The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gold enhancement solution

Manufactured by Nanoprobes

Gold enhancement solution is a laboratory reagent used to amplify and visualize gold nanoparticles or gold-labeled biological samples. It contains a mixture of chemical components that enables the deposition of additional gold onto existing gold structures, enhancing their signal or contrast for various analytical techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using gold enhancement solution

1

Immunogold Labeling of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed, permeabilized for 10 minutes with 0.25% saponin, 0.1% BSA in PBS, and blocked (0.2% BSA, 5% Normal Goat Serum, 50mM NH4Cl, 0.1% saponin, 20mM phosphate buffer, 150mM NaCl). Coverlips were then incubated with primary antibody (anti-UBC9 BD Biosciences or anti-LC3 Novus Biologicals) for 2 hours, washed (0.1% BSA, 0.1% Saponin in PBS) and incubated for 1 hour with secondary antibodies conjugated with nanogold (Nanoprobes). Samples were then fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde for 1 hour and nanogold was enlarged with a gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes) according to manufacture instructions, postfixed (1% OsO4, 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4), enbloc stained with 1% uranyl acetate over/night at 4°C, dehydrated with ethanol, embedded in EPON 812 and cured in an oven at 60°C for 48 hours. Ultrathin sections (70-90nm) were cut on an ultramicrotome (Leica FC7, Leica microsystem). Grids were stained with uranyl acetate and Sato’s lead solutions and observed in a Leo 912AB Zeiss Transmission Electron Microscope (Carl Zeiss). Digital micrographs were taken with a 2Kx2K bottom mounted slow-scan Proscan camera (ProScan, Lagerlechfeld, Germany) controlled by the EsivisionPro 3.2 software (Soft Imaging System).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunogold Labeling for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% PFA EM grade and 0.2 M HEPES buffer for 1 h at RT or in Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde (PLP) for 2 h at RT. After three washes in PBS, cells were incubated 10 min with 50 mM glycine and blocked 1 h in blocking buffer (0.2% bovine serum albumin, 5% goat serum, 50 mM NH4Cl, 0.1% saponin, 20 mM PO4 buffer, 150 mM NaCl). Staining with primary antibodies and nanogold-labeled secondary antibodies (Nanoprobes) were performed in a blocking buffer at RT. Cells were fixed for 30 min in 1% GA and nanogold was enlarged with gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were post-fixed with OsO4 and processed as described for conventional EM. Images were acquired with Talos L120C TEM (FEI, Thermo Fisher Scientific) operating at 120 kV. Images were acquired with a Ceta CCD camera (FEI, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using Velox 3.6.0 (FEI, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Localization of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wildtype and AMACO-deficient newborn mouse back skin was excised and carefully sliced into 1 mm cubes and stored in either Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) or Michel’s Buffer. The skin samples were subsequently incubated in a solution of a polyclonal affinity-purified antibody (Table 1), diluted 1:5 in serum-free DMEM, overnight at 4 °C. The tissue cubes were washed in DMEM for 4 h and subsequently immersed in a 1 nm gold-labeled diluted secondary antibody suspension (Aurion GAR ultrasmall, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pa), overnight at 4 °C. After a rigorous wash in DMEM, the tissues were immersed in gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY), rinsed, fixed in 1.5% glutaraldehyde, 1.5% paraformaldehyde with 0.05% tannic acid, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, and then dehydrated and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy. The stained sections were examined using either a Philips EM410LS or a FEI Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope (Thermofisher, Hillsboro, Or).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Immunogold Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 hr at room temperature. Subsequently, cells were permeabilized, blocked, and incubated sequentially with PML primary antibodies (Millipore MAB3738 or Abcam ab72137) and nanogold-conjugated secondary antibodies (Nanoprobes) diluted in blocking buffer. After washes, cells were re-fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde, and nanogold was enlarged with gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes). Cells were post-fixed with osmium tetroxide, embedded in epon, and processed into ultrathin slices. After contrasting with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, sections were analyzed with a Zeiss LEO 512 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sensitive hCG Pregnancy Test Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine samples were collected according to a protocol approved by IRB of Georgia Institute of Technology. The hCG-positive control (McKesson, Irving, TX) (urine matrix, 200 mIU/ml) was serially diluted with urine to set the concentration from 2.5 to 40 mIU/ml. The samples were directly loaded into the AuNP-based hCG pregnancy test kit (McKesson, Irving, TX) embedded in our device from the designated sample inlet concurrently with gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY) and DI water from auxiliary inlets. The hCG-AuNPs complex and unbound AuNPs were captured at the test and control lines, respectively, and produced a red color initially (fig. S7, i to iii). Following the delivery of gold enhancement reagents, AuNPs were enlarged because of the autometallographic reaction, which made the test and control line colors darker, yielding better contrast and higher signal intensity (fig. S7, iv to vi).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Localization of PMP70 in Mouse Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mouse eye was prepared and pre-embedding labelled performed using an antibody against the 70-kDa peroxisomal membrane protein, PMP70, before embedding for TEM as described [10 (link)]. In brief, a mouse eye sacrificed at 1.5 hours after light onset was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Sections were cut using a cryostat and permeabilised using 0.02% saponin in 1% BSA in PBS for 30 mins. Antibody labelling was performed using an antibody against PMP70 (Novus Biologicals) in 1% BSA in PBS overnight at 4°C. Secondary Nanogold (Nanoprobes) in 1% BSA in PBS was applied to the sections for 2 hrs before re-fixing in 2% PFA, 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer for 1 hr. Gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes) was applied to the sections following the manufacturers guidelines on ice at 4°C before preparing for TEM as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunogold Labeling for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated on alcian blue-coated glass coverslips and fixed 10 min with 0.05% glutaraldehyde in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) EM grade and 0.2 M HEPES buffer and 50 min in 4% PFA EM grade in 0.2 M HEPES buffer. After three washes in PBS, cells were incubated 10 min with 50 mM glycine and blocked 1 h in blocking buffer (0.2% bovine serum albumin, 5% goat serum, 50 mM NH4Cl, 0.1% saponin, 20 mM PO4 buffer, 150 mM NaCl). Staining with primary antibodies and nanogold-labeled secondary antibodies (Nanoprobes) were performed in blocking buffer at room temperature. Cells were fixed 30 min in 1% glutaraldehyde and nanogold was enlarged with gold enhancement solution (Nanoprobes) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were post fixed with osmium tetroxide, embedded in epon, and processed into ultrathin slices. After contrasting with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, the sections were analyzed with Zeiss LEO 512 electron microscope. Images were acquired by 2k × 2k bottom-mounted slow-scan Proscan camera controlled by the EsivisionPro 3.2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!