The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rnatri

Manufactured by Bio&Sell

RNATri is a laboratory equipment designed for the isolation and purification of RNA from various biological samples. It utilizes a specialized extraction method to effectively separate RNA from other cellular components.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using rnatri

1

Optimized RT-PCR Profiling of NAGNAG Splicing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate NAGNAG alternative splicing by RT-PCR, we optimized our established protocol for RNA extraction and RT-PCR (54 (link)). RNA was extracted using RNATri (Bio&Sell) followed by DNase I digestion, and 1 μg of RNA was used in a gene-specific RT reaction (combining up to four gene-specific reverse primers). PCR with a 32P-labeled forward primer was performed, and products were separated by denaturing 6% PAGE and quantified using PhosphorImager and ImageQuantTL software. During primer design, products were restricted to a length of 90 to 150 nt to optimize separation of the two NAGNAG products. To validate our rMATS-derived %PSU values, RT-PCRs targeting 10 NAGNAG introns (see table S8 for primer sequences) were performed using RNA samples from seven knockdowns and two batches of siCTRL. Mean rMATS-derived %PSU values were correlated against mean PCR-derived %PSU values. The high degree of reproducibility also enabled us to use RT-PCRs to compare single and double knockdowns.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Circadian Rhythm Sampling in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal experiments were performed with C57BL/6 mice in accordance with institutional and governmental recommendations and laws. Mice were kept under constant 12‐h light–dark conditions. RNA samples across a circadian day, from constant darkness or after jet‐lag were previously generated (Preussner et al., 2014). Mice of both genders were used. For preparation of RNA, tissues were quickly removed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and homogenized in RNATri (Bio&Sell). For preparation of nuclear extracts, we first prepared single‐cell suspensions of freshly isolated liver samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RT-PCR Gene Expression Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-PCRs were done as previously described (37 (link)) Briefly, RNA was extracted using RNATri (Bio&Sell) and 1 mg RNA was used in a gene-specific RT-reaction. Low-cycle PCR with a 32P-labeled forward primer was performed, products were separated by denaturing PAGE and quantified using a Phosphoimager and ImageQuantTL software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and RNA-Seq of Naïve and Memory CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve and memory CD8+ T cells were generated using the OT-I system as described previously (32 (link),33 (link)). RNA-Seq was done essentially as described (34 (link)). Briefly, total RNAs were prepared using RNA-Tri (Bio&SELL) and further purified using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) in combination with a DNase I (Qiagen) treatment. RNA sequencing libraries were prepared by using the TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation kit (Illumina). 125-bp paired-end reads were generated by using a HiSeq 2500 sequencer (Illumina) with V4 sequencing chemistry. Triplicate samples from naïve and memory T cells were sequenced (around 40 × 106 reads per sample) and analyzed using a MISO-based pipeline (35 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying UPF1 Isoform Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from ∼1 × 106 cells using RNATri (Bio&Sell) and 0.5 μg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription with the UPF1 reverse primer (sequence given below). To detect the mRNA corresponding to the two isoforms of human UPF1, we designed primers specific to sequences in exons 7 and 8, which flank the alternative 5′-splice site and, upon amplification, would generate products of 166 and 133 bp for human UPF11 and UPF12 isoforms, respectively. The primer sequences are as follows: forward 5′-GGGACCTGGGCCTTAACAAGAAGAGA-3′ and reverse 5′-ATCCCTTTCCACAGGGGCGCAAGGT-3′. Plasmids expressing the human UPF11ΔCH and UPF12ΔCH proteins were used as positive controls. For quantification of mRNA levels of the two isoforms low-cycle PCRs were performed with the 32P-labeled forward primer (sequence given above), products were resolved by denaturing-PAGE and analyzed using a Phosphoimager and the ImageQuantTL software (GE Life Sciences). The mRNA preparations of different mouse tissues were analyzed as described above, using the human-specific forward primer (sequence given above, identical to the mouse sequence in this region) and the following mouse-specific reverse primer: 5′-ATCCCCTTCCACAGGGGCGCCAGAT-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptome Analysis of U2AF35 Knockdown

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs from control siRNA and U2AF35 siRNA transfected cells, as well as Q157R, Q157Rdel, and Q157P rescue cell lines, were purified using RNA-Tri (Bio&SELL) and further purified using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) in combination with a DNase I (Qiagen) treatment to prevent genomic DNA contamination. RNA sequencing libraries were prepared by using the TruSeq mRNA Library Preparation kit (Illumina). Of note, 125-bp paired-end reads were generated by using a HiSeq 2500 sequencer (Illumina) with V4 sequencing chemistry. Biological duplicates were sequenced for all conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of EIF4A2 Isoforms by RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using RNATri (Bio&Sell) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RT-PCRs were performed as previously described [68 (link)]. Briefly, 1 µg RNA was used in a gene-specific RT-reaction and PCR was performed with a 32P-labeled forward primer, products were separated by denaturing PAGE and quantified using a Phosphoimager (Typhoon 9200, GE Healthcare) and ImageQuantTL software. Quantifications are given as mean values, error bars represent standard deviation and P-values were calculated using Student’s unpaired t test. Significance is indicated by asterisks (**P < 0.01). Primers hEIF4A2_E2/3_F (GTG TCA TCG AGA GCA ACT GG) and hEIF4A2_E5_R (TAT CAA ACA CTC TCC CGG GT) were used to detect long and short EIF4A2 isoforms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR and Splicing Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT–PCRs were done as previously described (Preussner et al., 2014). Briefly, RNA was extracted using RNATri (Bio&Sell) and 1µg RNA was used in a gene‐specific RT reaction. For analysis of minigene splicing, the RNA was additionally digested with DNase I and re‐purified. Low‐cycle PCR with a 32P‐labeled forward primer was performed; products were separated by denaturing PAGE and quantified using a Phosphoimager and ImageQuantTL software. For qRT–PCR, up to four gene‐specific primers were combined in one RT reaction. qPCR was then performed in a 96‐well format using the ABsolute QPCR SYBR Green Mix (Thermo Fisher) on Stratagene Mx3000P instruments. qPCRs were performed in duplicates, mean values were used to normalize expression to a housekeeping gene (mouse: Hprt, human: Gapdh, plants: Ipp2; ΔCT), and Δ(ΔCT)s were calculated for different conditions. See Table EV2 for primer sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Minigene Splicing Analysis in HEK293T

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minigenes were transfected into HEK293T cells using Roti-Fect, and cells were harvested after 48 hours. RNA was extracted using RNATri (Bio&Sell), and genomic/plasmid DNA was eliminated via DNaseI digest. RNA (1 μg) was used in a plasmid-specific reverse transcription (RT) reaction. The minigene was analyzed using plasmid-specific primers (Supplemental Table 2) upstream and downstream of the inserts in a standard PCR reaction. The obtained products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. Low-cycle PCR was performed with a 32P-labeled forward primer, and the products were separated by denaturing PAGE. Bands were visualized with a Phosphoimager and quantified using ImageQuantTL. Quantifications are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!