The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

96 protocols using winrhizo

1

Root and Leaf Morphological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following X-ray scanning, plants were destructively harvested. Leaves/needles and petioles were removed from the main stem and scanned using a photo scanner (Epson Expression 10000XL, 2400 dpi, Epson America Inc., Long Beach, CA). Directly following the removal of aboveground tissues, acrylic containers were inverted and tamped to release the polystyrene medium along with roots, which were gently rinsed under a 0.5 mm sieve. Polystyrene beads still attached to roots were removed using forceps. Individual roots were separated manually to prevent overlapping segments, placed on a photo scanner, and scanned. After scanning, above and belowground tissues were placed in separate paper bags, dried at 55 C for 3 days, and then weighed. Scanned images were analyzed for leaf surface area, root surface area, and total root length using WinRhizo (WinRhizo 2011, Regent Instruments, Canada). The number of root tips were counted manually using the image analysis toolset, ImageJ (National Institute of Health, Bethesda MD). In ImageJ, each 2D root system scan was imported as a TIFF, and using the paintbrush tool, root tips were individually and sequentially numbered to ensure that no root tips were overlooked or counted twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biometric Analysis of Plant Cuttings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon termination of this experiment, cuttings were harvested in succession over three days, one treatment group per day. The order of harvesting was reversed between repetitions. For each cutting, roots, and shoots were separated with scissors, and shoot lengths were measured with a ruler. Roots were photographed using an Epson Perfection V700 scanner (Nagano, Japan). Root scan images were analyzed using WinRhizoTM (Regent Instruments Inc., Quebéc City, QC, Canada) software, which provides biometric data outputs based on images. The parameters of root length and root diameter were obtained using WinRhizoTM. The roots and shoots of each cutting were then dried at 70 °C for 72 h. Dry weights of roots and shoots were recorded on a precision scale. In repetition 2, the lengths of cuttings were also measured before the immersion step, and the difference in shoot lengths provided a measure of shoot growth during this experiment. Lastly, the dry weights of roots and shoots were divided to obtain a root/shoot dry weight ratio. In summary, the following seven biometric parameters were recorded: shoot length; shoot dry weight; root/shoot dry weight ratio; root length; root dry weight; root diameter; and shoot growth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fine Root Morphological Traits Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the experiment, roots were carefully removed from the soil and gently washed in order to measure morphological traits in fine roots (i.e., <2 mm in diameter which included mostly first to third order roots). We measured length, surface area, volume and root average diameter on a fresh sample using the WinRhizoTM scanner-based system (v.2007; Regent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada). We calculated different root morphological traits: specific root surface area (SRSA; cm2 mg−1), specific root length (SRL; cm mg−1), root average diameter (RAD; mm) and root tissue density (RTD; root dry weight per volume mg cm−3). Shoot and root mass were measured after drying samples at 70°C for 48 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Salinity Tolerance Screening in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seeds were bacterized with the inoculum at a rate of 500 µL per seed. Bacterized and control seeds (5 seeds per pot) were placed in 15.25 cm (diameter) pots filled with vermiculite (Perlite Canada Inc.) treated with 300 mL water or 100 mM NaCl solution (EC e = 5 ds m -1 ). The pots were placed in a greenhouse room maintained at 25 ± 2 • C and 50% relative humidity (Supplementary Figure 3). Seedling emergence was counted on 7 th and 8 th DAP (days after planting) and the plants were thinned to one seedling per pot. The plants were irrigated with 50 mL water thrice a week and fertilized with ½ strength Hoagland's solution once a week and sampled at 28 th DAP. Plant growth variables including plant height, leaf area, shoot dry weight, and root dry weight were measured. Roots were scanned (EPSON Expression 11000XL) and analyzed using WinRHIZO TM (Regent Instruments Inc.) image analysis platform to measure root volume, length, and surface area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Root and Shoot Development Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nine plant development parameters were measured on five six-leaves stage plants per plot (25 plants per treatment). The monitoring of root development was based on root dry biomass and root system architecture via the quantification of total root length, surface, and number, as well as average root diameter (WinRHIZO; Regent Instruments Inc., Québec City, Canada). The monitoring of shoot development was based on shoot dry biomass and stem diameter at the root collar, and on foliar morphology via the quantification of the length and average width of the fifth leaf from the shoot bottom (WinFOLIA; Regent Instruments Inc.). Data obtained with formulation F2 have been reported by [20 (link),21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Root Architecture and Colonization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We conducted root architecture (root length) analysis on entire root systems of plants in the sterile treatment. Root architecture in the sterile treatment has been found to correlate with mycorrhizal response (Koziol & Bever, 2015 (link); Seifert et al., 2009 (link)); smaller root systems tend to be more responsive to mycorrhizal fungi, whereas larger ones tend to be less responsive. Root systems were quantified using WinRhizo (Regent Instruments Inc.).
