The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using d8 advance instrument

1

Characterization of PMIA with ALD Coating

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM‐6510LV, JEOL Co. Ltd., Japan) was employed to observe the morphologies and microcosmic structures of the samples. The elemental composition of PMIA with and without ALD coating was analyzed using a coupled energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy detector (QX200, Bruker). The thickness of the ALD coating on the PMIA surface was characterized by using a TEM (JEOL JEM‐2010) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The PMIA cross‐sectional image was obtained by using a focused ion beam (Helios Lab, operating at 30 kV, USA) technology. The chemical composition of the surface of the PMIA was analyzed by XPS (SPM‐9700, SHIMADZU, Co. Ltd.). The characterizations were conducted at 15 kV using monochromatic Al‐Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation under ultrahigh vacuum (2 × 10−9 mbar). XRD was used to detect the crystal structure of PMIA and ALD PMIA using a D8‐Advance instrument (Bruker). The analysis was conducted by Cu‐Kα radiation in the 2θ range between 10° and 80° at a scan rate of 1° min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of N-Vinylcarbazole-Based Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N-vinylcarbazole (98%), HSiCl3 (99%), and mesitylene (97%) were purchased from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Analytical-grade ethanol (99.5%) and hydrofluoric acid (40% aqueous solution) were received from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (SCRC; Shanghai, China). All reagents were used as purchased without further purification. The XRD spectrum was performed on a Bruker D8 Advance instrument (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). TEM images were obtained on a JEM-2100 transmission electron microscope with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV (JEOL, Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The FTIR spectra were measured by a Bruker VECTOR 22 spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) with KBr pellets. The PL and excitation spectra were collected by a Hitachi F-4600 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Ltd., Chiyoda-ku, Japan). The UV-vis absorption spectra were measured by a Shimadzu UV-2700 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The PL lifetime was obtained on a Zolix Omni-λ 300 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Zolix Instruments Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Crystallinity Index Determination of Chitin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD analysis was performed using a D8 ADVANCE instrument with DAVINCI (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) according to the method described by Yen et al. [32 (link)]. The Cu radiation (40 kV, 40 mA) was used as the X-ray source with an LYNXEYE XE detector. The collected scanned data range of 2θ was 5–50°. The crystallinity index of the chitin samples was calculated using the following formula [33 (link)]:
where Ia is the intensity at 2θ = 16° and Ic is the intensity at 2θ = 20°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PVP-Mediated Nanomaterial Synthesis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP24000) was purchased from Aladdin Reagents. The manganese chloride tetrahydrate (MnCl2·4H2O, 99.99%) and 2-methylimidazole (98%) were both purchased from Macklin Inc. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Tsingke Biotech. Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China) with the sequence information shown in Table 1. Ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ⋅cm, 25°C) was used to prepare all solutions. All other chemicals used in this study were of analytical reagent grade and were used without further purification. The CRISPR/Cas12a assay kit purchasing from EZassay Biotech. Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, China) was used in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines unless otherwise stated. The ultrasonication cleaner, Elmasonic S 60, was purchased from Elma Co. Ltd., Germany. The centrifuge used in this work was a Sigma 3-30k (Sigma, Germany). Fluorescence photos were taken by Quantum ST5 (Vilber Lourmat Co. Ltd., France) and the corresponding quantitative measurements were performed with an LightCycler 480II (Roche Ltd., Switzerland). HRTEM images and EDS Mapping data were both taken under a Talos F200X microscope (FEI Electronics, U.S.A.). AFM images were obtained with Demension icon and XRD data were collected using a D8 Advance instrument (both Bruker, Germany). UV-VIS-NIR curve was measured by UH4150 (Hitachi, Japan). Zeta potential was taken by an Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Characterization of Lamotrigine Hydrate Form A

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 9

10 parts by weight of lamotrigine particles having a particle size (D90) of 8 μm and 3 parts by weight of xanthan gum were added to 1000 parts by weight of purified water. It was dispersed uniformly, and then allowed to stand at 4° C. for 24 hours to obtain a suspension comprising lamotrigine hydrate form A. The suspension was filtered to obtain the lamotrigine hydrate form A.

