The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using snap surface 647

1

E. coli RNAP Fluorescent Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. coli core RNAP (α2ββ′ω) with a SNAP-tag on the C-terminus of β′ (Tetone et al., 2017 (link)) was labeled with SNAP-Surface 647 (New England Biolabs) as described (Mumm et al., 2020 (link)) to produce RNAP647. Labeling stoichiometry measured as in Mumm et al. (2020) (link) was 54%. RNAP488-PEG-biotin was prepared in the same way, except that BG-488-PEG-biotin was used and unreacted dye was removed using a 30 kDa MWCO centrifugal filter (Microcon MRCF0R030; EMD Millipore); labeled protein was subjected to two cycles in which the protein was concentrated ~4 fold and then re-diluted to its original volume. To prepare σ70RNAP647 or σ70RNAP488-PEG-biotin, labeled core RNAP was incubated with σ70 as described (Harden et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Labeling Efficiency Calculation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CLIP and SNAP tagged proteins were labeled using CLIP Surface-647 and SNAP Surface-647 dyes (New England Bio Labs), respectively. Purified protein at a concentration of 2 mg/ mL was incubated with 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 4x molar excess of dye at room temperature for 5 min, and then on ice overnight. Unlabeled dye was removed through dialysis in a Mini Dialysis Kit, 8 kDa cut-off (Cytiva) for 4 hours at 4°C, in buffer containing 50 mM phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 30% sucrose, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, followed by multiple rounds of concentration and dilution through an Amicon Ultra 0.5 mL concentrator (Sigma-Aldrich). Labeling efficiency was calculated by measuring absorbance at 280 nm and 650 nm (A280 and A650) and using extinction coefficients of protein and dye (ε280 and ε650 ), as
%labeling efficiency = 100x(A650ε650)(A280ε280)
The labeling efficiency for the proteins used in TIRF assays were Alexa 647-labeled Kif4A: 47%; Alexa 647-labeled PRC1: 17% and Alexa 647-labeled EB3: 45%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neurotrophic Factor Receptor Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells (ATCC, mycoplasma negative) were transfected with a combination of 0.125 µg trkB/trkA/trkC in pcDNA plasmid and 0.125 µg p75NTR (all gifts from Moses Chao, Addgene plasmid #24088, #24089, #24093, and #24091, respectively) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, 11668-019) in a medium containing DMEM (Gibco, 41966-029), 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Before labeling, cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 1 h. Aliquot of 0.1 µM BDNFSNAP was coupled to 0.3 µM of SNAP-surface 647 (New England Biolabs, S9136S) for 1 h at 37 °C and applied onto cells for 15 min at 4 °C and imaged using a Zeiss AxioObserver A1 microscope.
DRG from TrkBCreERT2::RFP mice was collected in PBS and incubated in 1 mg/ml collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich, C5138) and 0.05% Trypsin (Gibco, 25300-054) for 25 min each at 37 °C. Cells were filtered and suspended in medium containing DMEM (Gibco, 41966-029), 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (PAA, A15101), 0.8% glucose, and 100 U of penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, 15140-122). Cells were plated on glass coverslips treated with poly-L-lysine and stored at 37 °C. An equimolar concentration of BDNFSNAP was coupled to a mixture of SNAP-Biotin (New England Biolabs, S9110S) and QD655 quantum dots (Invitrogen, Q10121MP) at 37 °C for 30 min. Cells were labeled with the above mixture for 5 min and imaged using a Zeiss AxioObserver A1 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

