The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Millex gv filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Ireland, Germany

The Millex GV filter is a sterile, disposable syringe-driven filter unit designed for filtration of aqueous solutions. It features a 0.22 μm hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane that removes particulates, bacteria, and other contaminants from the solution.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

45 protocols using millex gv filter

1

Standardized IFNα-2a Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IFNα-2a (c = 1.35 mg/mL) was kindly provided by Roche Diagnostics GmbH, formulated
in 25 mM ammonium acetate pH 5 with 120 mM sodium chloride. If not
stated otherwise, IFNα-2a samples were dialyzed into the desired
condition using Slide-A-Lyzer 3500 MWCO dialysis cassettes (Thermo
Fisher) as described in Pohl et al.29 (link) The
protein concentration after dialysis was measured using a NanoDrop
8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). If not stated otherwise, all
measurements were performed at a protein concentration of 1 mg/mL
obtained by dilution into the final solution condition. Filtration
of the sample and buffer was performed using Luer-Lok syringes (BD)
and 0.22 μm Millex-GV filter (Merck) or 0.2 μm Whatman
Anotop 10 filter (GE Healthcare Life Science) syringe filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Far-UV CD Spectroscopy of Hst5 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD spectra in the far-UV region
(190–260 nm, depending on the absorbance of the sample) were
obtained using a Jasco J-7715 CD spectrometer, where the temperature
was controlled using a PTC-348WI Peltier control system (Hachioji,
Tokyo, Japan). The samples of Hst5 were prepared by dialyzing the
protein powder against Milli-Q H2O (three changes) followed
by dialysis against the specific buffer (three changes). The dialysis
was completed in dialysis tubing with a 500 Da molecular weight cutoff
(Biotech), performed at room temperature while stirring continuously.
The samples were subsequently diluted in the dialysis buffer yielding
a final protein concentration in the range of 0.2–0.25 mg/mL.
Prior to each measurement, the samples were filtered through a Millex-GV
filter with a 0.22 μm pore size (Merck Millipore Ltd., Ireland)
into a quartz cuvette with a 0.1 cm path length and a total volume
of approximately 400 μL. The temperature was set using the Peltier
system and allowed to equilibrate for 10 min. For all measurements,
a scan rate of 20 nm/min was used, with a 2 s response time and a
2.0 nm bandwidth. Each temperature measurement consisted of an average
of five scans. The background spectra, consisting of the dialysis
buffer, were collected under similar conditions for each temperature
and subtracted from the sample spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Trace Metal Profiling of Phytoplankton

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after the addition of the phytoplankton stock cultures to the different treatments, subsamples (2 mL) were pipetted from each treatment for later assessment of trace metal concentrations via Q-ICP-MS. These subsamples were filtered (0.22 µM, Millex-GV filter, Merck, NZ) then admixed with 14 M HNO3 (20 µL). Additional subsamples (2 mL) were also taken at the end of the experiment to investigate trace metal uptake by phytoplankton and to account for any trace metal contamination that may have been introduced by the sub-sampling of cultures for growth measurements during the experiment. All subsamples were stored at room temperature prior to trace metal concentration analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Purification of Bacteriophages from Ganges River

