The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using ab2868

1

Histological Analysis of Dysferlin and Evans Blue in Muscle Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryosections (8–10-mm thickness) were prepared from frozen skeletal and cardiac muscles and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded liver. Histological staining was performed with hematoxylin-phloxine-saffron.
Immunodetection was performed with the monoclonal antibody dysferlin-Hamlet (NCL-Hamlet, diluted 1:50) as described previously28 (link) or with the monoclonal dysferlin-Romeo (ab124684; Abcam) diluted 1:50. Mouse anti-CD11b (550282; BD Biosciences; Le Pont de Claix, France); diluted 1:40 was used to detect inflammatory cells and RyR (ab2868; abcam) diluted 1:200 was used to perform colocalization of dysferlin in T-tubules. Sections were mounted with DAPI-Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) and examined under a confocal microscope Leica TCS SP2.
Evans Blue dye positive fibers were revealed by fluorescence excitation at 633 nm on a Leica confocal fluorescent microscope on cryosections treated 10 minutes in frozen acetone. Sections were mounted with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech) before the observation. The cartography of the whole section was performed using a motorized stage at an original 40x magnification and using the software Cartograph (Microvision, Evry, France). The ratio of the area corresponding to the Evans Blue positive cells versus the whole area of the section was measured using Image J in the red channel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Evaluation of Cardiac Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After LPS stimulation for 24 hours, mice were euthanized, and then the heart was harvested for histological analysis with paraffin imbedded sections. The 5 µm thick sections were used for morphological analysis. Histologically, hematoxylin‐eosin (H&E) staining was performed to evaluate the cardiomyocytes arrangement. For immunohistochemistry, the paraffin sections were heated in a pressure cooker for antigen retrieval and incubated with CD68 antibody (ab125212, Abcam) or TUNEL probe. Goat anti‐rabbit EnVisionTM+/horseradish peroxidase reagent was added, followed by subsequent staining with DAB detection kit (Gene Tech, Shanghai, China). For immunofluorescence assay, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), supplemented with 1% BSA and 1% Triton X‐100 overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: Serca (Abcam, ab2816) and RyR2 (Abcam, ab2868). The primary antibodies were detected with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti‐mouse/rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti‐mouse/rabbit IgG and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. Quantification was performed with Image‐Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis of Ryanodine Receptor 2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was homogenized in homogenization buffer containing (in mm): HEPES 20, NaCl 150, EDTA 5, KF 25, sodium orthovanadate 1 with glycerol 20%, triton X‐100 0.5% and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, cOmplete), pH 6.8. Anti‐RyR antibody (Abcam, ab2868) was incubated with Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen) for 40 min at room temperature (1 μl antibody + 11 μl beads per sample). The beads were washed with PBS‐0.05% Tween‐20 twice and homogenization buffer once. A 400 μl aliquot of lysate (total protein concentration of 1 mg ml−1) was incubated at 4°C overnight with antibody‐bead in homogenization buffer. After washing, electrophoresis was performed using protein gels of 8%. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes using the Trans‐Blot semi‐dry transfer system (BioRad). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in PBS‐0.05% Tween‐20 solution containing 5% dried skimmed milk. Antibodies used were RyR2 (Abcam, ab2868, 1:5000) and pSer2808 RyR2 (Badrilla, A010‐30AP, 1:1000). Data were normalized to RyR in the immunoprecipitated sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Muscle RYR1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot (WB) analyses of muscle biopsy samples were performed as previously described [15 (link)], using NuPAGE™ 3–8% Tris-Acetate Mini Gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to allow separation of large-size molecular weight proteins. Mouse monoclonal anti-ryanodine receptor antibody ab2868 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) (1:1000) and mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody ab8245 (Abcam) (1:8000) (as internal standard) were used for this analysis. ImageJ v.1.53a software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, accessed on 29 May 2020) was used for densitometry analyses. Muscle samples from nine healthy individuals were used as controls. The levels of the RYR1 protein in patients grouped in each cluster were expressed in reference to the control mean, which was set to 100%. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was performed for statistical analysis using Prism version 7.04 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis of iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The iPSC-CMs in a well of 6-well plate were detached with Trypsin–EDTA (Gibco, 25200056), and then pelleted at 300 g for 3–5 min at 4 °C. After washing with DPBS, the pellets were re-suspended in 50–100 μl lysis buffer. Lysates were placed on ice for 30 min and the supernatants were collected after centrifuging at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. Protein concentration was measured using a BCA kit (Pierce, 23227). Western blot was performed with the following antibodies: SERCA2a (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-53010, 1:200, RRID: AB_630230), RYR2 (abcam, ab2868, 1:500, RRID: AB_2183051), sodium/calcium exchanger 1 (NCX1) (ProteinTech, 55075-1-AP, 1:500, RRID: AB_2881262), Cav 1.2 (ProteinTech, 21774-1-AP, 1:2000, RRID: 21774-1-AP), total phospholamban (PLN) (Cell Signaling Technology, 14562S, 1:1000, RRID: AB_2798511), phosphorylated PLN (Cell Signaling Technology, 8496S, 1:1000, RRID: AB_10949102), Nav1.5 (Alomone Labs, ASC-005, 1:500, RRID: AB_2040001), and GAPDH (Abmart, M20006, 1:5000, RRID: AB_2737054). Intensity values for each band were determined as the integrated density (sum of pixel values) within a fixed area using Quantity One software (Biorad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of ER Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein (100–120 μg of total protein per lane) was separated through sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels of 5% (for RyR2), 10% (for SERCA2 or BiP), and 12% (for CHOP, Cleaved caspase-3, or β-actin) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The PVDF membranes were probed with anti-SERCA2 (sc-376235, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., USA), anti-RyR2 (ab2868, 1:500, abcam, USA), anti-BiP (ab21685, 1:1,000, abcam, USA), anti-CHOP (sc-7351, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., USA), or anti–Cleaved caspase-3 (#9664S, 1:800, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), followed by appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. The β-actin (A5316, 1:10,000, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) gene was used as the internal standard for normalization of the protein samples. Chemiluminescence was revealed using PierceTM enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western Blotting Substrate (32106, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and densitometry performed using Quantity One 1-D software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!