triton-X 100 (Sigma) for 15 min and were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Bosterbio) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-Integrin beta 1 (CD29) (ab134179, Abcam), anti-CD44 (ab189524, Abcam), anti-CD73 (ab133582, Abcam), anti-CD105 (ab231774, Abcam), anti-CD19 (ab134114, Abcam), anti-CD34 (ab81289, Abcam), anti-CD45 (ab40763, Abcam), anti-cytokeratin 7 (CK7) (ab181598, Abcam) and anti-cytokeratin 19 (CK19) (ab52625, Abcam) and then incubated with the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (ab150077, Abcam) for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark. The cell nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma) for 5 min. The results were observed by fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying IL-36α and VEGFA Expression in Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IHC staining was performed using microwave‐based antigen retrieval and the avidin–biotin complex method. The sections were stained with rabbit anti‐(human IL‐36α) IgG (ab180909, 1 : 1000 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), rabbit anti‐(human CD34) IgG (ab81289, 1 : 1000 dilution; Abcam) or mouse anti‐(human vascular endothelial growth factor A) (VEGFA) IgG1 (ab1316, 1 : 1000 dilution; Abcam), followed by horseradish peroxidase‐labeled anti‐rabbit or anti‐mouse IgG. The sections were visualized by light microscopy using 3, 3‐diaminobenzidine.
The staining patterns of IL‐36α and VEGFA were scored based on the intensity and the percentage of positively stained cells. The intensity of the staining was scored as follows: 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining) and 3 (strong staining), respectively. The staining extent was scored as follows: 0 (<10%), 1 (10–25%), 2 (25–50%) and 3 (>50%). The final score was calculated using the percentage of positive cells × staining intensity, ranging between 0 and 9. Total score ≥4 was defined as high expression, and a score of 0–3 was defined as low expression. Microvessel density (MVD) was recorded by counting CD34‐positive endothelial cells [15].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!