The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using hiscript 2 q rt supermix with gdna wiper

1

Quantification of mRNA and miRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted using the CTAB method (Chang et al., 1993 ) with slight modification. cDNAs were generated using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme). For miR397, the stem‐loop primer for reverse transcription was added during cDNA synthesis (Chen et al., 2005 (link)). PcActin and PcU6 served as reference genes for analysis of expression levels of mRNA and miR397, respectively. The U6 sequence of pear was obtained by local BLAST search against the P. bretschneideri genome (http://peargenome.njau.edu.cn) using U6 of maize (GenBank accession number X52315.1). RT‐qPCR was carried out on a CFX96 Real‐time System (Bio‐Rad) using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme). Each analysis included three biological replicates for each treatment. Relative expression levels were quantified by the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). Primers used in RT‐qPCR are listed in Table S6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptome Analysis by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the cells were collected from each group, the total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, United States), and cDNA was synthesized with HiScript II QRT SuperMix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme Biotech, China). SYBR Green-based qPCR was run on a LightCycler 480 (Rouche, United States) using ChamQ Universal SYBR® qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, China). The amplification process data were analyzed using Ct (2−ΔΔCt) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Was extracted from RAW264.7 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration of total RNA was measured with a Nanodrop-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA), and the total RNA was then subjected to qPCR using HiScript II Q RT Super-Mix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme Biotech Co, Nanjing, China). qRT-PCR was performed using the AceQ® qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) with GAPDH (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) as the internal reference. The CT value obtained from real-time PCR was used to calculate relative changes in gene expression by the 2-ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Knockout Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from knockout cell lines was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, 15596018) and 1 μg of total RNA, in 20 μL mixed reverse‐transcription reagent, was reverse transcribed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme, R223‐01). The specific primer pairs (Table S3) were used for qPCR amplification utilizing the ViiA™ 7 Real‐Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The qPCR reaction includes 1 μL of cDNA templates, 10 μmol/L of each specific primer and 10 μL 2 × ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Q331‐02). The reaction procedure was set as follows: 95°C for 3 minutes and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds followed by 60°C for 1 minute. Relative quantification of the target gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔct method. Each reaction was performed in triplicate, and the data were calculated as M ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression analysis was done using species-specific QRT-PCR. Primers were designed using NCBI’s Primer-BLAST [22 (link)]. Primer sequences are shown in Table S3. RNA was extracted from tissues and cells using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and reverse-transcribed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. QRT-PCR was performed on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad, USA), using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, China). The QRT-PCR protocol was as follows: 1 cycle of 30 s at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the relative gene expression was determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method using beta-actin as a reference gene [23 (link)]. Statistical significance between two groups was determined via Student’s t-test on GraphPad Prism (v6.01). p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (74134, Qiagen), cDNA was generated using HiScript II Q RT Super Mix with gDNA wiper (R223, Vazyme Biotech), and qPCR was performed using the AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Q111, Vazyme Biotech). Relative quantification was performed using the comparative Ct method with normalization to Actin. Primer sequences are available in Supplementary Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative RT-PCR for Bacterial Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial cells were cultured in 1/10 TSB and collected at an OD600 of ~1.0. RNA extraction was carried out with a bacterial RNA extraction kit (Yeasen MolPure, China). The concentration and quality of RNA were detected with an Eppendorf BioPhotometer Plus. cDNA synthesis was performed with 250 ng of RNA using a kit (Vazyme HiScript II Q RT SuperMix with gDNA wiper). Primers for qRT-PCR designed with primer 3 online are shown in Table S1, and the 16S rRNA gene was used as a reference. The qRT-PCRs was performed on a Quantstudio 6 Flex system (Applied Biosystems) using ChamQ SYBR qPCR master mix (Vazyme). The experiment was repeated three times, each time in triplicate. Relative expression was analyzed using the threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCT) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!