TR-FRET Receptor Clustering Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells stably or transiently expressing SNAP-GLP-1R were dual-labeled with the TR-FRET probe SNAP-Lumi4-Tb (40 nM, Cisbio) and SNAP-Surface 647 (1 μM, New England Biolabs) for 60 min at room temperature. These concentrations were selected because they provided optimum signal intensity at both measurement wavelengths. Where relevant, MβCD treatments were performed after labeling. Cells were washed and placed in HBSS in a white plate for a 10-min baseline measurement at 37 °C using a Spectramax i3x (Molecular Devices) plate reader fitted with a TR-FRET filter set (λEx = 335 nm, λEm = 616 nm and 665 nm, delay 30 μs, integration time 400 μs). TR-FRET was sequentially measured after agonist addition. The ratio of fluorescent signals at both emission wavelengths (665/616) was considered indicative of clustering because it reflects both transient and stable interactions between receptor protomers occurring within the long fluorescence lifetime of the excited terbium cryptate. Dose-response curves were constructed from AUC obtained from kinetic traces at different agonist concentrations and fitted to 4-parameter logistic curves to calculate potency (log EC50) and efficacy (Emax) values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification and Labeling of Actin-Associated Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fission yeast fimbrin SpFim1 was purified as described [38 (link)]. Human α-actinin-4, C. elegans α-actinin, SNAP-espin-2B was expressed in bacteria E. coli BL21-Codon Plus(DE3)-RP (Stratagene) cells and purified with affinity chromatography. Actin was purified from rabbit muscle acetone powder (Pel Freez Biologicals) and labeled on Cys374 with Oregon green (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) as described [39 (link), 40 (link)]. Mouse capping protein, human fascin 1 and human profilin HPRO1 were expressed in bacteria and purified as described [41 (link)–43 (link)]. Arp2/3 complex was purified from calf thymus by WASp(VCA) affinity chromatography [44 (link)]. WASP fragment construct GST-human WASp pWA was purified by Glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography [45 (link)]. Human fascin and both Human and C. elegans α-actinin were labeled with either Cy5-Monomaleimide (GE Healthcare) or TMR-6-Maleimide (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Skeletal muscle tropomyosin was purified from rabbit muscle acetone powder (Pel Freez Biologicals) and labeled as described [46 (link)]. Proteins containing SNAP fusions were labeled with SNAP-surface-549 or SNAP-surface-647 (New England BioLabs). Proteins were incubated with the dye overnight at 4°C according to manufacturer’s protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Labeling Efficiency Calculation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CLIP and SNAP tagged proteins were labeled using CLIP Surface-647 and SNAP Surface-647 dyes (New England Bio Labs), respectively. Purified protein at a concentration of 2 mg/ mL was incubated with 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 4x molar excess of dye at room temperature for 5 min, and then on ice overnight. Unlabeled dye was removed through dialysis in a Mini Dialysis Kit, 8 kDa cut-off (Cytiva) for 4 hours at 4°C, in buffer containing 50 mM phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 30% sucrose, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, followed by multiple rounds of concentration and dilution through an Amicon Ultra 0.5 mL concentrator (Sigma-Aldrich). Labeling efficiency was calculated by measuring absorbance at 280 nm and 650 nm (A280 and A650) and using extinction coefficients of protein and dye (ε280 and ε650 ), as
%labeling efficiency = 100x(A650ε650)(A280ε280)
The labeling efficiency for the proteins used in TIRF assays were Alexa 647-labeled Kif4A: 47%; Alexa 647-labeled PRC1: 17% and Alexa 647-labeled EB3: 45%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Enhancing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lentivirus particles were produced in HEK293T cells by co-transfection of the pHR transfer plasmids with second generation packaging plasmids pMD2.G and psPAX2 (a gift from Didier Trono, Addgene plasmid # 12259 and # 12260). Virus particles were harvested from the supernatant after 48-72 hr, filtered and applied to JRT3 cells overnight. The next day the cells were resuspended in fresh RPMI media and recovered for 3 days. DNA-CARζ-GFP expressing JRT3 cells were FACS sorted to generate a stable and homogeneous expressing population. JRT3 transduced with pHR-DNA-CARζ-IRES-puro/pHR-DNA-CARTCR-IRESpuro were selected at 4 μg/ml of puromycin (Sigma) and maintained with 2 μg/ml of puromycin.
