The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using anti t bet pe

1

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining, dead cells were excluded with the Near-IR Dead-Cell stain (Invitrogen). Antibodies used were: anti-CD3 PE-Cy7 or APC, anti-CD8 PerCP-Cy5.5 or eFluor 450, anti-CD69 FITC (eBioscience); anti-CD161 PE or APC, anti-CD4 VioGreen (Miltenyi Biotec); anti-Vα7.2 PE or FITC or PE-Cy7, anti-CD107α PE-Cy7, anti-Granzyme A PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-Perforin Pacific Blue, anti-granulysin PE, anti-FasL PE (BioLegend); anti-Granzyme B AlexaFluor700, anti-Perforin FITC, anti-Ki67 FITC (BD Biosciences), anti-Granzyme B APC (Invitrogen); anti-Granzyme K FITC (Immunotools); anti-T-bet PE (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-Granzyme A FITC, anti-Blimp1 AlexaFluor488 (R&D); anti-CD8β PE (Beckman Coulter).
Data were collected on the flow cytometers LSRII (BD Biosciences) or MACSQuant (Miltenyi Biotec), and was analyzed using FlowJo v9.6 (TreeStar). For ImageStream analysis, see Supplementary Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell suspensions were analysed using BD LSRII research flowcytometry, after staining with combinations of the following antibodies and their isotype controls: Anti-CD4-APC-CY7 (BD Pharmingen, USA), anti CD25-Alexa Fluor 700 (BD Pharmingen, USA), anti CCR4-PE-CY7 (BD Pharmingen, USA), anti CCR6-Alexa Fluor 647 (BioLegend), anti CD127-Alexa Fluor 647 (BD Pharmingen, USA), anti FoxP3-Alexa Fluor 488 (BD Pharmingen, USA), anti GATA-3-Alexa Fluor 647 (BD Pharmingen, USA), and anti Tbet-PE (Santa Cruz). For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilised using the cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences, USA) as per manufacturer's protocol. Data were analysed using FlowJo ® version 7.6 (Tree Star Inc., USA). Lymphocyte population was selected then identification of pure CD4 + proportion of T cells was gated on isotype control. The cell populations were calculated as percentages of CD4 + T cells to the whole lymphocytic count and presented as mean  SD. Identification of different T cell subsets and gating is shown in Figure S6, S7, S8 and S9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!