The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using acquity uplc h class plus

1

UPLC-PDA Method for Compound Purity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters Acquity H-Class Plus UPLC with PDA detector was used to qualitatively assess compound purity. M1TFV/M2TFV Method: 98% HPLC-grade Methanol, 2% 7.5 mM Ammonium Bicarbonate pH 7.0; flow 1.0 mL/min; column − Phenomenex Kinetex 5 µm C18 100 A, 150 × 4.6 mm with Phenomenex SecurityGuard and C18 4 × 3.0 mm guard cartridge; 3D data with lambda 190−490 nm, resolution 1.2 nm, sampling rate 10 points/sec on a Waters Acquity H-Class Plus UPLC with PDA detector. TAF Method: 60% HPLC-grade Methanol, 40% 7.5 mM Ammonium Acetate pH 4.0; flow 0.500 mL/min; column − Phenomenex Kinetex 5 µm C18 100A, 150 × 4.6 mm with Phenomenex SecurityGuard and C18 4 × 3.0 mm guard cartridge; 3D data with lambda 190−490 nm, resolution 1.2 nm, sampling rate 10 points/s on a Waters Acquity H-Class Plus UPLC with PDA detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Kinetic Analysis of CES1 Enzyme Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant human CES1 protein expressed
in E. coli was purchased from Creative BioMart (CES1-106H)
as a 10 mg/mL stock
solution. Before use, CES-1 protein was thawed on ice and diluted
in the working buffer (1× PBS (pH 7.4)/acetonitrile, 98/2 (v/v)).
To make a 100 μg/mL working solution, 10 μL of CES1 stock
solution and 10 μL of ATP (100 mM) were diluted in the working
buffer (1 mL). A solution without CES1 protein was also prepared as
a blank control. BDW568 were prepared as 8 mM, 7 mM, 6 mM, 5 mM, 4
mM, 3 mM, 2 mM, and 1 mM solution in DMSO. One microliter of each
BDW568 solution was added to 19 μL working solution and incubated
at 37 °C for 1 h. Twenty microliters of ethanol were then added
to stop the reaction by denaturing CES1 protein. The supernatant (10
μL) was used for UPLC-MS analysis. The ratio between metabolite
and BDW568 was determined and used to calculate the reaction rate
(pmol/min). The Michaelis–Menten curves were plotted using
GraphPad Prism 8. UPLC-MS conditions: instrument: Waters ACQUITY UPLC
H Class Plus in tandem with a Qda mass detector; column: ACQUITY UPLC
BEH C18 1.7 μm (21 × 50 mm); mobile phase: Acetonitrile
(organic phase) and 0.1% formic acid water solution; gradient: 0 min,
2% acetonitrile; 3 min, 98% acetonitrile; 5 min, 2% acetonitrile.
UPLC-MS results were analyzed using Waters Empower 3 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extraction and UPLC Analysis of Alkaloids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We cut and sampled 100 mg leaf disks from the 4th, 5th, and 6th leaves from the growing point of regenerated plants (T0 generation). The sampled leaves were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground using a Mixer Mill MM300, and added to 500 ml of 99% (v/v) methanol. After shaking at 30°C at 2,000 rpm for 2 h, the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at room temperature for 20 min, and the supernatant was transferred to another tube. For extraction, the supernatant was filtered using an Ultra-free-MC 0.22-µm filter, and the filtrate was used as a sample. For UPLC (ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS, Waters) analysis, an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm 2.1×100 mm column (Waters) was used with 30% (v/v) methanol and 0.1 M phosphoric acid (pH 2.0) at 1 ml min−1. The column temperature was 40°C and detection was performed by UV (281 nm) absorbance. Catharanthine, vindoline, and ajmalicine, which served as standards in this experiment, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RP-UPLC Analysis of Hydrolysis Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the samples were analyzed by reverse phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UPLC) using a Watters ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) system adjusted to 215 nm.
The hydrolysis fractions were then injected into a C4 Colum (2.6 µm 150 × 2.1 mm) after filtration at 0.22 µm with polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) filters. The injection volume was 2.5 μL. The flow rate was set at 0.3 mL·min−1.
