The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nexera x2 uhplc

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan, United States, New Zealand

The Nexera X2 UHPLC is a high-performance liquid chromatography system designed for efficient and accurate separation and analysis of a wide range of compounds. It features a high-pressure pump, autosampler, column oven, and diode array detector to provide reliable and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

49 protocols using nexera x2 uhplc

1

Determination of Muscle Acyl-Carnitine Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle acyl-carnitine content was measured based on a modified method of Giesbertz [31 (link)]. Pulverized gastrocnemius samples were homogenized and internal standard (C17-carnitine) was added. Next, the samples were extracted with the use of ice-cold methanol, centrifuged (10,000× g/4 °C/10 min), and the supernatants were dried under nitrogen in fresh tubes. After that, dried acyl-carnitine samples were derivatized to form butyl esters. In this step, the samples were shaken for 20 min at 60 °C in 100 µL n-butanol containing 5% v/v acetyl chloride. Then the samples were evaporated again, reconstituted in 100 µL methanol/water and transferred to glass vials for UHPLC/MS/MS analyses. Acyl-carnitines were quantified on a Sciex QTRAP 6500+ triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (AB Sciex Germany GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) using positive ion electrospray ionization (ESI) with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) against standard curves constructed for each compound. The chromatographic separation was performed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu Nexera-X2 UHPLC). The analytical column was a reversed-phase Zorbax SB-C18 column 2.1 × 150 mm, 1.8 µm (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolic Profiling of Plasma Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fasting plasma samples were collected at baseline before the implementation of dietary interventions and stored at −80 °C. Samples were shipped on dry ice to the Broad Institute (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) for metabolomics analyses. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to semi-quantitatively profile succinate, malate, citrate, aconitate, isocitrate and D/L-2-hydroxyglutarate (the method does not distinguish the enantiomers, that is, the D- and L-isomers co-elute) [17 (link)] on a system composed of a Shimadzu Nexera X2 U-HPLC (Shimadzu Corp.; Marlborough, MA) coupled to a Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA). Metabolite identities were confirmed using authentic reference standards. Raw data were processed via TraceFinder software (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA). Internal standard peak areas were monitored for quality control and to ensure system performance throughout analyses. Pooled plasma reference samples were also inserted every twenty samples as an additional quality control. Information about the mass to charge ratio and retention time is shown in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolite Extraction from Cells and Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell lysates, MCF10A cells were plated on a six-well plate (3 × 105 per well) 24 h before they were either non-starved or starved for another 24 h. The cells were then incubated with 2.3 μg ml−1 laminin-5 (Kerafast) for 1 h before harvest. Metabolites were harvested by washing with cold PBS, adding 1 ml of ice-cold 80% methanol (LC-MS grade), incubating the cells for 15 min at −80 °C, and scraping the lysates to tubes on dry ice. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation (9,000g, 4 °C, 10 min). A volume of 100 μl of the resulting supernatant was dried using a nitrogen evaporator and resuspended in 100 μl extraction solution (75% acetonitrile, 25% methanol, 0.2% formic acid). The suspension was centrifuged (10,000g, 4 °C, 10 min) and analysed using LC-MS. For plasma, metabolites were extracted by combining 10 μl plasma with 90 μl extraction solution. The suspension was centrifuged (10,000g, 4 °C, 10 min) and the supernatant was analysed using LC-MS.
LC-MS data were acquired using a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography method with positive ion mode mass spectrometry operated on Nexera X2 UHPLC (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Marlborough, MA) coupled to a Q Exactive orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) as described previously32 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolic Profiling of Selenium Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolite profiling was performed on mouse liver and brain tissue samples that were harvested from mice subjected to for five weeks to 0, 0.1, 0.4, 2.25 ppm Se diets. Tissue metabolites were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with high resolution accurate mass profiling. All data were acquired using LC-MS systems comprised of a Nexera X2 U-HPLC (Shimadzu, Marlborough, MA) coupled to either a Q Exactive or Exactive Plus orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA) (Avanesov et al., 2014 (link); Ma et al., 2015 (link)). Raw data from the three nontargeted methods were processed using Progenesis QI software (NonLinear Dynamics) for feature alignment, nontargeted signal detection, and signal integration. Targeted processing of a subset of known metabolites was conducted using TraceFinder 3.3 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Compound identities were confirmed using reference standards and reference samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polyphenol and Amygdalin Analysis by UHPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyphenols and amygdalin were analysed on a Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC coupled with mass spectrometer LCMS 8040 (Shimadzu, Japan) as described in Ben-Othman et al. (2021) (link) with slight modifications. A reverse phase column ACE Excel 3 (C18, PFP, 100 × 2.1 mm; from ACE® Advanced Chromatography Technologies Ltd., Scotland) and pre-column (SecurityGuard ULTRA, C18; from Phenomenex, USA) were used at 40 °C for the separation of individual compounds. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.4 mL/min; the sample size was 1 μL. The mobile phase consisted of 1% formic acid in Milli-Q water (A) and 1% formic acid in methanol (B). Separation was carried out for 38 min under the following conditions: gradient 0–10 min, 10–25% B; 10–15 min, 25–35% B; 15–27 min, 35%–80% 27–30min 80-95 29–34 min isocratic 95% B, and re-equilibration of the system with 10% B 5 min.
