The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

59 protocols using arium pro

1

Zeta Potential Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the zeta potential, the samples (1 g in wet basis) were dispersed in Ultrapure water (Sartorius Arium® Pro) (10 mL) and then diluted 10 times with Ultrapure (Sartorius Arium® Pro) water again. The sample was allocated to capillary cells and the zeta potential was determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). All the experiments were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tannins Quantification by Folin-Ciocalteu Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tannins concentration was determined following the Tandon method [21 ]. In summary, for sample extraction, 400 mg of the sample (wet basis) was diluted in 20 mL of 70% aqueous acetone solution and kept under stirring for 2 h at RT. Then, the samples were filtered in a vacuum filter using a Whatman filter paper No. 1 and the volume of the extraction was made up to 20 mL using Ultrapure water (Sartorius Arium® Pro). After that, 100 µL of the extract was transferred to a glass tube and 900 µL of Ultrapure water (Sartorius Arium® Pro) was added. Then, 500 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (1 N) and 2.5 mL of Na2CO3 20% (w/w) aqueous solution were mixed into the tube. The solutions were kept at RT in the dark for 40 min. Optical density was determined using a spectrophotometer (V530, JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 725 nm. The concentration of tannins was estimated using a standard curve of tannic acid. The standard curve was prepared using tannic acid at concentrations of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 µg/mL (R2 = 0.9931). The tannins concentration (g/kg) was expressed as tannic acid equivalent. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Determination of Phytate Concentration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phytates concentration was determined according to the method described by Raboy [22 (link)]. In brief, 500 mg of samples (wet basis) were mixed with 5 mL of 0.2 M HCl: 5% Na2SO4 and extracted overnight at 4 °C. Then, the samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000× g and 250 µL of the supernatant was allocated to a glass tube with 2.25 mL of 0.2 M HCl:5% Na2SO4 and 5 mL of iron solution (0.2 g of (NH4)Fe(SO4)2·12H2O in diluted in 1 L of 0.2 M HCl) and placed in a boiling water bath for 30 min. Following this, the samples were cooled at RT and centrifuged for 20 min at 4500× g; 1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 1.5 mL of HL reagent (1 g of 2,2′ bipyridine, 1 mL thioglycolic acid dissolved in 100 mL Ultrapure water (Sartorius Arium® Pro)). The absorbance of the samples was read using a spectrophotometer (V530, JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 519 nm. The time between the addition of the HL reagent to the samples and the readings was 1 min. The phytates concentration (mg/kg) was determined using a phytic acid standard curve. The standard curve was prepared using phytic acid at concentrations of 0.625, 0.8, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 10 µg/mL. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Porcine Ear Topical Formulation Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Niacinamide (NIA), k-C RG, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), jojoba oil, tween 80, oleic acid, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) powder, k-carrageenan, chloroform, jojoba oil, trypsin, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Alabaster, AL, USA). l-α-phosphatidylcholine (EPC) was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). Ethanol absolute (≥99.8%) and methanol (≥99.8% HPLC grade) were obtained from Fisher Chemical (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). Double-deionized water was provided by an ultra-pure water system (Arium Pro, Sartorius AG, Gottingen, Germany). The porcine ears were acquired in a local slaughterhouse (Porto, Portugal). Reagents were weighted in a digital analytical balance Kern ACJ/ACS 80-4 (Kern & Sohn; Balingen, Germany). The pH measurements were achieved using a Crison pH meter GLP 22 with a Crison 52-02 tip (Crison; Barcelona, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analysis of Human Milk Carbohydrates by GPC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total HM carbohydrates were analyzed using GPC. Glycans were separated by the GPC stationary phase and eluted according to size and charge. Neutral mono-, di-, and oligosaccharides, and acidic oligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerization (DP), could be detected. HM carbohydrate solution was prepared by dissolving 0.2 g/mL of total HM carbohydrates in ultrapure water (Sartorius Arium Pro) containing 2% (v/v) 2-propanol at 37 °C. Five milliliters of 0.2 µM filter-sterilized HM carbohydrate solution were injected for each GPC run. The sample loop was cleaned by ultrapure water prior to analysis. Two connected Kronlab ECO50 columns (5 × 110 cm) packed with Toyopearl HW 40 (TOSOH BIOSCIENCE) were used. Milli-Q water was maintained at 50 °C using a heating bath (Lauda, RE 206) for column equilibration. Milli-Q water containing 2% (v/v) 2-propanol was used as the eluent. The flow rate of the eluent was set at 1.65 mL/min. Eluting glycans were monitored by refractive index detection (Shodex, RI-101). The resulting chromatograms were analyzed by using Chromeleon® software (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Porcine Skin