The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Su8000 microscope

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

The SU8000 is a high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by Hitachi. It is designed to provide detailed imaging and analysis of a wide range of samples. The SU8000 utilizes a field emission electron gun to generate a focused electron beam, which is then scanned across the sample's surface to produce high-resolution images. The microscope is capable of achieving a resolution of up to 0.8 nanometers, making it suitable for a variety of applications, including materials science, nanotechnology, and life sciences research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using su8000 microscope

1

Visualization of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured for 1 day were fixed with a 3% glutaraldehyde solution. For confocal microscopy, the cells were labeled with DiD dye (D307; Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and visualized at a 633 nm wavelength using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). For scanning electron microscopy, the fixed cells were washed 3 times with deionized water, followed by dehydration with an ethanol gradient (50%, 70%, 90% and 99%) and hexamethyldisilazane treatment (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were visualized at an acceleration voltage of 5–10 keV in secondary electrons (SE) mode at various magnifications using a Hitachi SU8000 microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM and Light Microscopy Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) inspections, the HITACHI SU8000 microscope (Hitachi, Krefeld, Germany) was used. The light microscopical images were taken with a VHX-600 Digital Microscope (Keyence, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) or with the Olympus fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) using the wavelengths 496 nm (excitation) and 520 nm (emission) for calcein stained samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cellular Morphology Analysis via Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal and scanning electron microscopy: Cells cultured for 1 and 7 days were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (confocal microscopy) or 3% glutaraldehyde solution (scanning electron microscopy, SEM). For confocal microscopy, the F-actin (cell cytoskeleton) was stained with Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and cell nuclei were stained with Draq5 dye (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and visualized at 488 and 633 nm wavelength, respectively, using Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope. For scanning electron microscopy, the fixed cells were washed 3× with deionized water and dehydrated with ethanol gradient (50%, 70%, 90% and 99%) and hexamethyldisilazane treatment (Fluka, Buchs, Germany). The cells were visualized at an acceleration voltage of 5–10 keV in SE mode at various magnifications using Hitachi SU8000 microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detailed Analysis of Explanted IOLs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The second halves of the explanted IOLs were sent to the Max-Planck-Institute for Polymer Research in Mainz, Germany, for further analysis including scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS). For SEM analysis 2.5 μm cross sections through the IOL material were acquired using an ultramicrotome (UCT, Leica, Germany) and a 35° diamond knife (Diatome, Switzerland) and mounted on silicium grids. SEM examinations were carried out in low voltage (<1 kV) conditions using an SU8000 microscope (Hitachi, Japan). For a local chemical analysis EDS was performed using a Quantax 400 EDS detector (Bruker, Germany) to detect exogenous chemical elements within the IOL material.
This study solely involves laboratory analyses of IOL explants. No additional procedures on humans or animals were performed. An informed consent and ethics committee approval were therefore not required.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Characterization of MPS Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were obtained on a field-emission Hitachi SU-8000 microscope. TEM images, elemental mappings and linear scanning were conducted on a JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope. Raman spectra were acquired on a high-resolution Raman spectrometer (HORIBA LabRAM HR800). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained with Bruker Dimension Icon. The thickness of MPS NSs was acquired through analyzing AFM data with the software of Nano Scope Analysis (Bruker). The lateral sizes of MPS NSs were analyzed with the software of Nano Measure using TEM images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Polymer Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H NMR spectra
were recorded on a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) ECX-400 (400 MHz) and ECX-500
(500 MHz) spectrometer. FTIR spectra were recorded on a JASCO (Tokyo,
Japan) FT/IR-460Plus spectrometer. Samples were molded as KBr disks
using KBr dried under reduced pressure with heating above 200 °C
before use. XRD patterns were recorded on a Rigaku (Tokyo, Japan)
RINT RAPID diffractometer with Cu Kα irradiation. The degree
of crystallization was calculated from the intensities of the diffraction
of the 200 lattice at 2θ = 22.6° and the diffraction at
2θ = 18.5°.31 (link) Thermogravimetric
analysis was conducted using Seiko Instruments (Chiba, Japan) EXSTAR
6000 TG/DTA 6200 instrument under a nitrogen atmosphere. Scanning
electron microscopy measurements were conducted on a Hitachi (Tokyo,
Japan) SU8000 microscope at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Materials Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PXRD measurements were conducted on a PANalytical B.V. Empyrean having Cu Ka radiation (1.540598 Å) under 40 kV and 40 mA. SEM images were gained on a HITACHI SU8000 microscope. High‐resolution TEM images were obtained on a JEOL JEM‐2200FS microscope. XPS tests were surveyed on an ESCALAB 250 spectrometer using Al Ka excitation. TGA test was conducted using a TA TGA Q500 thermal analyzer system at the heating rate of 5 °C min−1 from room temperature to 800 °C in an air atmosphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis and Characterization of Polystyrene Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents except water used were commercial Sigma-Aldrich products. High-purity water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm at 25 °C was prepared by a water purification system (CSR-1-30T).
Monodisperse polystyrene (PS) microspheres were synthesized by an emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization technique32 (link). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Hitachi SU 8000 microscope operated at 15 kV. The average diameter of the PS microspheres was calculated from more than 100 microspheres. Polydispersity index (PDI) = Dm/Dn−1,where Dm and Dn were the weight-average and number-average diameters, respectively33 (link). The normal-incident reflectance spectra of 3D-PCswere obtained by using an Ocean Optics NIR Quest instrument equipped with a reflection probe. A specular reflectance standard(PN A338-MS-1) with a reflectance of 85–90% was used as measured reference.
An Nd:YAG laser was used as a laser source for LIDT test on continuous wave mode. The 1/e2 spot diameters measured via the knife-edge method were 3 mm and the effective spot sizes were 7 mm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluation of IOL Injector Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the used injectors were inspected and photographed with a light microscope and camera. (Olympus BX50 and Olympus C-7070, Olympus Optical Co. Ltd, Shinjuku, Tokio, Japan). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed at the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research under low-voltage (< 1 kV) conditions with an SU8000 microscope (Hitachi, Chiyoda, Tokio, Japan).
The Heidelberg Score for IOL injector damage (HeiScore)12 (link)
was used for damage evaluation, but modified to allow inclusion of the SEM images. Six grades of damage were distinguished:

