The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hplc grade

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States, Australia, United Kingdom, India, France, Italy, China, Sao Tome and Principe, Mexico, Spain, Brazil, Poland, Japan

HPLC grade is a type of laboratory equipment used in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. It is designed to provide a high-quality, consistent, and reliable separation of chemical compounds. HPLC grade equipment ensures the accuracy and precision of analytical results by maintaining the necessary purity and performance standards required for HPLC applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

319 protocols using hplc grade

1

Carbohydrate Quantification via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The carbohydrate content was measured utilizing high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a Sykam instrument (Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany). Sample preparation and chromatographic analysis were performed following the procedures described in the study by Ziarno et al. (2019) . Briefly, 8 g of each sample was homogenized with 32 g of methanol (HPLC grade; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) using an automatic shaker and an ultrasonic bath (for 30 min). The samples were then centrifuged (16,000× g, 4°C, 30 min) and filtered through syringe filter (0.22 μm). The analysis was carried out with a guard column Sugar-D (10 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Cosmosil, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) and column Sugar-D (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Cosmosil). The chromatographic separation parameters were as follows: flow 1 mL/min, oven temperature 30°C, range of detector 10,000 mV, and sample rate 2 Hz. The mobile phase was a 60: 40 mixture of acetonitrile (HPLC-grade, Sigma-Aldrich) and deionized water. Carbohydrate concentration was calculated based on the standard curves (of fructose, galactose, glucose, sucrose, raffinose, stachyose, and verbascose; HPLC grade; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) and expressed as milligrams of sugar per 100 g samples (mg%). The presented data represents the average values obtained from five independent replications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasma Metabolomics Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A volume of 100 μL plasma was mixed with 100 μL H2O (HPLC grade, Merck Millipore, USA), and 600 μL methanol (HPLC grade, Merck Millipore, USA) was added. Samples were vortexed and incubated overnight at −20°C for protein precipitation. After centrifugation (13.000 × g, 15 min, 4°C), the supernatant was removed, dried using a SpeedVAC concentrator (SVC100H, SAVANT, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France), resuspended in 80 μL 20:80 acetonitrile-H2O mixture (HPLC grade, Merck Millipore) and stored at −20°C until use for metabolomic analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quercetin Extraction and Analysis from Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For extraction of quercetin, plasma (200 µL) was mixed with 400 µL methanol (99.9%, HPLC grade, Merck, Germany) and HCl (200 µL, 25%, analytical grade, Merck, Germany). The resulting mixture was vortexed in a vortex shaker for 90 s and incubated at 50 °C for fifteen minutes [22 (link)]. Then, this mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for ten minutes. The supernatant (20 µL) was injected into the column for determination of quercetin in plasma. The mixture of Na2HPO4 (≥99%, HPLC grade, Merck, Germany) (30 mM), acetonitrile (99.9%, HPLC grade, Merck, Germany), and methanol (65:29:6, v/v/v) was used as a mobile phase at the flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The column effluent was analyzed at 370 nm using a UV–Visible detector. The standard plots of quercetin were constructed, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using MS Excel, 2010. Maximum peak concentration in plasma (Cmax), the time required for maximum concentration (Tmax), was determined from concentration time curves. Area under curve (AUC) was determined using the trapezoidal method. Results were expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Brick Sample Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The field sample of 0.5 g of ground brick, was acidified to pH 2 with 3.0 ml of 4 N HCl (ACS grade, EMD Millipore) and sonicated in a water bath for 30 min. The mixtures were extracted into 3 ml ethyl acetate (HPLC grade, Sigma Aldrich), 2 times each and centrifuged at 1 × g for 5 min. The derived extracts were evaporated to dryness under ultrapure nitrogen gas (Grade 5.0) and dissolved in 100 μl of isopropanol (HPLC grade, Sigma Aldrich). The injection volume was 5 μl. Three biological replicates of each sample were analyzed (biological replicate in this study refers to an individual of the same group in the experiment), with p-value of 0.01 for abundance comparisons between the sets of triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Natamycin in Yogurt

