The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xience 5

Manufactured by Abbott
Sourced in United States, China

The Xience V is a medical device designed for use in the treatment of coronary artery disease. It is a drug-eluting stent, which means it is a small, expandable tube that is placed in a narrowed or blocked artery to help improve blood flow. The device is coated with a medication that is released over time to help prevent the artery from becoming blocked again.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using xience 5

1

EES Implantation and Cardiac Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was performed as a sub-study of the Tokyo-MD PCI registry, a physician-initiated, multi-center, observational registry in Japan. The registry has been described previously (20 (link)-22 (link)). In brief, the registry included consecutive patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Xience V, Abbott, Abbott Park, USA; Promus, Boston Scientific, Natick, USA) implantation in 22 centers in Japan from January 2010 to December 2011. The purpose of the present study was to compare HC and non-HC patients on the day of PCI. Patients with cardiac shock at hospitalization, cancer, and those lost to follow-up were excluded from this study. A total of 1,866 patients of 1,918 patients who underwent EES implantation were included in this study (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PCI Outcomes with Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was a retrospective single-center study involving 3,881 patients who underwent PCI using a second-generation drug-eluting stent in our hospital (Kurashiki Central Hospital) between January 2010 and December 2013. If multiple PCIs were performed on the same patient, the first PCI in the study period was included in the analysis. As a result, 3,453 patients were included in the analysis. After excluding 43 patients who lacked data for calculating risk scores, we enrolled 3,410 patients exclusively treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (Endeavor; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA; XIENCE V, Abbott
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PCI Trial for Female Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The design of the SPIRIT Women study was reported elsewhere.[12 (link), 13 (link)] The trial was conceived as a substudy of the main SPIRIT Women study that was registered in 2007 (NCT00496938). Subsequent changes in the original protocol were made and the randomized study was registered a separate one in 2010 (NCT01182428). Complete study protocol is available among Supporting Information files (S1 Study Protocol).
455 female patients admitted for PCI at 25 centers (22 in Europe and 3 in South America), between September 2008 and December 2009, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive DP-EES (Xience V and Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or DP-SES (Cypher Select, Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA). The trial was funded by Abbott Vascular. The study complied with the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board at each participating center (S1 Table). Eligible patients provided written, informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

G2-DES Implantation and Restenosis Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All enrolled patients received G2-DESs implantations in the catheterization centre. The type of G2-DESs included zotarolimus-eluting stents (Endeavor and Endeavor Resolute; Medtronic Vascular, USA), domestic sirolimus-eluting stents (Firebird2; MicroPort Medical, China), everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V and Xience Prime; Abbott Vascular, USA, Promus and Promus Element; Boston Scientific, USA). Stent implantation was performed according to current practice guidelines, and stents were selected by experienced interventional cardiologists. During the procedure, patients received a bolus of 100 IU/kg heparin with a repeated bolus of 2000 IU heparin to maintain the activated clotting time of ≥ 300 s. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/day was administered) and clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg/day for at least 12 months). When ISR was diagnosed, patients were treated with re-DES implantation. Procedural success was defined as follows: reduction of stenosis to less than 10% residual narrowing; thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade III; improvement in ischaemic symptoms; and no major procedure related complications [7 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rabbit Iliac Artery Endothelial Denudation and Stent Implantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
New Zealand White adult rabbits underwent endothelial denudation of both iliac arteries using an angioplasty balloon catheter (Maverick, 3.0 × 12 mm, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA). Subsequently, 3.0 × 12 mm everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Xience V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (Cypher, Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, NJ) or 3.0 × 12 mm bare metal stent with an identical strut backbone to EES (BMS) (Multi-link Vision, Abbott Vascular) were deployed at a target stent-to-artery diameter ratio of 1.3:1 in each iliac artery, respectively. Each rabbit was randomized for BMS and DES (SES, EES) placement in each iliac artery in a 1:1:1 distribution resulting in an equal number of arterial stenting for each stent type. Stented arteries were harvested at 28 days as previously described.22 (link) Confocal light microscopy (LM) was used to assess stent morphometry and histology. The extent of arterial injury at the site of stent struts was graded by the method of Schwartz et al.23 (link)En face scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess stent endothelialization. See online supplemental materials for further details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparison of Absorb BVS and Xience V

