The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ncl hamlet

1

Dysferlin Quantification in Muscle Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From each muscle, fresh-frozen serial tissue sections were taken for protein preparation. Muscle samples harvested from treated and control groups were compared to WT tissue for levels of vector-mediated dysferlin compared to endogenous dysferlin. Protein (5 μg for WT lanes and 10 μg for all other lanes) extracted from treated and control samples was separated by SDS-PAGE (3–8% Novex NuPAGE gradient gels; Invitrogen), blotted on polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, and probed with NCL-Hamlet (Novocastra) primary antibody (for dysferlin) at a dilution of 1:1,000, or γ-tubulin antibody (Sigma–Aldrich) at a dilution of 1:10,000, followed by HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5,000; Millipore) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5,000; Millipore), and signal captured on Hyblot CL autoradiography film (Denville). Densitometry analysis was performed using ImageQuant TL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Dysferlin Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From each muscle, fresh-frozen serial tissue sections were taken for protein preparation. Muscle samples harvested from treated and control groups were compared with WT tissue for levels of vector-mediated dysferlin compared to endogenous dysferlin. Protein (15 μg) extracted from treated and control samples was separated by sodiumdodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (3–8% Novex NuPAGE gradient gels, Invitrogen), blotted on PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) or nitrocellulose membrane and probed with NCL-Hamlet (Novocastra, Buffalo Grove, IL USA) primary antibody (for dysferlin) at a dilution of 1:1000, or γ-tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA) at a dilution of 1:10,000 followed by horseradish-peroxidase (HRP) labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5000; Millipore, Billerica, MA USA) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000; Millipore) and signal captured on Hyblot CL autoradiography film (Denville, Metuchen, NJ USA). Densitometry analysis was performed using ImageQuant TL (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating Proteomics Quantitation in DBA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Select proteins were chosen to validate proteomics label-free quantitation and assess relative protein levels in additional DBA patient samples not analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Anti- HLA Class I ABC (ab70328), SPTLC1 (ab176706), SPTLC2 (ab23696), β-actin (ab8227), ICAM4 (ab67943), and CR1 (EPR6601) antibodies were purchased from Abcam. The anti-Dysferlin antibody, NCL-Hamlet, was purchased from NovoCastra, anti-ADD3 (17585-1-AP) was purchased from Proteintech Group, and anti-MVP (2H3-1A6) was purchased from Novus Biologicals. Goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugated with HRP were purchased from Abcam (ab6789) and Pierce (31460), respectively. Blots were developed using Amersham ECL Prime (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Muscle Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunostaining of muscle tissue, frozen transverse sections were fixed for 10 min by incubation in PBS at 100°C. Non-specific antigens were blocked with PBS, 0.2% Tween, 3% BSA at RT. Sections were then incubated at 4°C overnight with mouse primary antibodies directed against DHPR1α (Thermo Scientific Pierce, MA3–920) or Dysferlin (Novocastra, NCL-HAMLET). After extensive PBS washes, sections were incubated with biotinylated goat anti mouse antibodies (SouthernBiotech) and, after additional washes, with streptavidin conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen). Glass slides were mounted with FluorSave reagent™ (Calbiochem®, Merck) and visualized with a Leica confocal microscope TCS-SP2. Digital images of a slice corresponding to the muscle midsection were acquired with a CCD camera (Sony) and a motorized stage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Dysferlin Expression in Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize dysferlin expression, we isolated and fixed TA and quadriceps muscle with acetone in −20°C for 30 min; each muscle was sectioned by 10-μm thickness. The sample was washed with PBS, and nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min. The fixed muscle was incubated with specific dysferlin antibody (NCL-Hamlet; Leica Biosystems,Lincolnshire, IL, USA) for overnight. Muscle was washed with PBS and then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated IgG (Invitrogen, San Jose, CA, USA). For IgG staining, muscle section was incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, San Jose, CA, USA) antibody in 3% BSA for 2 h. After washing muscle sections with PBS, the stained muscle was mounted and visualized by immunofluorescent microscope (Eclipse 80i; Nikon Corporation, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody Sources for Muscular Dystrophy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were obtained from the following sources: SPA-Calpain-3 polyclonal antibody
(pAb) (Triple Point Biologics); goat anti-Calpain-3 (pIS2C) pAb (Cosmo Bio Co., LTD);
12A2-Calpain3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (NCL-CALP-12A2) and Dysferlin mAb (NCL-Hamlet,
Leica Biosystems); SERCA2 mAb (sc-376235, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); SERCA2a ATPase pAb
(A010-20, Badrilla Ltd.); Ryanodine Receptor mAb (MA3-925) and SERCA1 ATPase mAb (MA3-912,
Affinity BioReagents); DHPRalpha2 subunit mAb (ab2864, Abcam); ANK1 pAb (ARP42566_T100,
Aviva Systems Biology); Ubiquitin mAb (U0508), TRPC1 pAb (T8276) and Actin pAb (A2066,
Sigma-Aldrich); SUMO-1 mAb (#4940S, Cell Signaling); Parvalbumin mAb (#MAB1572,
Millipore); Myosin Heavy Chain-CFS mAb (IC4470F, R&D Systems); Myosin Heavy Chain
mAbs (A4.1025, A4.840) and Dystrophin mAb (MANDYS1) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma
Bank). Lentiviral particles were produced from plasmid DNAs TRCN0000030674 (mouse
Capn3-shRNA), TRCN0000003494 (human CAPN3-shRNA) and SHC002 (NS-shRNA)
(Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dysferlin Immunohistochemistry in Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical analysis for dysferlin in muscle samples was performed in the institution or hospital that the patient visited. Although the detailed methods may not have been identical in all cases, most cases were investigated by the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex immunostaining method using the mouse monoclonal antibody to dysferlin (NCL-Hamlet; Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) as the primary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Dysferlin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from differentiated iFDM cells using Radio-Immunoprecipitation Assay (RIPA) buffer (40 mmol/L Tris–HCl pH 8, 150 mmol/L sodium chloride 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% SDS) with protease inhibitors (complete, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) then a sample was quantified using a BCA (bicinchoninic acid) protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The remaining protein was heated at 70°C in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) Laemmli sample buffer 10 min then separated on 7.5% acrylamide TGX SDS–PAGE gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), blotted onto nitrocellulose filters using an iBlot Gel Transfer Device (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA, program P3, 10 min), and analyzed by western immunostaining using LI-COR Odyssey blocking reagent and methods as described.30 (link) Primary antibodies included and anti-DYSF specific for the C-terminal end (NCL-Hamlet, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA, 1/1000) or N-terminal end (Romeo, JAI-1-49-3, ABCAm, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1/500), and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (10R-G109a Fitzgerald, Acton, MA, USA, 1/1000). Blots were quantitatively analyzed using a LI-COR Odyssey infrared imager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!