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BPs were isolated by using the traditional enrichment method [29 (link)]. The water samples (2 mL, collected from the Ganges River) were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min to remove debris and coarse material. The supernatant was then serially passed through membrane filters with pore sizes of 0.45 μm and 0.22 μm (Millex-GV Filter, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) [30 (link)]. The processed water samples were then dropped on lawned A. baumannii bacterial Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) petri dishes and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After incubation, the petri dishes were examined for the presence of lytic bacteriophage plaques and harvested with TMG buffer. The culturing and harvesting procedures were repeated until a total bacterial clearance and a higher BP (BPABΦ1) titer were obtained. The BPs were then purified by a single sequential plaque isolation method using a double-layer agar overlay technique (DLAO) [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were grown to approximately 80% confluence, washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and cultured in AIM V serum-free medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 or 3 days. Exosomes were collected from the medium by centrifugation. In brief, the medium was collected and sequentially centrifuged at 300×g for 10 min, 2000×g for 20 min, and 10,000×g for 30 min, and then filtered through a 0.22 μm Millex-GV filter (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) to remove cells, cellular debris, and large EVs. The medium was then centrifuged at 210,000×g for 70 min using a Beckman L-70K ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments, Brea, CA, USA) with an SW 41 Ti swinging-bucket rotor (Beckman Instruments) [24 (link)]. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed twice with PBS. The pellet was resuspended in PBS and stored at −80 °C. Protein content was measured using a micro BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The exosomes were characterized using tunable resistive pulse sensing with a qNano instrument (Meiwafosis Co., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cellular Uptake of Alexa647-siRNA LNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT26 and SKOV3‐luc cells were seeded into a 24‐well plate at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin at pH 6.5 was prepared by the addition of diluted HCl, followed by filtration through a Millex‐GV Filter, 0.22 μM (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). After 24 h incubation, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium (pH 7.4 and 6.5) containing Alexa647‐siGL3‐encapsulated LNPs at a final siRNA concentration of 100 nM, followed by additional 2 and 6 h incubations. Subsequently, cells were washed twice using D‐PBS(−), detached with 150 μl of trypsin/EDTA (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and suspended in 350 μl of the medium. The fluorescence intensity of cells was measured by flow cytometry (FCM) (Guava® easyCyte™, Malvern, UK) (λexem = 642/661 nm). In total, 3000 cells were acquired for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of sEVs from HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sEVs of the HEK293T cell were isolated according to the protocol that was reported previously (Lim et al., 2020 (link), 2021 (link)). After 4 days of culturing, cell‐conditioned medium was collected and subjected to differential centrifugation to remove cells, debris, and large EVs. Then, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22‐μm Millex‐GV filter (Merck Millipore, MA, USA) to generate a final pre‐cleared cell conditioned medium, known as the 10K sup. After that, a MagCapture Exosome Isolation Kit PS (Wako, Osaka, Japan) was used following to the manufacturer's manual to purify the sEVs from the 10K sup. The purified sEVs were kept in a dialysis membrane (3500 MWCO) for overnight dialysis in PBS. NanoSIGHT LM10 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) was used to perform nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) to measure the sEV concentration. The sEV purification process follows the Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicle 2018 (MISEV2018) guidelines (Théry et al., 2018 (link)) because we uploaded the protocol to the EV‐TRACK knowledgebase in our earlier study (Lim et al., 2021 (link)) (EV‐TRACK ID: EV210256).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Novel Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our experiments, we used colorectal adenocarcinoma HT29 (ATCC HTB-38), cervical adenocarcinoma cells HeLa (ATCC CRM-CCL2), and osteosarcoma MG63 (ATCC CRL-1427). The cells were maintained in Dulbeco’s Modified Medium (DMEM): F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For the in vitro evaluation of their cytotoxicity, the new derivatives were solubilized in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and filtered with 0.22 µm Millex-GV Filter (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). For cytotoxicity kinetics, the IncuCyte® S3 Live-Cell Analysis System (Sartorius, AG, Goettingen, Germany) was used. Briefly, 2 × 104 cells seeded in 96 well plates were treated with the new derivatives in a concentration ranging between 500 μg/mL and 3.9 μg/mL. The plates were placed in the IncuCyte® S3 Live-Cell Analysis System, and five images per well were taken every six h over a 72-h period and then processed, according to kit recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of PPy Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of PPy were extracted according to ISO 10993-12 with the following modification: 0.05 g PPy per 1 mL of cultivation medium was used instead of the ISO-defined ratio of 0.2 g polymer per 1 mL. The extraction was conducted in chemically inert closed containers using aseptic techniques at 37 ± 1 °C under stirring for 24 h. Subsequently, the extract was separated from the polymer powder by centrifugation at 1000 g for 15 min followed by the second centrifugation of supernatant under the same conditions. The parent extracts (100%) were used for the testing of cytotoxicity according to the ISO 10 993-5 protocol. The parent 100% extracts were diluted in complete medium to obtain a series of dilutions. All extracts were used within 24 h. Prior to in vitro testing, the extracts the extracts were sterilized by sterile filtration through a 0.22 μm Millex GV filter (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). All tests were performed in four separate sets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Radiosynthesis of [11C]MRB, a PET Radiotracer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radioactive 11C was generated by the 14N(p, α)11C nuclear reaction using a cyclotron. [11C]CH3I was prepared from [11C]CO2 according to the conventional method. The 11C methylation of (2S,3S)-Desethylreboxetine to [11C]MRB, HPLC purification and formulation were performed using an automated synthesis system (CUPID C-11-BII, Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Tokyo, Japan). Thus, obtained [11C]CH3I was trapped in 250 µL of anhydrous DMF containing 0.5 mg of (2S,3S)-Desethylreboxetine (1.75 µmol) and 8.5 µL of 5 M NaOH (42.5 µmol) at − 15 °C to − 20 °C, and then the reaction mixture was heated to 100 °C for 10 min. The radioactive mixture containing [11C]MRB was diluted with 1 mL of HPLC mobile phase and transferred to a column (10 mm I.D. × 250 mm, CAPCELL PAK C18, SHISEIDO, Tokyo, Japan) attached to an HPLC system (JACSO, Tokyo, Japan). Elution with 30:70 v/v CH3CN/0.2 M ammonium formate in sterile water at a flow rate of 5 mL/min yielded a radioactive fraction corresponding to pure [11C]MRB (retention time: 9.3 min). The fraction was collected in a rotary evaporator and evaporated to dryness at approximately 90 °C under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 3 mL of sterile tween-saline and filtered through a 0.22 µm Millex-GV filter (Merck Millipore Ltd., USA). At the end of the synthesis, 0.5–1.3 GBq of [11C]MRB was obtained with a molar activity of 34–102 GBq/µmol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!