The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ez sx series

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The EZ-SX Series is a line of analytical lab equipment manufactured by Shimadzu. The core function of this product is to perform spectrophotometric analysis, which is a widely used technique for measuring the absorbance or transmittance of light by a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using ez sx series

1

Tensile Strength Evaluation of Photocured Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten samples per group with hourglass shape were prepared in a metallic matrix that was 8.0 mm long, 2.0 mm wide, and of 1.0 mm thickness, with a cross-sectional area of ±1 mm2. Each uncured sample was placed in the mold and photoactivated for 20 s on each side (bottom and top). The prepared samples were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. The samples were fixed in jigs with cyanoacrylate resin, and they were submitted under tensile strength in a universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 1 mm/min until fracture. The maximum force value (Newtons, N) achieved was divided by the constriction area of each sample, which was measured with a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan) to calculate the maximum value of tensile strength (Equation (2)). The results were expressed in megapascals (MPa).
Equation (2): UTS (MPa)=(Force (N)Constriction area (mm2))
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tensile Strength of Metallic Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten specimens per group (8.0 mm long, 2.0 mm wide and 1.0 mm thickness) were prepared using a metallic matrix with a cross-sectional area of ±1 mm2 (±0.1 mm2) and an hourglass shape. After 24 h, the samples were glued onto metallic jigs using the cyanoacrylate resin. A micro tensile strength test was performed using a universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The specimens were stressed at 1 mm/min crosshead speed until fracture. The result in MPa was calculated by dividing the maximum force value to the fracture (N) by the area of each sample at the constriction at the hourglass shape (mm²).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tensile Strength Evaluation of Resin Infiltrants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resin infiltrants were tested for ultimate tensile strength (UTS) using ten samples per group [29 ]. The samples were prepared in a metallic mold measuring 8.0 mm long, 2.0 mm wide, and 1.0 mm thickness. The mold presented an hourglass shape with 1 mm2 of the constriction area. Uncured resin infiltrants were placed into the mold, and a polyester strip (K-Dent, Biodental Produtos Dentários LTDA, Criciuma, SC, Brazil was used to cover the bottom and the top of each sample. The samples were photoactivated for 40 s on the bottom and 40 s on the top. During the photoactivation process, the beam of the light-curing unit was directly in contact with the sample surface, separated only by the thin and transparent polyester strip. The samples were carefully removed from the mold and immersed in 1.5 mL of distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. The constriction area of each sample was measured with a digital caliper, and the samples were bonded into a metallic jig with cyanoacrylate adhesive. The samples were tested for tensile strength universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until the fracture occurs in the constriction area. The results were expressed in megapascals (MPa) after dividing the force (Newtons) necessary to break each sample and its constriction area (mm2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tensile Strength of Denture Liners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the mechanical property of the liners after their contact with the solutions (distilled water or distilled water with PHMGH), five samples per group were prepared (n = 5). First, the powder and the liquid of GC COE COMFORT® were mixed at 6:5 by weight, according to the manufacturer's instruction. Each mix of denture liner was placed into a silicone mold, according to ASTM D638-02a [27 ]. The mold was placed between two glass plates and the pressure was applied to extrude excess materials and to remove air bubbles. Then, a load of 1 kg was applied above the set.
Each sample was removed from the mold and placed in a distilled water bath at 37 °C for 40 h to complete the setting. Then, the samples were immersed in the different solutions containing PHMGH (PHMGH0.125%, PHMGH0.25% and PHMGH0.5%) or pure distilled water (GCTRL) for 5 or 10 min. After the contact with the solutions, the samples were placed in a metallic device to pull each one and test their tensile strength in a universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu). The crosshead speed used was of 500 (±50) mm/min according to ASTM D638-02a [27 ]. The samples were tested up to their failure of tensile strength and the maximum value was calculated in megapascals (MPa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flexural Strength Test of Dental Resins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The flexural strength test was conducted according to ISO 4049 [34 ]. Six rectangular mini-flexural specimens (n = 6) per group were prepared in a metallic mold that was 12.0 mm long, 2.0 mm wide, and 2.0 mm thick [35 (link)]. For the preparation of the specimens, the dental resin was dispensed into the mold and covered with polyester matrix strips. Polymerization was performed in two windows for 20 s on each side of the specimen. The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. The specimens were submitted under tensile strength in a universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 1 mm/min until fracture. Flexural strength was calculated from the following equation:  σ=3LF2BH2
where σ is the flexural strength (MPa), F is the maximum load (N), L is the distance (mm) between the holders (up to 0.01 mm), B is the width (mm) at the center of the specimen, and H is the height (mm) of the specimen, measured with a digital caliper just before the test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flexural Strength of Dental Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the flexural strength tests, a metallic matrix measuring 25 ± 0.1 mm x 2.0 ± 0.1mm x 2.0 ± 0.1mm was used to produce rectangular specimens (n=10). Specimens were photoactivated for 30s in two windows on each side and stored in distilled water for 24 h and six months for immediate and longitudinal analyses. At each time point, specimens were submitted to a three-point flexural strength test in a universal mechanical testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/ min. The values were recorded in newtons (N) and transformed into mega pascal (MPa) by the formula prescribed in ISO 4049:2009 [23] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microtensile Bond Strength Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To guarantee that the testing machine operator was blinded, each composite block was numbered according to the randomization sequence. Blocks were sectioned into sticks with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.8 mm 2 using a water-cooled diamond saw in a cutting machine (Isomet, Buehler, Lake Bluff, USA). Approximately 40 sticks were obtained for each block. The sticks were carefully examined with a stereomicroscope (HMV-2, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at 40× magnification. Those with interfacial flaws, gaps, bubbles, or other defects were discarded. The cross-sectional area of each stick was measured with a digital caliper (Absolute Digimatic, Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan) to calculate the bond strength values, measured in MPa. Pretesting failures were not observed. The bonded sticks were attached to a universal testing machine for microtensile testing (EZ-SX series, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) with cyanoacrylate and tested at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The µTBS, measured in MPa, was obtained by dividing the load at failure (N) by the cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) of each stick.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of Polymer Tensile Strength

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A metallic hourglass-shaped mold was used to prepare the samples (n = 5) [19 (link)] with the dimensions of (8 mm long, 2 mm wide, 1 mm thick, and a cross-sectional area of 1 mm2) [18 (link)]. Polyester strips were placed above and below each mold, and each sample was photoactivated for 20 s. After that, samples were measured using a digital caliper, then soaked in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C. Finally, each sample was fixed in a metallic jig using cyanoacrylate resin, maintaining parallelism between the applied force and the sample’s long axis, in preparation for tension load in a universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 1 mm/min of crosshead speed. Later, samples were broken at the concentration area, values were obtained in newton (N) and divided by the concentration area revealing results in megapascal (MPa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microtensile Strength of Metallic Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), ten samples per group, n = 10, were prepared using a metallic matrix (hourglass-shaped with 8.0 mm long x 2.0 mm wide x 1.0 mm thickness) with a cross-sectional area of 1 mm 2 at the constriction. The samples were photoactivated for 30 s on each side. After 24 h, the samples were fixed in a metallic device with cyanoacrylate resin and submitted to microtensile strength in a universal testing machine (EZ-SX Series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min; the values were reported in MPa. 28 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!