FACs analysis of DNA-CARTCR expressing JRT3 cells revealed low surface expression (as compared to wild-type E6.1 Jurkats) of the full TCR complex, despite puromycin selection. To increase plasma membrane expression, JRT3 cells were subsequently transduced with pHR-TCRα-E2A-SNAPf:TCRβ-P2A-CD3ε-P2A-CD3ζ to enhance the expression of additional TCR subunits. Second, to selectively sort for cells with high surface expression levels of DNA-CARTCR, JRT3 cells were labeled with SNAP-Surface-647 (NEB) and sorted by FACS. This resulted in a population with a plasma membrane expression level of DNA-CARTCR that was comparable to wild-type Jurkats TCR levels (as compared by FACS analysis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Live-cell imaging of EGFR trafficking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were electroporated with SNAP-EGFR57 using the NEPA21 Electroporator (Nepa Gene Co., Ltd), and transduced with GFP-Rab7 (Life Technologies, C10588) two days prior to imaging. Cells expressing SNAP-EGFR58 and GFP-Rab7 were labeled with DiIC16TCO, DiIC16’TCO, or DMSO control for 5 minutes in DPBS with 1% BSA. The probe mixture was replaced with DMEM ph(−) and the cells were allowed to incubate for 15 minutes at 37°C. 1 μM SNAP-Surface-647 (NEB, S9136S) was added as per the manufacturers protocol. The cells were washed 3x with warm DPBS and incubated in DMEM ph(−) at 37°C for 20 minutes prior to imaging. 2 mL fresh DMEM ph(−) was added to the cells, and cells expressing both SNAP-EGFR and GFP-Rab7 were found. One frame was taken before addition of 100 ng/mL EGF in DMEM and all subsequent stacks were taken after the addition of growth factor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Live-cell imaging of EGFR trafficking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were electroporated with SNAP-EGFR57 using the NEPA21 Electroporator (Nepa Gene Co., Ltd), and transduced with GFP-Rab7 (Life Technologies, C10588) two days prior to imaging. Cells expressing SNAP-EGFR58 and GFP-Rab7 were labeled with DiIC16TCO, DiIC16’TCO, or DMSO control for 5 minutes in DPBS with 1% BSA. The probe mixture was replaced with DMEM ph(−) and the cells were allowed to incubate for 15 minutes at 37°C. 1 μM SNAP-Surface-647 (NEB, S9136S) was added as per the manufacturers protocol. The cells were washed 3x with warm DPBS and incubated in DMEM ph(−) at 37°C for 20 minutes prior to imaging. 2 mL fresh DMEM ph(−) was added to the cells, and cells expressing both SNAP-EGFR and GFP-Rab7 were found. One frame was taken before addition of 100 ng/mL EGF in DMEM and all subsequent stacks were taken after the addition of growth factor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent Labeling of Purified Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CLIP and SNAP tagged proteins were labeled using CLIP Surface-647 and SNAP Surface-647 dyes (New England Bio Labs), respectively. Purified protein at a concentration of 2 mg/ mL was incubated with 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 4x molar excess of dye at room temperature for 5 min, and then on ice overnight. Unlabeled dye was removed through dialysis in a Mini Dialysis Kit, 8 kDa cut-off (Cytiva) for 4 hours at 4°C, in buffer containing 50 mM phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 30% sucrose, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, followed by multiple rounds of concentration and dilution through an Amicon Ultra 0.5 mL concentrator (Sigma-Aldrich). Labeling efficiency was calculated by measuring absorbance at 280 nm and 650 nm (A280 and A650) and using extinction coefficients of protein and dye (ε280 and ε650 ), as % labeling efficiency = 100 x (A650 / ε650)/(A280 / ε280)
The labeling efficiency for the proteins used in TIRF assays were Alexa 647-labeled Kif4A: 47%; Alexa 647-labeled PRC1: 17% and Alexa 647-labeled EB3: 45%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!