The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using seeblue plus2 pre stained

1

Lipopeptide Inhibition of α-Hemolysin Oligomerization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate if purified lipopeptides prevent hemolysis by impairing α-hemolysin oligomerization, an SDS-PAGE was performed as described below. The active lipopeptide was mixed with 2.5 µg of alpha-hemolysin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) at 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mg/mL. To promote oligomerization, 5 mM of deoxycholate was added to the samples, and the mixtures were incubated at 22 °C for 20 min27 (link). TruPAGE LDS sample buffer 4× (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was then added to the samples at 1× final concentration and the mixtures were incubated at 50 °C for 10 min27 (link). Twenty-five µL of each reaction mixture was loaded onto NuPAGE 12% Bis–Tris Gel (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, EUA). Ten µL of the SeeBlue Plus2 Pre-stained (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, EUA) were applied as the protein standard. The gel was run at 100 V for 50 min using MES buffer (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, EUA). Gels were stained using the EZblue Gel Staining Reagent (Sigma, Missouri, EUA) overnight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zinc-Induced Fluorescence of Bilin Chromophores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples equivalent to OD620 = 0.5 were analysed on NuPAGE 12% Bis-Tris (Invitrogen) protein gel set to run at 150 V for 1 h. SeeBlue Plus2 Pre-Stained (Invitrogen) protein standard was used as a ladder. The gels were incubated in 100 mM zinc sulfate solution for 10 min and visualized under UV light for the presence of zinc-induced fluorescence of bilin chromophores (Raps, 1990 (link)). The gels were further stained with 1% (v/v) Coomassie Blue in acetic acid/methanol. For the bands extracted and purified from sucrose gradients (section 2.9) Coomassie staining was not able to clearly visualize the bands. Therefore, the gel was re-stained using silver staining as described in Heukeshoven and Dernick (1985) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Venom Protein Separation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mixture containing 10 μL of venom sample (2 mg/ml of crude venom or 1 mg/ml of HPLC fractions), 5 μl of 2× sample buffer (Novex, Invitrogen) and 1μl of 10× sample reducing agent NUPAGE (Invitrogen™, USA) was heated to 100 °C for 5 min and loaded on to a10-20% Tricine acrylamide gels (Invitrogen™, USA). Samples were separated for 90 min at 125 V. Gels were stained with Simply Blue Safe Stain (Invitrogen) and distained overnight in water. Molecular Weight Standards (See Blue Plus2 Prestained, Invitrogen, USA) were used to estimate molecular masses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transfection Optimization for Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TO cells were split 2:3 the day before transfection. The cells were transfected at 80% confluence using the 10 μl Neon transfection system (Life technologies) with buffer R and at a pulse voltage of 1200, pulse width 20 ms, 2 pulses. 450,000 cells were used for each transfection. For each well a total of 350 ng plasmid were used. After transfection the cells were seeded in 48-well plates in triplicates with MEM growth medium containing 12% FBS without antibiotics, and incubated with CO2 at 20 °C. Cells were harvested 48 h post transfection in 40 μl 2× SDS buffer. 15–20 μl of the samples were loaded in each well of a precast 4–12% gradient NuPAGE Novex Bis-Tris gel and subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) with 1× MOPS (Invitrogen) for 45 min at 200 V and 120 mA. The markers MagicMark™ XP (Invitrogen) and SeeBlue Plus2 Prestained (Invitrogen) were simultaneously loaded for molecular weight estimations. Western blotting of the separated proteins to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) was performed using the Invitrogen NuPAGE system according to the manufacturer's instructions. An anti-Flag antibody (1:3000 dilution) (Sigma) for detection of Flag-tagged proteins were used and goat anti-mouse-HRP antibody (1:5000) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as a secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Quantification and SDS-PAGE Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were quantified by the Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The adsorption was measured with a Tecan Infinite M1000 plate reader using bovine serum albumin (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) for a calibration curve.
After quantification, the proteins were separated with SDS-PAGE and stained by Silver Staining according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. A total of 2 µg protein in 26 µL total volume was mixed with 4 µL NuPage Reducing Agent and 10 mL of NuPage LDS Sample Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sample was loaded on a 10% Bis-Tris-Protein Gel using SeeBlue Plus2 Pre-Stained (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) as a molecular marker and NuPage MES SDS Running Buffer. Gels were stained with Pierce Silver Stain Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Separation of Hard Corona Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hard corona proteins were separated using 10% Bis-Tris-Protein Gels and NuPAGE MES and SDS Running Buffer. Proteins (8 µg in 26 µL) were mixed with NuPage Reducing Agent (4 µL) and NuPage LDS Samples Buffer (10 µL). The gel was run for 1.5 h at 100 V with SeeBlue Plus2 Pre-Stained (Invitrogen) as molecular marker. Gels were stained with SimplyBlue SafeStain overnight and destained with water (all reagents Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!