The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using tsk gel pwxl guard column

1

Fragmentation and Purification of Vi Capsular Polysaccharide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vi, freeze dried as the sodium salt, was solubilized in water and H2O2 was added to give a final concentration of 2.5 mg/mL Vi and 5% (wt/v) H2O2 in water. The mixture was heated at 80±0.5°C for 2h. The mixture was then injected into a Hiscreen Capto Q [GE Healthcare] column (4.7 mL of resin loading up to 100 mg of fragmented Vi mixture) equilibrated with buffer A and populations of different average size were separated using a gradient step method. NaH2PO4 20 mM pH 7.2 and NaH2PO4 20 mM NaCl 1M pH 7.2 were used as buffer A and B respectively. Pools at average size Vi of 8.6 and 43 kDa were eluted at 25 and 37% of buffer B respectively. Each pool was desalted on a Sephadex G-25 column [GE Healthcare] equilibrated with water. The average size of the fragmented Vi pools was determined by HPLC-SEC equipped with a TSK gel 3000 PWXL column and a TSK gel PWXL guard column (Tosoh Bioscience). Dextrans (5, 25, 50, 80, 150 kDa) were used as standards (Sigma Aldrich). The mobile phase was 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 M NaH2PO4, 5% CH3CN, pH 7.2, at the flow rate of 0.5 mL/min (isocratic method for 30 min). HPAEC-PAD was used to measure Vi content [10 (link), 21 (link)]. 1H NMR was used to verify Vi identity and confirm O-acetylation levels were >60% [10 (link), 21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Molecular Weight Determination of γ-PGA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentration and mass average molecular weight (Mw) of γ-PGA was determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The GPC was equipped with a TSKgel GMPWxl column (300 × 7.8 mm, Tosoh Bioscience GmbH, Griesheim, Germany) and a TSKgel PWxl guard column (40 × 6 mm, Tosoh Bioscience GmbH, Griesheim, Germany). The column was eluted with 30 mM KNO3 at 40 °C at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Peaks were detected with the RI detector of the integrated EcoSEC HLC-8320GPC system (Tosoh Bioscience GmbH, Griesheim, Germany). Data analysis was performed with the software WinGPC UniChrom (PSS Polymer Standards, Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany). Poly(ethylene oxide) standards with peak molecular weights (Mp) in the range of 56 to 1015 kDa (PSS Polymer Standards, Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany) were used to create a calibration curve for molecular weight. γ-PGA sodium salt (cosmetic grade; kindly provided by Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Düsseldorf, Germany) was used to create a calibration curve to determine concentrations. Culture broth was diluted 1:50 with distilled water and filtered with 0.2 μm filters (Bulk GHP Acrodisc 13 mm syringe filter, GHP membrane, N° 4567, Pall Life Sciences, Dreieich, Germany). 30 μL of the standards and of the filtrated samples were injected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC-SEC Analysis of OAg Molecular Weight

