The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

206 protocols using excel 2013

1

Data Analysis Using SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained data were entered into a Microsoft Excel 2013 sheet and were analyzed using IBM’s Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (Version 20).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparing Medication Preparation Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were recorded in Microsoft Excel 2013 and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24. Normality of data was checked before analysis based on skewness, kurtosis and normality test in SPSS. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnett T3 tests were used to compare the time and cost needed to prepare medicine through VAS and conventional counter service. Descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage were used to represent the data collected from the survey (e.g.: type of facility, profession, perception of VAS), and mean ± standard deviation was used for continuous data (e.g.: duration of service, time spent doing VAS, score for VAS barriers).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

COVID-19 Severity Predictors Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data entry was made in Microsoft Excel 2013 and analysis was done using SPSS© IBM trial software version 17.0.
Two groups were made, severe (moderate and severe COVID-19) and non-severe group (mild COVID- 19). Bivariate analysis was done to generate an odds ratio for the strength of association between the lab parameters and clinical severity on admission. 95% confidence interval for OR, P value less than 0.05, Chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used for the significance of the test.
The significance between Clinical and Lab parameters with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 disease was done by using ANOVA repeated measures of parametric data and Kruskal–Wallis test for non-parametric data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy for Filariasis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data collected were recorded into a template developed in Microsoft Excel 2013 and later exported to SPSS version 20 (IBM SPSS Statistics 22; Armonk, NY) for statistical analysis. All differences were considered statistically significant at P-values < 0.05. Proportion of Mf positivity was expressed as a percentage of the number examined at different time points of the follow ups. Chi-square test was used to check for significant differences in the positive rates between the screening techniques at different screening time points.
A web-based application described by Lim et al. [49 (link)] and based on Bayesian Latent Class Models (LCM) was used to determine the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)) of the diagnostic tests using microscopy as an imperfect gold standard with the help of a simplified interface of three-tests in one-population model (Walter and Irwig model) [49 (link)]. In brief, Bayesian LCMs estimate accuracies of diagnostic tests based on the true disease status of each patient. Bayesian LCMs do not assume that any diagnostic test or combination of diagnostic tests is perfect [50 (link), 51 ]. Table S1 shows the data input into the Web-based application template.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Seroprevalence of Coronavirus in Baboons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were tabulated using Microsoft Excel 2013 software and analysed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 20 program (SPSS v.20). Descriptive statistics of the body weights of the different age classes of baboons were summarized as means ± s.d., while that of positive, negative and equivocal sera were expressed as percentages, calculated according to the age class and sex of the baboons. To estimate the variation in prevalence of HCoV, CCoV and MERSCoV antibodies in the sampled baboons, two explanatory variables (age class and sex) were tested for statistically significant associations with serological status of the animals, using χ2 test or Fishers exact test. The P-value for statistical significance was set at <0·05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on ADRs according to years, gender, age group, type of reporters, suspected medicines and category of ADRs were described as frequencies and percentages. The analysis was undertaken using Microsoft Excel 2013 and IBM SPSS Version 19.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Hospital Pharmacy Supply Management

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mainly descriptive analyses were performed due to the small sample size, using Excel 2013 and IBM SPSS Statistics 23.The total time spent per week was investigated, as well as the time spent on each step undertaken to manage supply problems and the time spent by employees of the hospital pharmacies. Results were displayed in minutes and relative numbers were presented as percentages. The considered sample size (N) was included in the result.
To check whether the time spent by hospital pharmacists was correlated to the number of beds or the number of employees, the Pearson’s correlation was calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.
From the background information papers, the type and number of supply disruptions and drug shortages were analysed, together with the solutions for drug shortages. Only supply problems for which the question ‘whether or not the supply disruption caused a drug shortage’ was answered, were considered for further analyses. Supply problems were reported according to the WHO ATC-system [28 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical calculations were carried out with the help of the statistical package IBM SPSS 23 and an Excel 2013 spreadsheet. Qualitative variables were presented as counts and percentages, while quantitative variables were described with the help of the arithmetic mean and standard deviation. To check whether quantitative variables came from a normally distributed population, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used. The Mann–Whitney U test and Student’s t-test were used to check the significance of differences between two groups, while the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to check the significance between more than two groups. To predict and check the impact of several factors (independent variables) on dependent variables, multiple linear regression analysis was carried out. To determine the dependence between the strength and direction of variables, correlation analysis was performed by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. In all calculations, the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Research Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses will be performed with the use of Microsoft Excel 2013 and IBM SPSS Statistics v.20 software. Data will be analyzed by descriptive statistics. Demographic and descriptive continuous variables will be expressed as mean (standard deviation, SD) and median values (interquartile range, IQR). Categorical variables will be expressed as percentages. Chi square or Fisher’s exact test will be used for comparison of dichotomous and Mann-Whitney or t-test for continuous variables. Binary logistic regression analysis will be performed in order to identify variables associated with relapses, serious infections, hospitalizations, corticosteroid discontinuation and death.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Leaf Nutrient Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As our experiment used a randomized block design, for each species, we used species‐specific linear mixed model analysis to examine the effects of N, P, and N × P on the leaf soluble sugar and starch concentrations, and N, P, and N:P ratios for each species in 2012, 2015 and 2017. Given the variation among species, the linear mixed models were used to test the difference on the soluble sugar and starch, N, P concentrations and N:P ratios. In these models, species (S), N addition (N), and P addition (P) were considered as the fixed effects, and block, nested by sampling year, was included in the models as a random factor. Relative effects (RE) were quantified by the ratio of the variable in the experimental group (+N, +P, +NP) to the control group (CK), minus one (In Figure 1). All data analyses were performed in Excel 2013 and IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0. Results are reported as significant when p < .05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!