We also inspected root colonization in a subset of study plants to confirm that our sterile controls did not have AMF colonization and that the AMF treatments showed AMF colonization. Root colonization was assayed using Trypan Blue staining and subsequent microscope inspection (Giovanetti & Mosse, 1980 ). Stained roots were mounted on slides and were analyzed using 25 vertical transects for colonization as well as for presence of arbuscules, vesicles, coils, and hyphae (Table S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Root and Shoot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The roots from six harvested plants from each condition and genotype were immersed in water and scanned using a flatbed scanner followed by analysis using WinRHIZO software (Regent Instruments, Canada) to determine total root length (TRL). Shoot lengths were determined at harvest by measuring above ground shoot length with a ruler. The aerial parts of the plants were separated and dried in an oven (75°C) for 48 h and weighed using a weighing scale. The chlorophyll content was measured as a spad value (SPAD-502Plus, United States). The remaining six plants of each treatment were harvested, and roots were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a − 80°C freezer until they were extracted metabolomics analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Root Phenotyping and Imaging in EcoFAB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root system and root hair measurements were obtained at 4, 11, 17, 20, 23, and 28 DAT. Roots were scanned (Epson 10000XL) and root hairs were measured using a stereomicroscope (Leica, MZ12) inside the EcoFAB-N chambers (Fig. 1C–F). Depending on the developmental stage, root hairs were measured in a pre-decided region from the tip of the primary root, specifically 1–4 mm (4 DAT), 2–8 mm (11 DAT), 2–10 mm (17 DAT), and 4–15 mm (23 and 28 DAT). Later the images were analysed by ImageJ (version 2.0.0) and total root length, primary root length and root hair length were analysed through time. Lateral root length was calculated by subtracting the primary root length from the total root length.
Invasive root phenotyping was performed at 11, 20, and 28 DAT. Root fresh and dry weight were determined on a subsection of the available plants, listed in the respective figure legends. At 28 DAT, five roots from each group were scanned (Epson 10000XL) and binarized with WinRHIZO (Regent Instruments Inc., Canada), for determination of root length and comparison to non-invasive imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cucumber Root System Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cucumber root systems were scanned at 300 dpi using a special scanner (Expression 4990, Epson, Long Beach, CA, United States). Root-related growth parameters (Table 1) were determined after analysis of scanned images with a computer image-analysis software (Win RHIZO, Regent Instruments, Inc., Canada) and ImageJ software (V1.50b) (Abràmoff et al., 2004 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Maize Leaf Area and Root Length Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifteen representative plants per plot were tagged to measure the total leaf area every 10 days, starting when the first treatment entered into silking. Individual leaf area was calculated as the product of leaf length and width multiplied by 0.75. Subsequently, GLA was estimated visually until the canopy of all the plants fully turned yellow (Lisanti et al., 2013 (link)). Three maize plants per plot were sampled to measure the dynamics of LRLD every 20 days, from the beginning of the first treatment that entered into silking until the last treatment reached maturity. The same root sampling method was used as previously described (Supplementary Figure 2). Functional live roots can be distinguished by staining red using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). The detail procedure referred to Stūrīte et al. (2005) (link) is as follows: first, fresh roots were quickly incubated in breakers containing 0.6% (w/v) TTC, 0.06 M phosphate buffer, and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20, at 24°C for 20 h; then, the roots were scanned with an Epson Perfection scanner, and the live root lengths were analyzed with Win RHIZO (Regent Instruments, Inc., Canada) pixel color classification method. LRLD was calculated by dividing the live root length by the sampling core volume for each of the soil layers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!