Phenolic compounds were identified by comparing the retention times, UV spectra, and parent/daughter ion masses with those of the standard compounds described in Ben-Othman et al. (2021) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mycotoxin Detection and Quantification by LC/MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detection and quantification of mycotoxins were performed with high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass-spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Chromatographic separation was carried out using Nexera X2 UHPLC (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with 100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm Kinetex C18 column, (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The column was maintained at 40 °C and the injection volume was 2 µL. The mobile phase consisted of 2.5 mM ammonium acetate acidified with 0.1% acetic acid (A), and methanol (B). The methanol (B) concentration was raised gradually from 5% to 95% within 8 min, brought back to the initial conditions at 9 min, and allowed to stabilize for 3 min. The mobile phase was delivered at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The LC system was coupled with API 6500 hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada), equipped with a turbo-ion electrospray (ESI) ion source. The mass-spectrometer was operated in scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (sMRM) in both positive and negative mode within a single run. Positive polarity was applied for all analytes except for DON and ZEA. Precursor/quantifier/qualifier ions are specified in Table 4. Source temperature was set at 350 °C, ion-spray voltages at −4500 V (negative mode) and 5000 V (positive mode), curtain gas at 35 arbitrary units (au), nebulizer gas at 60 au, and turbo gas at 40 au.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Serum Amino Acid Analysis after Exercise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples for serum analysis were taken by a medical diagnostic professional according to the experimental protocol at three different time points: 24 h before the run, immediately after the run (within 5 min of finishing the run), and 24 h after the run. The blood was collected in Sarstedt S-Monovette tubes (S-Monovette® Sarstedt AG&Co, Nümbrecht, Germany) containing a coagulation accelerator. The serum was portioned and frozen at −80 °C until analysis.
For the amino acid analysis, we used a modified method developed by Waraksa et al. 2019 [9 (link)]. Serum proteins were first precipitated and derivatized. Quantitative analysis was performed using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC (Shimadzu, Japan)) coupled with an 8050 triple-quadruple detector (Shimadzu, Japan). The raw data were collected, processed, and quantified using LabSolutions LCGC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomics of Polarized T Helper Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro polarized Th17 and Th22 cells were prepared as above. Cells were harvested on day 3, washed with PBS and pellets were snap frozen and stored at −80°C before treatment for detection. Cell profiling was performed leveraging liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method21 (link). A C8-positive platform, which connected a Nexera X2 U-HPLC (Shimadzu Corp) to an Exactive Plus orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), was used to measure polar and non-polar plasma lipids. Internal standard peak areas were monitored for quality control and to ensure system performance throughout analyses. Pooled Th17 and Th22 reference samples were inserted every 20 samples as an additional quality control. Untargeted data were processed using Progenesis QI software (Waters, Milford, MA) and TraceFinder 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for automated LC-MS peak integration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenolic Compound Analysis via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A liquid chromatograph‐mass spectrometer (LC–MS/MS) was used to analyze 18 distinct phenolic compounds. A Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC (Shimadzu, Japan) liquid chromatograph equipped with an InertSustain Swift C18 (2.1 mm*100 mm, 3 μm) column was used, and the system was coupled to an 8050 triple quadruple detector (Shimadzu, Japan) controlled by LabSolution 5.60 SP2 software. Ultra‐pure water was prepared on a Milli‐Q IQ 7000 system (Millipore Company, USA). Propolis samples (SP1–SP6) were extracted by the Reflux Mechanism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Bioactive Compounds via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis was undertaken using a Nexera X2 UHPLC coupled to an 8060 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The LC system was equipped with a Shimpack C18 ODS III (75 mm × 2.0 mm, 10 μm) column maintained at 60°C. Mobile phase A consisted of aqueous ammonium formate (5 mM, pH 3.0) and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in ACN. The run time for each sample was 17.5 min with the gradient: 0–2.5 min (A: B 70:30 v/v), 2.5–11 min (A: B 40:60 v/v), 11–12 min (A: B 5:95 v/v) and this was kept constant until 16 min. The mobile phase returned to initial condition for 1.5 min. The flow rate was 0.3 ml/min and an injection volume of 5 μl was used.
Mass spectrometry (MS) data for HC, C and D4‐HC were acquired in positive electrospray ionisation (ESI+) mode while the quantification of TACA as formate adduct was performed using negative electrospray ionisation (ESI‐) mode, following routine procedures at ARFL. Collision energies were optimised for each of the compounds. The desolvation line and heat block temperature was set to 250 °C and 400 °C, respectively. The nebulising gas flow, heating gas flow and drying gas flow was set to 2.8, 12.0 and 8.0 L/min respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!