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OAg molecular weight (MW) distribution was evaluated by HPLC-SEC as previously described [30 (link), 48 (link)]. Samples were run, without pretreatment, on a TSK gel G3000 PWXL column (30 cm x 7.8 mm; particle size 7 μm; cod. 808021) with a TSK gel PWXL guard column (4.0 cm x 6.0 mm; particle size 12 μm; cod. 808033) (Tosoh Bioscience). The mobile phase was 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 M NaH2PO4, 5% CH3CN, pH 7.2, at the flow rate of 0.5 mL/min (isocratic method for 30 min). Void and bed volume calibration was performed with λ-DNA (λ-DNA MW Marker III 0.12–21.2 kb; Roche) and sodium azide (NaN3; Merck), respectively. OAg peaks were detected by differential refractive index (dRI). OAg average MW was estimated on standard dextrans (Sigma) calibration curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-SEC-MALS Analysis of Sample Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relevant samples were analyzed by HPLC‐SEC‐MALS in order to determine particle composition and estimate purity. All experiments were performed using the HPLC system mentioned in 2.11 with the Chromeleon 7 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for method programming, control and data acquisition. A TSKgel G5000PWXL column (300.0 × 7.8 mm i.d.) combined with a TSKgel PWXL guard column (40.0  × 6.0 mm i.d.) (Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart, Germany) was used. A volume of 50 µL of each sample was injected. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. Isocratic elution was performed with 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.2. UV signals at 280 and 260 nm were recorded by the Chromeleon software and LS signal was acquired with a DAWN HELEOS 18‐angle detector (Wyatt) with the Astra Software 5.3.4 (Wyatt). Data evaluation was performed in Astra 6.1.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Profiling of Plasma HMW Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance size-exclusion chromatography of the KCH plasma samples (n = 35, from 13 patients) was performed using a TSKgel® G5000PWXL column (hydroxylated methacrylate, 10 µm particle size, 100 nm mean pore size; Tosoh Bioscience, 0008023) equipped with a TSKgel® PWXL guard column (hydroxylated methacrylate, 12 µm particle size, mixed pore size; Tosoh Bioscience, 0008033). Totally, 20 µL plasma was fractionated with PBS as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. The high molecular weight (HMW) fraction (7.86–8.96 ml eluent) was denatured, reduced, alkylated, digested, and DDA–MS was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEC-MALS-FL Analysis of Macromolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEC‐MALS‐FL measurements were performed using the same HPLC system, detectors and software as described in Section 2.7.
A TSKgel G5000PWXL 300.0 mm × 7.8 mm i.d. in combination with a TSKgel PWXL guard column 40.0 mm × 6.0 mm i.d. (both Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart, Germany) were used for size exclusion chromatography. The method was previously described by Steppert et al. 20. Data analysis was done in Astra 6.1.2 using the number density procedure and the sphere model fit with a particle refractive index of 1.46 29.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of S. flexneri GMMA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. flexneri 2a and 1b GMMA were produced and purified as previously described [31 (link)]. GMMA total protein content was estimated by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) using BSA as a reference. The total OAg amount and sugar composition were determined by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC–PAD), after performing acid hydrolysis directly on GMMA. In particular, the OAg amount was quantified based on the detection of rhamnose, as previously described [33 (link),34 (link)]. The OAg extracted was characterized by high performance liquid chromatography–size exclusion chromatography (HPLC-SEC) (TSK gel 3000 PWXL column with TSK gel PWXL guard column equilibrated in 0.1 NaCl, 0.1 NaH2PO4, 5% CH3CN, Tosoh Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) with differential refractive index (dRI) detection, using dextrans as the standards to estimate the molecular size distribution as previously described [31 (link),33 (link)]. OAg structures were confirmed by 1H-NMR analysis measured with a Bruker AvanceIII 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz and 323 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Shigella GMMA Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. sonnei, S. flexneri 2a, and S. Typhimurium GMMA were produced and purified as previously described [6 (link)]. The total protein content was estimated by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) using BSA as a reference. The total OAg amount and sugar composition were determined by HPAEC–PAD analysis, after performing acid hydrolysis directly on GMMA. In particular, the OAg amount was quantified based on the detection of repeating unit-specific monosaccharides (2-aminouronic acid for S. sonnei; rhamnose for S. flexneri 2a and S. Typhimurium), as previously described [34 (link),35 (link),36 (link)]. Purity and particle sizes were established by HPLC–SEC MALS, using TSK gel G6000PW + G4000PW columns (Tosoh Bioscience, Tokio, Japan) in series equilibrated in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) [37 (link)]. The OAg extracted was characterized by HPLC–SEC (TSK gel 3000 PWXL column with TSK gel PWXL guard column equilibrated in 0.1 NaCl, 0.1 NaH2PO4, 5% CH3CN, Tosoh Bioscience, Tokio, Japan) with differential refractive index (dRI) detection using dextrans as the standards to estimate the molecular size distribution, as previously described [34 (link),35 (link)]. The ability of each GMMA to stimulate IL-6 release from human PBMC was evaluated by MAT [38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC-SEC Analysis of OAg Molecular Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC—SEC analysis was used to estimate the molecular size distribution of OAg populations [34 (link),36 (link)]. Samples were run, without pre-treatment, on a TSK gel G3000 PWXL column (30 cm x_7.8 mm; particle size 7 um; cod. 808021) with a TSK gel PWXL guard column (4.0 cm _x 6.0 mm; particle size 12 um; cod. 808033) (Tosoh Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan). The mobile phase was 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 M NaH2PO4, 5% CH3CN, pH 7.2, at the flow rate of 0.5 ml/min (isocratic method for 30 min). OAg peaks were detected by differential refractive index (dRI). Void and bed volume calibration was performed with λ-DNA (λ-DNA molecular weight (MW) Marker III 0.12–21.2 kb; Roche) and sodium azide (Merck, New Jersey, USA), respectively. OAg average MW was estimated on standard dextrans (Sigma) calibration curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dietary Fiber Fractionation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine contents of insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), soluble dietary fiber (SDF), and low-molecular weight soluble dietary fiber (LMW-SDF), a combination of the methods AOAC 985.29 [22] and AOAC 2009.01 [23] was applied. The principle of the method is based on enzymatic digestion of starch and proteins by applying a sequence of thermostable α-amylase, protease, and amyloglucosidase. SDF and LMW-SDF were differentiated according to their (in)solubility in 80% ethanol. Ethanol-soluble LMW-SDF was obtained from the filtrate after precipitation of SDF and analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography (Hitachi, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with refractive index (RI) detection (Knauer, Berlin, Germany) using a TSKgel PWxl guard column (40 mm × 6.0 mm, particle size 12 µm, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) and two size-exclusion columns in a row (TSKgel G2500PWxl, 300 mm × 7.8 mm, particle size 13 µm, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) [12] (link). IDF and SDF contents were corrected for residual protein [21] (link) and ash contents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!