The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using cd163

1

Cell Surface Marker Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the cell surface expression of CD47, HER2, EGFR, and CD20, cells were stained with conjugated primary antibodies (BD Biosciences) for 30 minutes at 4°C, washed, and resuspended in staining buffer. Macrophages were incubated with anti-CD16/32 (BD Biosciences) for 15 minutes at room temperature to block nonspecific binding and stained with CD14, CD68, CD80, CD163, CD206, PD-L1, and HLA-DR (BD Biosciences). Cells were acquired using a BD LSR X-20, and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical and Immunofluorescence Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detailed procedures of immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analyses have been described previously34 (link). Protein expression was detected in OCI-Ly3 xenograft tissue sections with antibodies against F4/80 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), CD206 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD31 (BD Biosciences), collagen I (Abcam), and legumain (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Specimens from DLBCL patients were fixed and immunohistochemically stained for CD163 (BD Biosciences). Images were captured by an IX51 research microscope. (Olympus)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Myeloid Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of surface markers was analyzed using Abs specific for human CD206, CD163, and CD45 (all purchased from BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA). Corresponding fluorescence label-conjugated isotype controls were utilized in all experiments. In brief, cells were washed once in room temperature flow buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.05% NaN3), once in ice-cold flow buffer and cell staining was performed on ice. Samples were analyzed using a BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FloJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Macrophage Characterization by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophage purity, differentiation and Tie2 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (FACS Canto Flow Cytometer, BD Biosciences). Fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies against CD16 (clone 61D3, eBiosciences), CD64 (Biolegend), CD163, CD200R (both from BD Pharmingen) and Tie2 (R&D Systems), and equivalent concentrations of isotype control antibodies, were used. Before staining, Fc receptors were blocked with 10% human serum (Lonza). Data were analyzed with Flow Jo Flow Cytometry Analysis software (Tree Star). Values were expressed as the ratio of the geometric mean fluorescence intensity (geomean) of the marker of interest over that of the isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tumor Immune Microenvironment Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor specimens with adjacent tissues, relevant internal organs and inguinal sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were harvested and fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin solution for paraffin sectioning and staining. Immunohistochemical test for in situ detection were performed with anti-MUC-1 (BD), CD49b/NK1.1 (Biolegend), anti-CD4, CD8, CD25, Foxp3, β-catenin, TERT (all abcam), and anti-CD44, CD133 (all Chemicon) monoclonal antibody severally. Imaging of thymic lobules for renewal hotspots were captured using Leica scanning confocal microscope. Thymic and tumor tissue/cells were stained with thymosin-α1(abcam)/-β4(Millipore) for immunofluorescence or with TCRαβ, TCRγδ, CD3, CD38, CD80, CD163, CD45RA (all BD) for positive subsets via FACS-Aria III cell sorting system. Successive subsets were incubated with 3D-CSC-subsets from in vivo tumor at a ratio of 120:1 (thymocyte: spheroid) in DMEM/F12 with 2% normal serum for over 72 hours of reactivity between renovated T-subsets and CSC pool.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Profiling of M1 and M2 Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was conducted on deparaffinized and rehydrated slides with primary antibodies against the M1 markers CCR-7 (1:500, BD Pharmingen) and CD11c (1:400, BD Pharmingen) and the M2 marker CD163 (1:500, BD Pharmingen). The stained slides were imaged using a light microscope (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Macrophage Subtypes by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment, macrophages were collected for flow cytometry analysis. The cells were stained for macrophage surface markers to detect potential subtype alterations. The macrophage markers used were: CD68 (333809, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) as a general macrophage marker, CD80 (305213, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) as an M1 macrophage marker, and CD163 (555749, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and CD206 (321119, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) as M2 macrophage markers. To exclude non-viable cells on this panel, 7-AAD marker (420403, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) was used. Staining was done on ice with 30 min incubation time. At least 10,000 gated single cells were recorded. The instrument used was an LSR-II FACS from BD and the data analysis was done in FlowJo (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Myeloid Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of surface markers was analyzed using Abs specific for human CD206, CD163, and CD45 (all purchased from BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA). Corresponding fluorescence label-conjugated isotype controls were utilized in all experiments. In brief, cells were washed once in room temperature flow buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.05% NaN3), once in ice-cold flow buffer and cell staining was performed on ice. Samples were analyzed using a BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FloJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenotyping Macrophage Subsets by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using standardized flow cytometry protocols as described previously gmMφ and mMφ were phenotyped using antibodies against CD14, CD163 (both BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) and MHC-II DR/DP (clone Q1514) [23] (link). FcγR expression was determined with antibodies against FcγRI (CD64, PE labeled, clone 10.1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), FcγRIII (CD16, PE labeled, clone DJ130c; Dako), clone IV.3 which preferentially binds to FcγRIIa (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) and the FcγRIIb specific antibody 2B6 (Alexa488 labeled; MacroGenics, Rockville, Maryland, USA). Expression of unlabeled markers was visualized via a FITC labeled goat-anti-mouse secondary antibody. Cell fluorescence was measured on a FACS Calibur (BD) and analyzed using Flowjo software for the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and the proportion of positive cells relative to cells stained with the appropriate IgG isotypes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-human CD66bFITC, CD3, CD19, CD14, CD163,CD138, CD56, CD15 all PE conjugated, HLADRV450, CD45V500, CD16APC-H7, CD14PE-Cy7, CD38PE-Cy7, CD 206APC were obtained (BD Pharmingen, Stockholm, Sweden). CD34PE, CD235aPE, CD11bPerCp-eFlour710 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD192APC, and CX3CR1AlexaFlour647 were from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA. Human FcReceptor binding inhibitor, 7AAD, and Annexin V-Alexa647, were obtained from eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA, Sigma–Aldrich, (St. Louis, MO, USA), and Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!