The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using xience prime

1

PCI Trial for Female Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The design of the SPIRIT Women study was reported elsewhere.[12 (link), 13 (link)] The trial was conceived as a substudy of the main SPIRIT Women study that was registered in 2007 (NCT00496938). Subsequent changes in the original protocol were made and the randomized study was registered a separate one in 2010 (NCT01182428). Complete study protocol is available among Supporting Information files (S1 Study Protocol).
455 female patients admitted for PCI at 25 centers (22 in Europe and 3 in South America), between September 2008 and December 2009, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive DP-EES (Xience V and Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or DP-SES (Cypher Select, Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA). The trial was funded by Abbott Vascular. The study complied with the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board at each participating center (S1 Table). Eligible patients provided written, informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

G2-DES Implantation and Restenosis Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All enrolled patients received G2-DESs implantations in the catheterization centre. The type of G2-DESs included zotarolimus-eluting stents (Endeavor and Endeavor Resolute; Medtronic Vascular, USA), domestic sirolimus-eluting stents (Firebird2; MicroPort Medical, China), everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V and Xience Prime; Abbott Vascular, USA, Promus and Promus Element; Boston Scientific, USA). Stent implantation was performed according to current practice guidelines, and stents were selected by experienced interventional cardiologists. During the procedure, patients received a bolus of 100 IU/kg heparin with a repeated bolus of 2000 IU heparin to maintain the activated clotting time of ≥ 300 s. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/day was administered) and clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg/day for at least 12 months). When ISR was diagnosed, patients were treated with re-DES implantation. Procedural success was defined as follows: reduction of stenosis to less than 10% residual narrowing; thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade III; improvement in ischaemic symptoms; and no major procedure related complications [7 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Coronary Angiography and DES Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coronary angiography was performed with standard techniques. Quantitative coronary angiographic analyses were performed in optimal projections using the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System II (Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The Netherlands) by an experienced analyst who was unaware of the clinical status of the patients.
Before the procedure, aspirin and 300~600 mg of clopidogrel were administered to all patients. Heparin was administered during the procedure according to standard practice. All patients were recommended to maintain lifelong doses of aspirin (100mg/day) and clopidogrel (75mg/day) for at least 1 year after the index PCI. Patients received DES treatment using sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ, USA), paclitaxel-eluting stents (TAXUS Express or Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA; Coroflex Please, B. Braun, Germany), everolimus-eluting stents (Promus Element, Boston Scientific; Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and zotarolimus-eluting stents (Endeavor, Medtronic Vascular, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Outcomes of Second-Generation DES in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We combined data from 7 prospective, randomized trials enrolling patients with second‐generation DES that were maintained at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (New York, NY) in which treated lesion ACC/AHA class was determined at an angiographic core laboratory. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Clinical follow‐up was performed for up to 5 years. The designs of the trials have been previously described and are summarized in Supplemental Table S1.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 As we sought to study contemporary DES outcomes, only patients in which a single lesion was treated with a contemporary second‐generation DES (Xience V or Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA; Promus, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA; Nobori, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan; and Resolute Integrity, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) were included in the analysis. Patients were censored at time of first event or at last follow‐up time, whichever occurred first. Each trial was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at the respective participating centers, and all patients signed written informed consent before randomization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparison of DES, BMS, and UHS-Treated Stents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We compared contemporary DES and BMS with UHS-treated stents. Our main analyses considered the Integrity BMS and the Resolute Integrity® DES (3.0×18 mm platforms; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Pooled analyses using additional DES and BMS (XIENCE PRIME® vs. MULTI-LINK 8™; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA; PROMUS™ vs. Omega™; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) assessed consistency. For reporting, UHS, DES, and BMS labels reference the main treated-Integrity/Resolute/Integrity comparisons, respectively, unless indicated.
All UHS were prepared by surface treatment of corresponding BMS6 (link). The treatment reduces nickel and cobalt concentrations in the surface oxide and simultaneously removes organic contamination, leading to ultra-hydrophilic surfaces. The water contact angle on CoCr discs fell from 75°±5° to 10°±5° after treatment (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Coronary Stent Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stents for implantation were chosen from first-generation DES durable polymer