Wound Healing with Sodium Alginate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium alginate was purchased from ACROS OrganicsTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, MA, USA). Calcein, k-CRG, RV tartrate, and Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (10×) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Exelon® patches were acquired from Novartis. Acetonitrile was acquired from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NY, USA). Silicone moulds were obtained from Micropoint Technologies (Pioneer junction, Singapore). Fresh porcine ears obtained from different adult animals were purchased in a local slaughter (Porto, Portugal). Double-deionised water was provided by an ultra-pure water system (Arium Pro, Sartorius AG, Gottingen, Germany). The reagents were weighted in a digital analytical balance Kern ACJ/ACS 80-4 (Kern & Sohn; Balingen, Germany). pH measurements were achieved using a JENWAY 550 pH meter (Staffordshire, UK). Texture analysis was performed using a TA.XT2 Texture Analyser (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Haslemere, UK). SEM and confocal fluorescence microscopy studies were performed at the Laboratory for Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis and High-Resolution Microscopy Unit, respectively, both at CEMUP (Materials Centre of the University of Porto, “Centro de Estudos de Materiais da Universidade do Porto”). Histological samples have been processed in the histological service of “ICBAS, Universidade do Porto”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chestnut and Peanut Shell Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chestnuts (C) and peanuts (P) were purchased from a local market and the shells were separated manually. Ultrapure water was produced with an Arium© Pro instrument from Sartorius (Goettingen, Germany). Ammonia aqueous solution (NH4OH, ACS reagent, 28–30% solution) was purchased from Merck. 9,10-Diphenylanthracene (>99%) was purchased from Ega-chemie.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Modulation of Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following small molecules were evaluated for induction or reduction of pathway activity. Wnt: CHIR99021(#SML1046) [36 (link)], LY2090314 (#SML1438) [36 (link)], niclosamide (N3510) [37 (link)], LGK-974 (#S7143) [36 (link)]; Hh: SAG dihydrochloride (SAG, #SML1314) [38 (link)], sonidegib (#S2151) [39 (link)], vismodegib (#S1082) [40 (link)]; Notch: suberohydroxamic acid (SBHA, #390585) [41 (link)], DAPT (#S2215) [42 (link)], Dibenzazepine (DBZ, #S2711) [43 (link)], valproic acid sodium salt (VPA, #P4543) [44 (link)]. All reagents were purchased from Selleckchem (Munich, Germany) or Sigma Aldrich. VPA and SAG were dissolved in ultrapure water (Arium pro, Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany), and the remaining compounds in DMSO (#D5879, Sigma-Aldrich).
Transfections and evaluations were performed as described above, with the following changes: For induction of the Wnt-pathway in the respective wells, 100 μl conditioned medium (containing wnt3a, see above) was added to the wells four hours after transfection. Compounds were also added four hours after transfection, at a final concentration of 10μM. An equal amount of appropriate solvent (water or DMSO) was added to the solvent control conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Ergothioneine and Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
L-ergothioneine (ET; purity > 98%), ET sulfonate (ET-SO3H), L-hercynine, S-methyl ET, and heavy-labelled L-ergothioneine-d9 (ET-d9) and L-hercynine-d9 were provided by Tetrahedron (Paris, France; www.tetrahedron.fr). Stock solutions (1 mM) were prepared in ultrapure water (Arium pro, Sartorius AG, Gottingen, Germany) and stored at −20 °C. HPLC-grade acetonitrile and methanol, and MS graded formic acid were purchased from Fisher (Hampton, USA), GC-grade acetone from Tedia (Fairfield, USA), Triton X-100 from USB corporation (Cleveland, USA), and phosphate buffered saline (PBS)from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma - Aldrich (St Louis, USA) unless otherwise stated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Protocol for Phthalate Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stock standard solutions containing the seven metabolites investigated (i.e., monoethyl phthalate (MEP); mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP); mono-butyl phthalate (MBP); mono-cyclohexyl phthalate (MCHP); mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP); mono(3,5,5-trimethylhexyl) phthalate (MTMHP); and mono-n-octyl phthalate (MnOP) (100 mg/L in cyclohexane)) were supplied by Neochema GmbH (Germany). Working solutions for calibrations were prepared by serial dilution of the stock standard mixture with acetonitrile (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) Beta-glucuronidase from Escherichia coli (200 units/mL) was purchased from La Roche AG group. BSTFA (N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide) with 1% of TMCS (trimethylchlorosilane) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ammonium acetate (98%), calcium chloride (CaCl2) (≥99%), creatinine hydrochloride (≥97%), ammonium phosphate dibasic (≥99%), magnesium chloride hexahydrate (≥99%), potassium chloride (≥99%), sodium sulfate (≥99%), urea (≥98%), acetone (99.9%), formic acid (≥95%), and methanol (99.9%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Nanopure water was provided by an ultrapure water system (Arium Pro, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!