The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

O arm

Manufactured by Medtronic
Sourced in United States, Ireland

The O-arm is a mobile surgical imaging system designed to provide intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging of a patient's anatomy. It is capable of capturing real-time, high-quality images to assist healthcare professionals during surgical procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

30 protocols using o arm

1

Posterior Lumbar Decompression and Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patient was placed in prone position after general anaesthesia. The first scan was performed by O-arm (Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland) to acquire three-dimensional images. Then a 3 ​cm incision was made lateral to the midline on the decompression side. Through the incision, dilator was placed and fixed. An operating microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Oberkochen, Germany) was used during laminectomy and discectomy. The facet joints and the ligamentum flavum were removed by oesteotome and laminectomy rongeur, and the traversing nerve roots, exiting nerve roots and the lateral edge of the dura were exposed and decompressed. The posterolateral annulus was incised, and discectomy was acted completely. After confirming the spacer size, a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with autologous cancellous bone was inserted accurately. The homolateral pedicle screw implantation was performed through the decompression incision. Posterior fixation on the contralateral side was done using percutaneous pedicle screws through two 1 ​cm incisions. A bended rod was place to connect the pedicle screws, and then, the intervertebral space was moderately compressed to make sure the cage was very solid. O-arm scan was acted again to make sure the position of the pedical screws. Then, we sutured incisions, and a drainage tube was placed underneath the fascia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intraoperative CT-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In intraoperative CT mode, the image coordinate system was obtained from a portable intraoperative CT (e.g. O-arm, Medtronic SNT, Louisville, CO, USA) or standard CT scan was taken at the time of surgery, with the patient already in position on the OR table. Spinal levels were identified and a CT scan was taken. Pedicle screw trajectories were planned and saved.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Navigated vs. Fluoroscopic Pedicle Screw Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were prospectively enclosed in this study, and randomly assigned to fluoroscopy (n = 18; C-arm, Siemens, Berlin, Germany) or navigation group (n = 19; O-arm, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) pursuant to which method was indicated preoperatively by a single senior spine surgeon (RR). All cases underwent a posterior spinal surgical approach for pedicle instrumentation at our institution between 11/2016 and 11/2017 by the same surgeon (RR). During the navigation cases an initial scan was performed prior to navigation and after pedicle screw placement, during which the whole OR personnel left the OR into a radiation shielded area. In non-navigated patients the whole surgery was performed fluoroscopy guided. In both groups, if necessary, interbody device implantation through a posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody (TLIF) approach and alignment correction was performed fluoroscopy guided after screw placement, which was not part of the study measurements any more. Anesthesia team left the OR into a shielded area during radiation emission in both study settings and was therefore not included. Patients’ demographic data (age, BMI) and surgery specific data were collected for the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating PVA-c Phantom Design