based [Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) (Taxus, Boston Scientific Corporation,
Maple Grove, MN, USA) or Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (Cypher, Cordis, USA)] or
second-generation DES [Everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Promus, Boston Scientific
Corporation; Xience, Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA),
Zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Endeavor, Resolute, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN,
USA), and Biolimus-eluting stent (BES) (Biolimus A9, Biosensors International,
Switzerland)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparison of Five Stent Platforms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We compared five platforms: Omega (Boston Scientific), Multilink 8 (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, California, USA), Integrity (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA), Biomatrix Flex (Biosensors, Singapore) and Promus Premier (Boston Scientific). The former three bare metal stents were chosen as they are the identical platforms to the drug-eluting Promus and Taxus Element (Boston Scientific), Xience Prime (Abbott Vascular,) and Resolute Integrity (Medtronic) stents, respectively. The Biomatrix Flex and Promus Premier stents do not have bare metal equivalents. We chose 3.5 mm diameter stents for all platforms to avoid testing a mixture of small and large vessel platforms that exist for 3 mm diameter stents depending on the manufacturer. Stent length was greater than 18 mm in all cases. Table 1 shows the stent platform structures and characteristics for the stents used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Stent Coating Enhances Endothelial Permeability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Everolimus eluting stents (EES, n = 5, Xience Prime, 3.0 × 15 mm, Abbott Vascular, CA, strut thickness 81 µm) and customized integrin αvβ3 ligand coated stents (ICS, n = 5, 3.0 × 15 mm, strut thickness 80 µm) were randomly allocated to iliac arteries of male hypercholesterolemic New Zealand White Rabbits (n = 5) after 7 days for a duration of 12 weeks, in accordance to study 1. As coating ligand, the cyclic RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptide, c(RGDfK), a highly selective ligand for the αvβ3 integrin was functionalized by the incorporation of a spacer-linker unit at the lysine residue. After plasma treatment of the stents, they were immersion coated with the functionalized peptide, c(RGDfK) Ahx Ahx 1 (4 isothiocyanatophenyl)thioureidyl, facilitating anchorage via the isothiocyanate group to the amine groups of chitosan forming a thiourea link. Prior to that, ProKinetic Energy BMS were spray-coated with chitosan-polylactide copolymer (also see supplemental material, section „Coating of stents with αvβ3 integrin ligand”). Endothelial permeability was assessed by FITC-dextran (250/500 kDa) injected 1 hour prior to euthanasia at day 91 (after 13 weeks). After euthanasia and tissue harvest, stented vessel (n = 10; 5 EES and 5 ICS) were bisected longitudinally and analysed using confocal microscopy (CM), followed by scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Swine Study of Neointimal Tissue After EES Implantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 15 swine (weighing 25 to 30 kg) were studied for 6 months to evaluate neointimal tissue serially following EES implantation. Two stent types were implanted: EES (Xience Prime, 3.0 × 12 mm, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) as a target stent and BMS (Blazer, 3.0 × 13 mm, OrbusNeich, Hong Kong) as a control stent. Each stent was deployed in the left anterior descending artery or right coronary artery. At the time of stent deployment, each stent was systematically randomized to each coronary artery in each animal. Follow-up angiography with OCT was serially performed 1, 3, and 6 months after stent implantation. All animals received humane care in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and “The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” formulated by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Research [8 ]. This study was approved by the local institutional animal care and use committee (Medi Kinetics, MK-IACUC: 111027-0001 and Cardiovascular Production Evaluation Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Evaluation of Durable and Bioresorbable Coronary Stents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different types of DESs were implanted into 17 mini-pigs (Japan Farm Co., Ltd., Kagoshima, Japan) (Fig. 1): DP-EESs (XIENCE Prime™; Abbott Vascular, Tokyo, Japan; n = 8), BP-SESs (Ultimaster™; Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan; n = 8), and BMSs (Kaname; Terumo Corp.; n = 8), with 1 of each type implanted into each pig (1 stent per vessel). The DP-EES is an everolimus-eluting stent with a uniform coating of durable fluoropolymer (polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) [26] . The BP-SES has an abluminal coating with a matrix containing sirolimus and poly (DL-lactide)-co-caprolactone [27] (link), [28] (link). The BP is completely metabolized into carbon dioxide and water within 3–4 months. The number of animals required was determined from previous work [29] (link). All animals were sacrificed at 9 months to investigate the early vascular response. The stents were then histologically examined. This study was approved and performed according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of R&D Headquarters at Terumo Corp.

Study Flow Chart. All animals underwent OFDI at either 1 or 3 months and at 9 months. After euthanasia at 9 months, stents were histologically investigated to analyze the vascular response and its maturity. One animal died before the euthanasia in each of the 2 BMS groups.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!