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and water was distilled and filtered through a membrane filter (0.45 μm Natamycin powder was obtained from Dr. Ehrenstorfer, 16208400, 97.0%). Methanol (HPLC grade, Merck, 106018, ≥99.8%) and acetonitrile (HPLC grade, Sigma, 27225, 99.8–100.5%) acetic acid were used to prepare the dilute solution and mobile phase. Yoghurt samples from Turkey producers were obtained from trade network. All stock and working solutions were protected from light and stored in fridge at about 4°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Fasudil Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fasudil was quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a 1260 Infinity II LC system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a binary pump and a diode array detector. Analyses were performed using a reverse phase C18 column (150 mm × 5 mm; 5-µm microsphere size; Eclipse XDB-C18, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) preceded by a C18 security guard cartridge (Phenomenex, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) at 40 °C. The mobile phase was composed of ultrapure water (eluent A) and methanol (eluent B; HPLC grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), both containing 0.03% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany). Fasudil was eluted by a gradient at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The gradient used was as follows: 0.0–0.5 min constant at 85% (v/v) eluent A; 0.5–6.5 min 85–40% (v/v) eluent A (linear gradient); 6.5–7.0 min changed to 5% (v/v) eluent A; 7.0–17.0 min constant at 5% (v/v) eluent A; 17.0–17.10 min changed to 85% (v/v) eluent A; 17.10–27.10 min constant at 85% (v/v) eluent A. The injection volume was 5 µL for encapsulation efficiency (% EE) measurements and 10 to 12 µL for in vitro release studies. Each sample was injected three times. The absorbance of fasudil was measured at λ = 320 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Ergosterol in Fungi by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ergosterol concentrations were quantified by applying HPLC according to the protocol of Gulis and Bärlocher [27 (link)]. An Agilent 1260 Infinity Bioinert HPLC System equipped with an autosampler was used together with a Zorbax StableBond Aq Analytical Guard Column (4.6 × 12.5 mm; 5 µm particle size; 80 Å pore size, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a Zorbax Eclipse AAA Rapid resolution column (4.6 × 150 mm; 3.5 µm particle size, 80 Å pore size, Agilent Technologies). For detecting ergosterol, the wavelength of the UV detector was set at 282 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 100% methanol (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich) with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The injection volume was 400 µL and the samples were run for 20 min in total, including 5 min of purging at a column temperature of 25 °C. Ergosterol standards (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared in a range from 500 µM to 30 nM in methanol and run together in the same sequence batch with the fungal samples. Furthermore, the temperature of the autosampler was kept at 10 °C to protect them from potential degradation. Peak areas were used for calculating ergosterol concentrations in samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC Analysis of Tetrapyrrole Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tetrapyrrole extracts were analyzed using a JASCO HPLC 2000 series system (Jasco, Gross-Umstadt, Germany) as previously described.7 (link) The chromatographic separation of samples (20 μL injection volume) containing SAM and 5′-deoxyadenosine (DOA) was performed on a HYPERCARB column (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) with 5 μm particle size and 100 mm × 2.1 mm column dimensions at 25 °C. The substances were eluted at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min–1 using a gradient system. Solvent A consisted of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (for UV-spectroscopy, Fluka) and solvent B of acetonitrile (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich) containing 0.08% trifluoroacetic acid (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich). At the time of sample injection the mobile phase consisted of 100% solvent A. Within 25 min the content of solvent B was increased to 100% with concomitant decrease of solvent A. Then, the content of solvent B was held for 5 min before returning to the initial conditions. SAM and DOA were detected by photometric diode array analysis at 200–650 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Solvent-Casting Technique for Polymer Blend Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PHA solutions were prepared by dissolving 1.0 g of mcl-PHA or P(3HB) in 20 mL of chloroform (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), under constant stirring, at room temperature, until complete dissolution, as described by Rebocho et al. [21 ]. The blend films were prepared as described by Azari et al. [23 (link)], by dissolving the polymer (1.0 g) in 20 mL of a 1:9 (v/v) dimethylformamide and chloroform solution (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), under constant stirring, at 60 °C during 24 h. The solutions were transferred into glass petri dishes (diameter of 10 cm), which were placed in a desiccator and kept at room temperature until complete solvent evaporation. Slow solvent evaporation was performed in a saturated chloroform atmosphere to avoid the formation of cracks and non-selective voids in the films and to guaranty their homogeneity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC Analysis of Oxymatrine and Rhein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC was used to determine the concentrations of oxymatrine and rhein, two major components of EC. Oxymatrine and rhein standards (purity 98.0%) with CAS numbers 16837-52-8 and 478-4-3, respectively, were used. An Agilent HPLC-UV1260 series system (Agilent, UAS) equipped with a column compartment, automated sampler, and quaternary pump was used for analysis, along with a variable wavelength detector (VWD). The sample injection volume was set at 10 µL at room temperature (30.0 °C), and separation was performed using a C18 reversed-phase column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm inner diameter of 5 µm; Eclipse XDB, Agilent, USA). For the detection of oxymatrine at 220 nm (Qiu et al. 2003 (link)), the mobile phase consisted of 15% acetonitrile (HPLC grade; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 85% 0.1 phosphoric acid solution (HPLC grade) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). For the detection of rhein at 254 nm (Cheng et al. 2020 (link)), the mobile phase consisted of 85% methanol (HPLC grade; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 15% 0.1 phosphoric acid solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!