Grade 0: No damage.

Grade 1: Slight scratches or deformation.

Grade 2: Deep scratch or moderate deformation of the nozzle tip.

Grade 3: Extension of the injector tube but not a full thickness crack.

Grade 4: Full thickness Crack.

Grade 5: Burst of the injector tube.

Deviating from the scale developed by Fang et al.12 (link)
slight or moderate deformation were observed for the AutonoMe injector using SEM and were graded the same as slight scratches (grade 1) and deep scratches (grade 2). Figure 1 shows representative images for the different grades. Each injector was classified based on light and scanning electron microscopy images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanomaterial Characterization by Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy was carried out using a Hitachi SU-8000 microscope operated at 5 kV. Transmission electron microscopy and high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) observations were performed using a JEOL JEM-2100F operated at 200 kV equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrometry analyzer. The samples for TEM characterizations were prepared by depositing a drop of the diluted colloidal suspension on a grid. Wide-angle powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired with a Rigaku Rint 2500 diffractometer with monochromated Cu-Kα radiation. Low-angle XRD patterns were obtained by using a NANO VIEWER (Rigaku, Japan) equipped with a Micro Max-007 HF high-intensity micro-focus rotating anode X-ray generator. X-Ray photoelectronic spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were obtained at room temperature by using a JPS-9010TR (JEOL) instrument with an Mg-Kα X-ray source. All the binding energies were calibrated via referencing to C 1s binding energy (284.6 eV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!