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Absorb BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, USA) is a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold which consists of a fully biodegradable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) platform covered by an amorphous matrix of poly-D,L-lactide (PDLLA) and everolimus. It is gradually resorbed in the process of hydrolysis to non-inflammatory products, such as CO2 or H2O [3 ]. The average strut thickness is 157 µm. Eighty percent of drug release occurs within 30 days.
The Xience V (Abbott Vascular, CA, USA) is a cobalt-chromium stent coated with a non-erodible fluoropolymer loaded with 100 μg/cm2 of everolimus. The thickness of the metallic struts and coating combined is approximately 90 µm (81 µm for the stent and 7.8 µm for the polymer ≈ 90) [8 ]. The antiproliferative drug concentration and release profile are similar in both stents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Intravascular Imaging Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following materials were used for the interventions: Guidewire (Pilot 50, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), IVUS catheter (Atlantis SR pro, 40 MHz, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) and OCT catheters (C7 DragonflyTM St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA aided by a Twin-pass catheter, Vascular Solutions Inc. Minneapolis MN, USA).
The following stents were used: Xience V (Everolimus eluting stent, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), Biomatrix (Biolimus eluting stent, Biosensors Int. Singapore), Focus NP (Sirolimus eluting stent, Envision Ltd. Surat, India) and Amazonia Croco (BMS, Minvasys, Gennevilliers, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bifurcation Lesion Management with EES vs ZES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All in vivo study subjects were selected from the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) OCT Registry. We identified 137 cases of bifurcation lesions with SB diameter ≥2mm on angiogram and treated with a Xience V (EES: everolimus-eluting stent) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or Resolute Integrity (ZES: zotarolimus-eluting stent) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) from August 2010 to January 2014. We excluded cases of restenosis (n=20), cases treated with two stents (n=12), and those with poor image quality (n=17). Finally, we included 42 EES and 46 ZES cases in the analysis. The registry protocol was approved by each institution’s ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Outcomes of Second-Generation DES in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We combined data from 7 prospective, randomized trials enrolling patients with second‐generation DES that were maintained at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (New York, NY) in which treated lesion ACC/AHA class was determined at an angiographic core laboratory. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Clinical follow‐up was performed for up to 5 years. The designs of the trials have been previously described and are summarized in Supplemental Table S1.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 As we sought to study contemporary DES outcomes, only patients in which a single lesion was treated with a contemporary second‐generation DES (Xience V or Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA; Promus, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA; Nobori, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan; and Resolute Integrity, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) were included in the analysis. Patients were censored at time of first event or at last follow‐up time, whichever occurred first. Each trial was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at the respective participating centers, and all patients signed written informed consent before randomization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UBDP-DES vs. DP-DES in STEMI Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures were performed according to current standard guidelines. Before PPCI, patients were pre-medicated with aspirin (at least 100 mg) and a loading dose of P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Heparin was administered throughout the PPCI to maintain an activated clotting time of ≥250 s. A glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker was administered at the operator’s discretion. Coronary angiography was performed using the standard techniques. Decisions to use thrombectomy devices, intravascular ultrasound, an intra-aortic balloon pump, or percutaneous cardiopulmonary support were made by the operator. STEMI patients implanted with the UBDP-DES (Orsiro™ (Biotronik AG, Bülach, Switzerland); n = 160; from 1 February 2015 to 22 July 2017) were compared to our historic cohort implanted with the DP-DES (Xience V™ [Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Endeavor Resolute™ (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA); n = 196; from 1 June 2008 to 15 September 2010).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!