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A CT scan of the PVA-c phantoms was performed to validate the phantom design technique by quantifying their geometrical properties. O-arm (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) standard settings for the HD scan for a small head protocol (with 100 kVp, 20 mA, and 250 mAs) were used. Reconstruction was performed on a Medtronic mobile station using their proprietary software. The voxel resolution was 0.415 × 0.415 × 0.833 mm. The lumen diameters for the three vessels mimicking IVC, left renal vein and right renal vein were measured, as well as the infra-renal angles for the bifurcations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Robotic-Assisted Spinal Pedicle Screw Insertion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, the robotic system operated on one functional modality, intraoperative CT. In this mode, the image coordinate system was obtained from a portable intraoperative CT (e.g., O-arm, Medtronic SNT, Louisville, CO, USA) or a standard CT scan taken at the time of surgery with the patient already in surgical position (prone). The spinal levels were identified and a CT scan was taken. Pedicle screw trajectories were planned and saved. Reference frames were installed and fixated to the pelvis, and instruments and arrays with reflective markers were registered. A surgeon-controlled foot pedal activated and positioned the robot arm to the planned pedicle trajectory. Stab incisions were made on the skin using a scalpel. Pedicle screws were inserted using navigated instruments guided by the robotic arm. This sequence was repeated until all pedicle screws were placed. Rods were then placed and locking caps were set once the rods were in the proper position. Intraoperative CT images were taken to verify screw and rod position. In cases where interbody spacers were placed, they were placed manually. Surgical incisions were cleaned and closed in the standard fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Minimally Invasive Posterior Fixation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In OLIF, the patient was placed in the right decubitus position. A transverse incision of approximately 4 cm was made on the skin in the left lateral region of the abdomen. After dissection of the external oblique, internal oblique, and transverse abdominal muscles, the retroperitoneal space was accessed by blunt dissection through the retroperitoneal fat tissue. The psoas muscle was retracted posteriorly. The targeted intervertebral disc space was exposed, and the tubular retractor system was set. Under direct visualization, a discectomy was performed and both cartilaginous endplates were thoroughly removed, and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with allograft was placed in the disc spaces. After performing OLIF, percutaneous screw insertion to the cephalad and caudal vertebrae was performed in the lateral position without position change using an intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT)-based navigation system (O-arm; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). We used the modified cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw technique as previously reported (Fig. 2) [18 (link)]. Rods were then placed. This series of procedures were performed without intraoperative neuromonitoring. After the surgery, the patient was allowed to walk with a hard brace and was required to wear the brace for at least 2 months after the surgery (Fig. 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, the robotic system operated on one functional modality, intraoperative CT. The image coordinate system was obtained from a portable intraoperative CT (e.g., O-arm, Medtronic SNT, Louisville, CO, USA) or a standard CT scan taken at the time of surgery with the patient already in surgical position (prone). After a CT scan was taken and the spinal levels identified, pedicle screw trajectories were planned and saved. Reference frames were installed and fixated to the pelvis, and instruments and arrays with reflective markers were registered. A surgeon-controlled foot pedal activated and positioned the robot arm to the planned pedicle trajectory. Stab incisions were made on the skin using a scalpel. Pedicle screws were inserted percutaneously using navigated instruments guided by the robotic arm. Per case, one attending spine surgeon and one resident performed pedicle screw placement consistently on either the left or right side. This sequence was repeated until all pedicle screws were placed. Rods were then placed and locking caps were set once the rods were in the proper position. Intraoperative CT images were taken to verify screw and rod position. Interbody devices when used were inserted manually. Surgical incisions were cleaned and closed in the standard fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Posterior Fixation of Craniovertebral Junction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the prone position, the head was placed in a 3-point skull fixation system (Mayfield headrest) and the neck slightly flexed; a preoperative 3D radiographic reconstruction with OArm (Medtronic) was acquired.
Under EX vision and magnification, by means of a midline linear incision, C0–C3 skeletonization was performed to expose posterior CVJ. With the aid of neuronavigation, a posterior instrumentation was variably performed. We used screws into the occipital crest in cases 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and case 4 (redo surgery). On the other hands, C2 isthmic screws were put in cases 4 and 6, laminar screws in cases 1, 2, 3, 5, and case 4 (redo surgery), in C3 lateral masses in cases 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and case 4 (redo surgery). In one case, screws were put also in C4 (case 5) (OCT 2-VUE POIN® Nuvasive System). All the constructs were fixed with bilateral hinged rods [Table 2]. Bone Fusion was performed by decorticating the occiput and posterior arches of the cervical facet joints by high-speed drill and curettes, along with demineralized bone paste (AttraX® PUTTY Nuvasive) to stimulate bone fusion. Finally, further OArm acquisition documented the satisfactory placement of the stabilization system.
The clinical follow-up evaluation was performed according to the Nurick's Grade at different time points. According to one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, changes are considered significant when P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

O-Arm-Guided Vertebroplasty: Precision Spinal Intervention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the O-arm procedure we used the O-arm (Medtronic PLC, Littleton, Massachusetts, USA) integrated with Stealth Station Navigation System (Medtronic PLC, Louisville, Colorado, USA). Patients under general anaesthesia were placed prone on the radiolucent table. Sterile preparation of the operation site was followed by attachment of the reference frame to the spinous process and three-dimensional (3D) examination of the treated spinal segment with the O-arm. During the data acquisition (not exceeding 30 s), all medical personnel were outside the operating theatre. The data were automatically transmitted to the neuronavigation system (Figure 1) and used to guide the vertebroplasty needle into the target vertebra (Figures 2, 3). After proper needle placement the PMMA was injected under the real-time image given by the O-arm switched to the fluoroscopy mode.
The O-arm also enabled post-procedural 3D imaging to be obtained to estimate the result of vertebral body filling and to visualize potential extravertebral cement leak. Mean volume of PMMA injected per vertebra was 4.03 ml (range: 2.0–7.5 ml). Radiation dose and time were recorded by a built-in dosimeter. In the lumbar vertebrae mean volume of injected PMMA was higher than in the thoracic ones (respectively: 4.58 ml and 3.42 ml).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Atlas Lateral Mass Screw Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten fresh, adult human cadavers were utilized; none had been previously used for any other purpose. With the cadavers in a prone position, the atlas and axis posterior surfaces were exposed. All cadavers underwent a 3D baseline radiologic assessment using an O-arm (Medtronic PLC, Littleton, MA, USA) to assess anatomic variations.
Dissection of the medial edge of the atlas was performed under magnification. The ALM entry point was 2 mm lateral to MEC1. C1 cortex penetration was performed using a high-speed drill, and a tap was used to advance into the ALM. The planned trajectory was perpendicular to the horizontal plane and parallel to the inferior border of the C1 posterior arch (IAC1), as previously suggested.[1 (link)] Multiaxial screws (Vertex, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, USA) were used. All instrumentation was done without imaging guidance. Following screw insertion, 3D images were obtained, using an O-arm, to assess screw location.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!