The elution program was as follows: The mobile phases were ultrapure water/trifluoroacetic acid (99:1, v/v) as solvent A and acetonitrile/trifluoroacetic acid (99:1, v/v) as solvent B. A gradient was applied with solvent B increasing from 5% to 30% in 30 min, then to 60% for 10 min and held until 47min at 95%, then back to initial conditions. UV absorbance scans were performed between 200 and 390 nm at a rate of one spectrum per second with a resolution of 4.8 nm. Chromatographic acquisition and analysis were performed with Empower 3 software (Version 3 Waters). Each sample analysis was performed in triplicate to ensure technical reproducibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Acquity UPLC H Class PLUS and Xevo TQ - XS system equipped with UPLC and Q/Q/Q (Waters Corporation, Milford, DE, USA) were used. UPLC conditions used were identical to those described in the above UPLC-UV analysis, flowing at 0.25 mL/min. MRM mode and experiment condition are shown in Table S1. Electrospray ionization: ESI, positive ion mode. The ion source capillary was 2.5 kV. Cone was 21 v. The capillary temperature was 250 °C. Flow rates of the cone gas and desolvation gas were 600 L/Hr and 150 L/Hr. Data were acquired with the Xcalibur software system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources (Fisher, Sigma-Aldrich, Combi-Blocks and Suzhou Medinoah Ltd) and used as received. Reactions were tracked by TLC (Silica gel 60 F254, Merck) and Waters ACQUITY UPLC-MS system (ACQUITY UPLC H Class Plus in tandem with QDa Mass Detector). Intermediates and products were purified by a Teledyne ISCO Combi-Flash system using prepacked SiO2 cartridges. NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker AV400 or AV500 instrument (500 MHz for 1H NMR, 126 MHz for 13C NMR). 13C shifts were obtained with 1H decoupling. MestReNova 14.0.1 developed by MESTRELAB RESEARCH was used for NMR data processing. MS-ESI spectra were recorded on Waters QDa Mass Detector. The UPLC-MS was performed on a Waters BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) with peak detection at UV 254 nm (mobile phase: acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water; gradient: 0–5 min, 2–98% acetonitrile). Purities of final compounds were assessed by UPLC-MS. All compounds are > 95% pure by UPLC analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of CES1 in Knockout Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CES1
knockout cells
as well as their parental THP-1-IFNAR2KO cells (106) were
treated with 50 μM BDW568 for the indicated time. Cells were
collected and washed by 1× PBS once, and then 50% acetonitrile
was added and vortexed for 1 min. Samples were centrifuged at 17,000 g for 10 min to remove insoluble cell debris. Compound 4 (0.5 μL at
1 mM; see Supplementary Information) was
added to the supernatant of each sample (19.5 μL) as an internal
standard for UPLC-MS analysis. Ten microliters of the mixed solution
were injected into UPLC-MS for analysis with the following conditions:
instrument: Waters ACQUITY UPLC H Class Plus in tandem with a Qda
mass detector; column: ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 μm (21 ×
50 mm); mobile phase: acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid water solution;
gradient: 0 min, 2% acetonitrile; 3 min, 98% acetonitrile; 5 min,
2% acetonitrile; UPLC-MS results were analyzed using Waters Empower
3 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of (S)-Warfarin 7-Hydroxylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(S)-Warfarin 7-hydroxylation by CYP2C9 was measured as previously reported, with several modifications [23 (link)]. The reaction mixture, in a total volume of 150 μL, consisted of the following components: the microsomal fraction (25 μg), (S)-warfarin (0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, or 40 μM), and 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Following pre-incubation at 37 °C for 3 min, reactions were initiated by the addition of 10 mM NADPH, with incubation at 37 °C for 60 min. Reactions were terminated by adding 150 μL of acetonitrile containing 25 nM 7-ethoxycoumarin as an internal standard. After protein removal by centrifugation at 15,400× g for 10 min, 10 μL of the supernatant was injected into an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-fluorescence system consisting of an ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), ACQUITY UPLC FLR Detector (Waters), and an ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8-μm particle size; Waters) maintained at 40 °C. The mobile phase was a mixture of acetonitrile and water (40:60, v/v) containing 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. (S)-7-Hydroxywarfarin content was measured at an excitation wavelength of 320 nm and an emission wavelength of 415 nm. Standard curves were constructed in the 12.5–6400 nM range using metabolite standards, with a quantification limit of 10 nM for (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Targeted Metabolomics Analysis by UPLC-TOFMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lyophilized culture broth samples were dissolved in methanol–water mixture (1:1, by vol.) and centrifuged (15 min, 15,000 rpm; centrifuge ELMI CM-50, Latvia). The samples were chromatographed on an ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS (Waters, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a time-of-flight mass-selective detector Xevo G2-XS TOF (Waters, USA). An 0.5 µL sample aliquot was injected on a Titan C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 µm; Supelco, Bellefonte, CA, USA) column maintained at 50°C and eluted with a gradient of 10 mM solution of ammonium acetate in deionized (Simplicity UV, Millipore, France) water (solvent A) and LC-MS grade (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain) acetonitrile (solvent B) delivered at a rate of 0.5 mL/min. The following gradient program was used (vol. % of the solvent B): 0–1 min, from 5% to 15%; 1–2 min, from 15% to 65%; 2–3 min, from 65% to 85%; 3–5 min, from 85% to 95% (see also [33 (link)]). The analysis was carried out in the negative ion detection mode (m/z range of 100–1900), the ion source parameters were: ion source temperature—150 °C, desolvation temperature—650 °C; capillary voltage—3.0 kV; sample injection cone voltage—30 V; nitrogen (desolvation gas) flow rate—1101 L/h. The recorded data were processed with MassLynx v. 4.2 software (Waters, USA) and CTA was quantified using external calibration method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sphingolipid Quantification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sphingolipids were measured using the LC–MS/MS system (LC: Acquity UPLC® H-class PLUS; MS: Xevo TQ-S micro, WATERS Corporation). Briefly, 5.0 μL samples were injected and the LC separation was performed using a general-phase column [U-InertInertSustainSwift Amide 3um column: 2.1 × 100 mm (UP), GL Sciences Inc, USA ] with a gradient elution of solvent A (10 mM Ammonium acetate, 95% acetonitrile, 5% water) and solvent B (10 mM Ammonium acetate, 50% acetonitrile) at 0.6 mL/min. The conditions were as follows: A gradient run was performed at 99% solvent A and 1% solvent B for 1 min, followed by an at 90% solvent A and 10% solvent B for 1 min, next 3 min performed at 60% solvent A and 40% solvent B which followed by an at 20% solvent A and 80% solvent B for 2 min. Total run time 11 min, target column temperature 50.0a°C, target sample temperature 10.0 °C.
The mass spectrometer was operated in electrospray ionization-positive ion mode and the analytical conditions were as follows: the cone gas flow was set at 50 (L/Hr), the desolvation gas flow at 1000 (L/Hr), the source temperature at 150.0 °C, desolvation temperature at 600.0 °C.
The analyses were performed in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode in the positive ion mode for sphingolipids. The MRM settings are described in Supplemental Table S1. The data were analyzed by MassLynx, TargetLynx XS (WATERS Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!