The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

60 protocols using conditioning chamber

1

Contextual Fear Conditioning in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For contextual fear conditioning, mice handled for three days (3 min/day) were placed in a conditioning chamber (15.9 x 14 x 12.7 cm; Med Associates, St. Albans, Vermont) for 3 min, footshocked (1s/1mA) and retained in the chamber for 2 min (immediate freezing) (38) . Fear memory was tested as freezing behavior, which was defined as a complete cessation of all movement except for respiration, in the same conditioning chamber for 4 min 2 h or 24 h after trainingusing Video Freeze Software (Med Associates) (Fig. 1A). Naïve mice were handled but neither exposed to the conditioning chamber nor shocked, context groups were placed in the chamber without receiving footshock and shocked groups were shocked and immediately returned to their home cages. For biochemical and immunohistochemical analyses mice were sacrificed 15 min after context training or memory retention by dislocation or a lethal dose of pentobarbital, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nose Poke Conditioning in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were tested using illuminated Med-Associates conditioning chambers (Georgia, VT, USA) with 2 or 3 nose poke recesses and a separate magazine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Conditioning and Reactivation of Tone Fear Memory in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were conditioned and tested individually in two identical conditioning chambers (MedAssociates, VT) described previously (Lee et al. 2019 (link)). They were initially habituated to the conditioning chamber for 1 h. On the next day, they received a further 20-min habituation, followed by a single presentation of a single 30-s, 1.5-kHz tone, co-terminating with a 1-s (or 0.5-s), 0.4-mA footshock. There was a 2-min recovery period following the footshock delivery. Twenty-four hours after training, the tone fear memory was reactivated by re-presenting the tone once for 60 s (the longer duration aiming to maximise prediction error) (Fernandez et al. 2016 (link)), after a 60-s pre-CS period. Twenty-four hours after reactivation, conditioned freezing to the tone was assessed in a session identical to reactivation.
For the extinction experiment, all procedures were the same (with the 1-s footshock delivery) apart from the session 24 h after training. Rats were exposed to ten 60-s tone presentations, after a 60-s pre-CS period and with 60-s intervals between each tone presentation (Lee et al. 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pavlovian and Instrumental Conditioning in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats received Pavlovian and instrumental training in Med Associates conditioning chambers, as described previously (58 –60 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Operant Conditioning Behavioral Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All behavioral procedures were conducted in conditioning chambers (15.9 × 14 × 12.7 cm; Med Associates), each enclosed within a sound-attenuating and light-resistant cubicle. The conditioning chamber was fitted with a recessed magazine situated in the center of one side wall, which dispensed 10% sucrose solution serving as the unconditioned stimulus (US). An infrared beam detected head entries into the magazine. The house light was situated in the side panel and was on for the duration of each training or test session. A mechanical relay served as an auditory (click) conditioned stimulus (CS; Med Associates). Initiation and running of behavioral protocols, including the recording of head entries into the food magazine, was performed using Med-PC IV (Med Associates; RRID:SCR_012156).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fear Conditioning and Extinction in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the commencement of drinking, on PND 60, mice that took part in intermittent access drinking were fear conditioned in a novel context. This context consisted of four identical conditioning chambers (32.4 × 25.4 × 21.6 cm; Med-Associates, Inc., Georgia, VT) housed inside sound-attenuating cabinets. The chambers were distinct from the PND 17 footshock and isolation contexts in several ways: the room was dark except lit by red lamps, the room smelled of vinegar, there were black Plexiglass triangular inserts within the chamber, and the floor had staggered stainless steel rods (18 rods, two rows, .05 cm vertically apart). Mice were placed into the fear conditioning chamber and received one footshock (0.25 mA, 1s) 180 seconds following placement within the chamber. Thirty seconds following footshock, mice were returned to the homecage. On PND 90 mice were administered a fear extinction session in this context. Freezing behavior was measured to test fear memory (data not shown).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Incentive Salience Transfer via PCA Task

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The goal of this experiment was to assess if exposure to TMT would later increase the transfer of incentive salience towards reward cues using a PCA task. PCA was assessed in conditioning chambers (Med Associates, St. Alban, VT) located within sound-attenuating cabinets equipped with an exhaust fan to provide ventilation and mask outside noise. Chambers were equipped with a retractable lever on the back left side of the chamber and a cue light was located above the lever. Next to the lever was a port containing an infrared beam to detect entries and a liquid receptacle connected to a syringe pump for delivery of sucrose (20%, w/v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Operant Conditioning Setup for Rat Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the onset of PCA testing, rats were handled daily for 3 d and given approximately seven banana-flavored sucrose pellets (45 mg; BioServ). Rats were tested in conditioning chambers (20.5 × 24.1 cm floor area, 20.2 cm high; MED Associates Inc.). Each chamber contained a food magazine port located 2.5 cm above the floor in the center of the intelligence panel, a red house light located on the wall opposite the food magazine port (on throughout training sessions), and a retractable lever (Med Associates) located 2.5 cm to the left or right of the food receptacle and 6 cm above the floor. This retractable lever was illuminated when extended with a white LED light placed inside the lever house. For a lever press to be recorded, a force of ∼15 g was needed. The pellet dispenser (Med Associates) delivered one 45-mg banana-flavored sucrose pellet (Bio-Serv) into the food magazine port at a time. A head entry was recorded each time a rat broke the infrared photobeam located inside the food magazine port. Each conditioning chamber was placed in a sound-reducing enclosure and a ventilating fan served as background noise. Data collection was controlled by Med-PC IV Behavioral Control Software Suite.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optogenetic Neuromodulation in Operant Conditioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
120 min behavioral sessions were conducted >4 weeks post-surgery in conditioning chambers (Med Associates Inc.) contained within sound-attenuating cubicles. Session start was indicated to the rat by the illumination of a chamber light and the onset of low-volume white noise (65 dB) to mask external sounds. Two nosepoke ports, designated “active” and “inactive”, were positioned on the left chamber wall; each had three LED lights at the rear. A response at the active nosepoke port resulted in optical stimulation (20 pulses, 5 ms duration, 20 Hz, 473 nm) on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule, with the exception that a new stimulation train could not be earned until any ongoing train had finished. The LED lights in the recess of the active port were illuminated concurrent with stimulation. We chose to include a response-contingent cue in our experimental design because such cues have been show to facilitate robust operant responding over long periods in drug self-administration studies [24] (link). Responses at the inactive nosepoke port were recorded but had no consequence. During the first training session, both nosepoke ports were baited with a crushed cereal treat to facilitate initial investigation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Operant Conditioning Chamber Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Operant training and testing took place in conditioning chambers (24.0 × 31.0 × 21.0 cm high; Med Associates). The front wall of the chamber contained the food opening and two retractable levers (4.5 × 0.1 cm) that extended 1.8 cm into the chamber. Each lever was located 1.0 cm from the side wall and 2.0 cm from the floor. Only the left lever was used in this experiment. A rectangular food opening (5.0 × 4.5 cm) was located 9.5 cm from the side wall and 0.5 cm from the floor. The front wall also contained two white cue lights above the levers and a tone generator (2 kHz, 15 dB over ambient noise) above the left lever. Only the white cue light above the left lever was used in this experiment. A red house light (24-V) was located in the back wall and 2.0 cm below the ceiling. Operant chambers were contained in sound-attenuating enclosures. A ventilating fan masked noises from outside the enclosures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!