The obtained lamotrigine hydrate form A was analyzed by XRPD. The XRPD spectrum of the lamotrigine hydrate form A has a series of characteristic peaks at diffraction angles (2θ) of 11.5±0.2°, 13.4±0.2°, 15.0±0.2°, 16.5±0.2°, 19.2±0.2°, 26.9±0.2° and 27.7±0.2°, and no characteristic peak at diffraction angles (2θ) of 15.9±0.2°, 20.5±0.2°, 23.5±0.2°, 28.2±0.2° and 30.7±0.2°.

The obtained lamotrigine hydrate form A was quantitatively analyzed by XRPD. Al2O3 was selected as the reference material, and XRPD was performed using a Bruker D8 advance instrument under voltage 40 kV, current of 40 mV, step of 0.02 degrees, and a scanning speed: of 0.1 seconds/step. The purity of lamotrigine hydrate form A was measured as 97.7% (w/w). It has an XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 1, and an appearance on microscope shown in FIG. 2.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Analysis of Pretreated Cotton Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FTIR spectra were recorded using a Nicolet Magna 560 FTIR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with a diamond attenuated total reflectance.
X-ray diffraction analysis was performed on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE instrument with copper target radiation. The acceleration voltage was 50 kV, the scanning range 2θ was from 10° to 50°, the scanning speed was 5°/min, and the tube current was 40 mA. Crystallinity was calculated according to the following formula.
CrI=[I200IamI200]×100
In the formula, I200 is the peak intensity of the diffraction of the main crystal plane at 22.7°; Iam is the diffraction intensity of the amorphous region at Angle 2θ close to 18°.
The morphology of the pretreated cotton fibers in different growth stages was observed using a JSM-7500F scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 15 kV.
TEM observation on the CNFs was performed using Thermo Fisher FEI Quanta FEG 450 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 120 KV acceleration voltage. A drop (5 µL) of diluted CNFs slurry was dropped on a carbon-coated electron microscope grid, and then negatively stained with 1 wt.% phosphotungstic acid solution to enhance the contrast of the image. The size of the nanofibrilated cellulose was measured by transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Nanoparticle Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction
(XRD) patterns of lyophilized samples were recorded using a Tensor
27 spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) and a D8 ADVANCE instrument (Bruker,
Germany). The hydrodynamic particle size and the zeta potential of
NPs was performed by a particle size analyzer (Zetasizer, Malvern,
UK) at 25 °C. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images
were acquired on HT7700 TEM (Hitachi, Japan) at an acceleration voltage
of 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Bruker D8 Advance instrument was used for X-ray diffraction (XRD) study. The Jeol JEM-1010 electron microscope with iTEM software was used for the TEM study. High-resolution TEM images were recorded with Jeol JEM 2100 Electron Microscope. A JEOL JSM-6100 microscope was used for both SEM and EDX studies. The DeltaNu advantage 532™ Raman instrument was used for Raman spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Advanced Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fluorescence spectra were obtained by Synergy H1 full-function microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) images were obtained using a Talos F200X electron microscope. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR, Nicolet Instruments, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectra (400–4000 cm−1) were obtained on IS10 spectrometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was carried out by ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer. Fluorescence lifetime was recorded via FLS1000 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, Livingston, UK). X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) analysis using a D8 ADVANCE instrument using Cu Kα (λ = 0.15405 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained by a Bruker D8 ADVANCE instrument using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15405 nm, 40 KV × 60 mA) from 10° to 80° (2θ) with a scanning rate of 0.02°/s. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was obtained by a Thermo ESCALAB 250XI with a monochromated Al Ka X-ray source. A Bruker ALPHA-T Fourier transform infrared spectrometer was used to record the Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) of the samples, with a range from 400 to 4000 cm−1 using the KBr pellet at room temperature. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) measurement was used to determine the specific surface area of samples (Quantachrome Instruments Quadrasorb SI, United States Quantachrome Co., Ltd, Boulder, CO, USA). Using a 100 kV accelerating voltage, a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM-6700) was used to characterize the morphologies of the samples. A UV-vis spectrophotometer was used to generate diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) (SHIMADZU, UV-2550). Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was performed at room temperature using a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!